Cited by 481Immunotherapy and Immune ResponsesImmune responses and vaccinationsHIV Research and Treatment

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 40 of the 40 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Heterologous prime-boost vaccination

Open access
Lu, Shan·2009·Current Opinion in Immunology

Abstract

An effective vaccine usually requires more than one time immunization in the form of prime-boost. Traditionally the same vaccines are given multiple times as homologous boosts. New findings suggested that prime-boost can be done with different types of vaccines containing the same antigens. In many cases such heterologous prime-boost can be more immunogenic than homologous prime-boost. Heterologous prime-boost represents a new way of immunization and will stimulate better understanding on the immunological basis of vaccines.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.coi.2009.05.016

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 40 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 480

Metadata

Authors
Lu, S.
Affiliations
Jiangsu Province Hospital (CN)
Corresponding author
Lu, Shan
Venue
Current Opinion in Immunology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-06
Volume
21
Issue
3
Pages
346-351
ISSN
0952-7915 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1979742563
Cited by
481
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 66 · 2021: 53 · 2020: 41 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 34 · 2012: 18
FWCI
1.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Current Opinion in Immunology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (P01AI082274, R01AI065250, R01 AI06250, U19AI082676)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immunotherapy and Immune Responses
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immune responses and vaccinations
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Virology › HIV Research and Treatment
Keywords
heterologous prime-boost, prime-boost vaccination, vaccine immunogenicity, vaccine adjuvants
MeSH terms
Animals, Humans, Immunization, Secondary, Neoplasms, Research, Research Design, Vaccination, HIV Infections, AIDS Vaccines, Cancer Vaccines

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review