PreprintCited by 5,370Advanced Neural Network ApplicationsExplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)Visual Attention and Saliency Detection

Deep Inside Convolutional Networks: Visualising Image Classification Models and Saliency Maps

Open access
Simonyan, Karen, Vedaldi, Andrea, Zisserman, Andrew·2013·arXiv

Abstract

This paper addresses the visualisation of image classification models, learnt using deep Convolutional Networks (ConvNets). We consider two visualisation techniques, based on computing the gradient of the class score with respect to the input image. The first one generates an image, which maximises the class score [Erhan et al., 2009], thus visualising the notion of the class, captured by a ConvNet. The second technique computes a class saliency map, specific to a given image and class. We show that such maps can be employed for weakly supervised object segmentation using classification ConvNets. Finally, we establish the connection between the gradient-based ConvNet visualisation methods and deconvolutional networks [Zeiler et al., 2013].

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.1312.6034

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Saliency maps have been recently transposed to P300 decoding.

    “saliency maps (Simonyan et al., 2013), simple representations reporting the gradient of a target class score with respect to each input pixel, have been recently transposed to P300 decoding (Farahat et al., 2019).”
  • Barring a few exceptions, much existing explainable ML work is designed and developed for benchmark classification problems, often with synthetic data, and usually validated with user studies limited to users in research settings such as Amazon Mechanical Turk.

    “Barring a few exceptions (Caruana et al., 2015; Lundberg et al., 2018b; Ustun et al., 2019; Jesus et al., 2021), much of the existing work is designed and developed for benchmark classification problems, often with synthetic data and usually validated with user studies limited to users in research settings such as Amazon Mechanical Turk (AMT; Simonyan et al., 2013; Zeiler and Fergus, 2014; Bach et”
  • Saliency maps and guided backpropagation are common approaches used to shed light on the predictions of Deep CNN.

    “Another common approach that is used to shed light on the predictions of Deep CNN is based on creating saliency maps [132] and guided backpropagation [133], [134].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Simonyan, K., Vedaldi, A., & Zisserman, A.
Affiliations
University of Oxford (GB)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2013
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2169393322
Cited by
5,370
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 53 · 2025: 259 · 2024: 513 · 2023: 605 · 2022: 584 · 2021: 1000 · 2020: 776 · 2019: 650 · 2018: 434 · 2017: 250 · 2016: 150 · 2015: 73 · 2014: 19 · 2012: 1
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Visual Attention and Saliency Detection
Keywords
image classification, saliency maps, class activation maps, deconvolutional networks

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review