The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Antibacterial effects of silver nanoparticles on gram-negative bacteria: Influence on the growth and biofilms formation, mechanisms of action
Open accessAbstract
Antibacterial action of silver nanoparticles (AgNP) on Gram-negative bacteria (planctonic cells and biofilms) is reported in this study. AgNP of 8.3 nm in diameter stabilized by hydrolyzed casein peptides strongly inhibited biofilms formation of Escherichia coli AB1157, Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1 and Serratia proteamaculans 94 in concentrations of 4-5 μg/ml, 10 μg/ml and 10-20 μg/ml, respectively. The viability of E. coli AB1157 cells in biofilms was considerably reduced by AgNP concentrations above 100 to -150 μg/ml. E. coli strains with mutations in genes responsible for the repair of DNA containing oxidative lesions (mutY, mutS, mutM, mutT, nth) were less resistant to AgNP than wild type strains. This suggests that these genes may be involved in the repair of DNA damage caused by AgNP. E. coli mutants deficient in excision repair, SOS-response and in the synthesis of global regulators RpoS, CRP protein and Lon protease present similar resistance to AgNP as wild type cells. LuxI/LuxR Quorum Sensing systems did not participate in the control of sensitivity to AgNP of Pseudomonas and Serratia. E. coli mutant strains deficient in OmpF or OmpC porins were 4-8 times more resistant to AgNP as compared to the wild type strain. This suggests that porins have an important function related AgNP antibacterial effects.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bacterial Biofilms: A Common Cause of Persistent Infections
Costerton, J. W., Stewart, P. S., & Greenberg, E. P. (1999) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.284.5418.1318 · Cited by 12,167
Base-excision repair of oxidative DNA damage
David, S. S., O'Shea, V. L., & Kundu, S. (2007) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature05978 · Cited by 1,238
Cited by
Silver nanoparticles: A new view on mechanistic aspects on antimicrobial activity
Durán, N., Durán, M., de Jesus, M. B., Seabra, A. B., Fávaro, W. J., & Nakazato, G. (2016) · Nanomedicine: Nanotechnology, Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.nano.2015.11.016 · Cited by 1,542
Similarities and Differences between Silver Ions and Silver in Nanoforms as Antibacterial Agents
Kędziora, A., Speruda, M., Krzyżewska, E., Rybka, J., Łukowiak, A., & Bugla-Płoskońska, G. (2018) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms19020444 · Cited by 452
Prevention of biofilm formation by quorum quenching
Paluch, E., Rewak-Soroczyńska, J., Jędrusik, I., Mazurkiewicz, E., & Jermakow, K. (2020) · Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology · doi:10.1007/s00253-020-10349-w · Cited by 445
Recent developments in the use of nanoparticles for treatment of biofilms
Han, C., Romero, N., Fischer, S., Dookran, J., Berger, A., & Doiron, A. L. (2017) · Nanotechnology Reviews · doi:10.1515/ntrev-2016-0054 · Cited by 114
Metadata
- Authors
- Radzig, M. A., Nadtochenko, V. A., Koksharova, O. A., Kiwi, J., Lipasova, V. A., & Khmel, I. A.
- Venue
- Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2013-02
- Volume
- 102
- Pages
- 300-306
- ISSN
- 0927-7765 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2051081823
- Cited by
- 472
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 8.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Antibacterial effects of silver nanoparticles on gram-negative bacteria: Influence on the growth and biofilms formation, mechanisms of action. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2012.07.039
- The paper
- Radzig, M. A., Nadtochenko, V. A., Koksharova, O. A., Kiwi, J., Lipasova, V. A., & Khmel, I. A. (2013). Antibacterial effects of silver nanoparticles on gram-negative bacteria: Influence on the growth and biofilms formation, mechanisms of action. Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2012.07.039
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.