Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 161

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Development of azithromycin–PLGA nanoparticles: Physicochemical characterization and antibacterial effect against Salmonella typhi

Open access
Mohammadi, Ghobad, Valizadeh, Hadi, Barzegar-Jalali, Mohammad, Lotfipour, Farzaneh, Adibkia, Khosro, Milani, Morteza, Azhdarzadeh, Morteza, Kiafar, Farhad, Nokhodchi, Ali·2010·Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces

Abstract

The objective of the present research was to formulate poly(lactide-co-glycolide) nanoparticles loaded with azithromycin with appropriate physicochemical properties and antimicrobial activity. Azithromycin-loaded poly(lactide-co-glycolide) (PLGA) nanoparticles (NPs) were prepared in three different ratios of drug to polymer by nanoprecipitation technique. Antibacterial activity of these nanoparticles was examined against gram-negative intra cellular microorganism Salmonella typhi. The antibacterial effect was investigated using serial dilution technique to achieve the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of nanoparticles. The results showed that physicochemical properties were affected by drug to polymer ratio. The results showed that nanoscale size particles ranging from 212 to 252nm were achieved. Physicochemical properties were affected by drug to polymer ratio. The highest entrapment efficiency (78.5+/-4.2%) was obtained when the ratio of drug to polymer was 1:3. Zeta (zeta) potential of the nanoparticles was fairly negative. The DSC thermograms and X-ray diffraction patterns revealed that the drug in the nanoparticles was in amorphous state. FT-IR spectroscopy demonstrated no detectable interactions between the drug and polymer in molecular level. In vitro release study showed two phases: an initial burst for 4h followed by a very slow release pattern during a period of 24h. The results of antimicrobial activity test showed that the nanoparticles were more effective than pure azithromycin against S. typhi with the nanoparticles showing equal antibacterial effect at 1/8 concentration of the intact drug. In conclusion, the azithromycin nanoparticle preparations showed appropriate physicochemical and improved antimicrobial properties which can be useful for oral administration.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2010.05.027

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 161

Metadata

Authors
Mohammadi, G., Valizadeh, H., Barzegar-Jalali, M., Lotfipour, F., Adibkia, K., Milani, M., Azhdarzadeh, M., Kiafar, F., & Nokhodchi, A.
Venue
Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-10
Volume
80
Issue
1
Pages
34-39
ISSN
0927-7765 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2084673355
Cited by
161
References
2
FWCI
2.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Development of azithromycin–PLGA nanoparticles: Physicochemical characterization and antibacterial effect against Salmonella typhi. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2010.05.027
The paper
Mohammadi, G., Valizadeh, H., Barzegar-Jalali, M., Lotfipour, F., Adibkia, K., Milani, M., Azhdarzadeh, M., Kiafar, F., & Nokhodchi, A. (2010). Development of azithromycin–PLGA nanoparticles: Physicochemical characterization and antibacterial effect against Salmonella typhi. Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2010.05.027

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.