Cited by 15Geriatric Care and Nursing HomesDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchNursing education and management

The ‘unworthy’ patient with dementia in geriatric rehabilitation hospitals

Open access
Digby, Robin, Lee, Susan, Williams, Allison·2018·Collegian

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.colegn.2017.10.002

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 31 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Digby, R., Lee, S., & Williams, A.
Affiliations
Monash University (AU)
Corresponding author
Digby, Robin
Venue
Collegian
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-08
Volume
25
Issue
4
Pages
377-383
ISSN
1322-7696 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2765709319
Cited by
15
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2
FWCI
0.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Collegian Journal of the Royal College of Nursing Australia (publishedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Monash University
  • Dementia Australia
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Research and Theory › Nursing education and management
Keywords
dementia, nurses' perceptions, patient experience, hospital discharge, nursing workload, organizational culture, risk management, empathy in care

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review