The DOI matches its Crossref record; 36 of the 37 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The socially extended mind
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Decades of research have already shown that technologies, artifacts, and social partners can become constitutive elements of human cognitive ecologies [8,24,37].”
From 4E cognition and the coevolution of human–AI interaction (2025) · cites this paper as [24]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“The guiding thesis is that cognition is embodied, embedded, enactive, and extended [24,71], [47].”
From 4E cognition and the coevolution of human–AI interaction (2025) · cites this paper as [24]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“In the 4E view, meaning arises not from internal representations alone, but through sensorimotor coupling with the environment, affordance-responsiveness, and norm-governed interaction with others [24,48].”
From 4E cognition and the coevolution of human–AI interaction (2025) · cites this paper as [24]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Clark, A., & Chalmers, D. (1998) · Analysis · doi:10.1093/analys/58.1.7 · Cited by 6,333 · cited 4×
“Rowlands (2009), in response to the cognitive bloat argument, has suggested that part of what qualifies a process as cognitive is that it is owned by the agent.”
BackgroundInfluentialNavigation-related structural change in the hippocampi of taxi drivers
Maguire, E. A., Gadian, D. G., Johnsrude, I. S., Good, C. D., Ashburner, J., Frackowiak, R. S. J., & Frith, C. D. (2000) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.070039597 · Cited by 3,225
Reconstruction of automobile destruction: An example of the interaction between language and memory
Loftus, E. F., & Palmer, J. C. (1974) · Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0022-5371(74)80011-3 · Cited by 1,909
Participatory sense-making: An enactive approach to social cognition
De Jaegher, H., & Di Paolo, E. (2007) · Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1007/s11097-007-9076-9 · Cited by 1,640
Extraneous factors in judicial decisions
Danziger, S., Levav, J., & Avnaim-Pesso, L. (2011) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1018033108 · Cited by 1,431
Small, D. A., Loewenstein, G. F., & Slovic, P. (2006) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2006.01.005 · Cited by 1,041
Philosophy of Mind : Classical and Contemporary Readings
Chalmers, D. J. (2021) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 989
Conditional automaticity: Varieties of automatic influence in social perception and cognition.
Bargh, J. A. (1989) · Cited by 975
Can social interaction constitute social cognition?
De Jaegher, H., Di Paolo, E., & Gallagher, S. (2010) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2010.06.009 · Cited by 911
Self-citation“If I look at the mass I will never act”: Psychic numbing and genocide
Slovic, P. (2007) · Judgment and Decision Making · doi:10.1017/s1930297500000061 · Cited by 892
Flagged first, then by citations
1 of the 37 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Gallagher, S. (2020) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198846345.001.0001 · Cited by 375
Self-citationAffordances and the musically extended mind
Krueger, J. W. (2014) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.01003 · Cited by 298
Enactive Metaphors: Learning Through Full-Body Engagement
Gallagher, S., & Lindgren, R. (2015) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-015-9327-1 · Cited by 200
Self-citationEmbodied and Enactive Approaches to Cognition
Gallagher, S. (2023) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781009209793 · Cited by 236
Self-citationSocial Constraints on the Direct Perception of Emotions and Intentions
Gallagher, S., & Varga, S. (2013) · Topoi · doi:10.1007/s11245-013-9203-x · Cited by 152
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Gallagher, S.
- Affiliations
- University of Hertfordshire (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Gallagher, Shaun
- ORCID
- Gallagher, Shaun
- Venue
- Cognitive Systems Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2013-12
- Volume
- 25-26
- Pages
- 4-12
- ISSN
- 1389-0417 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2114814877
- Cited by
- 378
- References
- 37
- Citations by year
- 2026: 24 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 61 · 2019: 56 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 10
- FWCI
- 10.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Cognitive Systems Research (publishedVersion)
- University of Hertfordshire Research Archive (University of Hertfordshire) (submittedVersion)
- Research Online (University of Wollongong) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Embodied and Extended Cognition
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Cybernetics and Technology in Society
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophy and Theoretical Science
- Keywords
- extended mind, social cognition, enactive cognition, social affordances, institutional framework, critical social theory
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
