Cited by 30Icing and De-icing TechnologiesSpacecraft and Cryogenic TechnologiesSurface Modification and Superhydrophobicity

Evaluation of ice release coatings at cryogenic temperature for the space shuttle

Ferrick, M.G., Mulherin, N.D., Haehnel, R.B., Coutermarsh, B.A., Durell, G.D., Tantillo, T.J., Curtis, L.A., Clair, T.L. St. +4 more·2008·Cold Regions Science and Technology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.coldregions.2007.03.002

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Only numerical results were reported in Kim et al.'s study, without further experimental data on cryogenic frost deposition being provided and used for validation of their mathematical models.

    “However, as in the study of Ferrick et al. [25], only numerical results were reported, without further experimental data on cryogenic frost deposition being provided and used for the validation of their mathematical models.”
  • No data on frost layer growth were presented in Ferrick et al.'s report; their research focused on the effectiveness of ice-release coatings only.

    “However, no data on frost layer growth were presented in their report; their research was focused on the effectiveness of ice-release coatings only.”
  • Ferrick et al. studied surfaces of liquid-oxygen feed-line brackets, on which frost deposition may appear during the prelaunch period following fuel loading of space shuttles; the surfaces were maintained at a constant temperature of -112°C.

    “They studied the surfaces of liquidoxygen feed-line brackets, on which frost deposition may appear during the prelaunch period following the fuel loading of space shuttles; the aforementioned surfaces were maintained at a constant temperature of 112 ° C.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ferrick, M. G., Mulherin, N. D., Haehnel, R. B., Coutermarsh, B. A., Durell, G. D., Tantillo, T. J., Curtis, L. A., Clair, T. L. S., Weiser, E. S., Cano, R. J., Smith, T. M., & Martinez, E. C.
Affiliations
  • Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory (US)
  • Marshall Space Flight Center (US)
  • National Institute of Aerospace (US)
  • Langley Research Center (US)
  • Kennedy Space Center (US)
  • Lockheed Martin (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
Ferrick, M.G.
Venue
Cold Regions Science and Technology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-04
Volume
52
Issue
2
Pages
224-243
ISSN
0165-232X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2094095375
Cited by
30
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Cold Regions Science and Technology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Icing and De-icing Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Spacecraft and Cryogenic Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Surfaces, Coatings and Films › Surface Modification and Superhydrophobicity
Keywords
ice adhesion, Space Shuttle External Tank, cryogenic temperatures, Teflon coating, coating durability, hydrophobicity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review