Cited by 116Advanced Neural Network ApplicationsAdvanced Image and Video Retrieval TechniquesDomain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Inception and ResNet features are (almost) equivalent

Open access
McNeely-White, David, Beveridge, J. Ross, Draper, Bruce A.·2020·Cognitive Systems Research

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cogsys.2019.10.004

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. Erhan, 2009, Visualizing higher-layer features of a deep network, University of Montreal, 1341, 1
  2. Ioffe, S., & Szegedy, C. (2015). Batch normalization: Accelerating deep network training by reducing internal covariate shift. arXiv preprint arXiv:1502.03167. · arXiv
  3. Kingma, D. P. & Ba, J. (2014). Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.6980. · arXiv
  4. Kornblith, S., Shlens, J., & Le, Q. V. (2018). Do better imagenet models transfer better? arXiv preprint arXiv:1805.08974. · DOI · Paper page
  5. Lenc, 2019, Understanding image representations by measuring their equivariance and equivalence, International Journal of Computer Vision, 127, 456, 10.1007/s11263-018-1098-y · DOI · Paper page
  6. Liu, 2015, Crf learning with cnn features for image segmentation, Pattern Recognition, 48, 2983, 10.1016/j.patcog.2015.04.019 · DOI
  7. Li, 2016, Visual saliency detection based on multiscale deep cnn features, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 25, 5012, 10.1109/TIP.2016.2602079 · DOI
  8. Russakovsky, 2015, Imagenet large scale visual recognition challenge, International Journal of Computer Vision, 115, 211, 10.1007/s11263-015-0816-y · DOI · Paper page
  9. Zeiler, M.D., Taylor, G.W., & Fergus, R. (2011). Adaptive deconvolutional networks for mid and high level feature learning. In: ICCV, number 2, pp. 6. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
McNeely-White, D., Beveridge, J. R., & Draper, B. A.
Affiliations
Colorado State University (US)
Corresponding author
Beveridge, J. Ross
Venue
Cognitive Systems Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-01
Volume
59
Pages
312-318
ISSN
1389-0417 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2981030558
Cited by
116
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 7
FWCI
5.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Cognitive Systems Research (acceptedVersion)
Funders
Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
Keywords
Inception module, ResNet, convolutional neural network architecture, feature similarity, feature mapping, affine transformation, feature evaluation, training data selection, image feature extraction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review