Safety and efficacy evaluation of gelatin-based nanoparticles associated with UV filters
Abstract
The safety and efficacy assessment of nanomaterials is a major concern of industry and academia. These materials, due to their nanoscale size, can have chemical, physical, and biological properties that differ from those of their larger counterparts. The encapsulation of natural ingredients can provide marked improvements in sun protection efficacy. This strategy promotes solubility enhancement of flavonoids and yields an improved active ingredient with innovative physical, physicochemical and functional characteristics. Rutin, a flavonoid, has chemical and functional stability in topical vehicles exerting a synergistic effect in association with ultraviolet (UV) filters. However, the solubility of rutin is a limiting factor. Additionally, this bioactive compound does not have tendency to permeate across the stratum corneum. As an alternative to common synthetic based sunscreens, rutin-entrapped gelatin nanoparticles were designed. The present study investigated the pre-clinical safety of gelatin nanoparticles (GNPs) using an in vitro method and also assessed the clinical safety and efficacy of the association of GNPs with three commonly used chemical UV filters (ethylhexyl dimethyl PABA, ethylhexyl methoxycinnamate and methoxydibenzoylmethane). The non-irritant and adequate safety profile under sun-exposed skin conditions of the nanomaterials and the emulsions qualified the products for clinical efficacy assays. The in vivo results indicated that the GNPs increased the antio…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Gelatine micro- and nano-spheres improve skin compatibility, safety, and efficacy.
“Additionally, gelatine micro- and nano-spheres improved skin compatibility, safety, and efficacy [41,42,43] and alginate microparticles influenced photostability, through the reduction of the EHMC’s (21) photoisomerisation [34].”
From UV Filters: Challenges and Prospects (2022) · cites this paper as [41]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 57 · Cited by 54
- Authors
- Oliveira, C. A. D., Dario, M. F., Sarruf, F. D., Mariz, I. F. A., Velasco, M. V. R., Rosado, C., & Baby, A. R.
- Affiliations
- Universidade de São Paulo (BR)
- Institute of Integrated Clinical Research (Brazil) (BR)
- University of Lisbon (PT)
- Universidade Lusófona (PT)
- Corresponding author
- Oliveira, Camila Areias de
- ORCID
- Venue
- Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016-04
- Volume
- 140
- Pages
- 531-537
- ISSN
- 0927-7765 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2173550062
- Cited by
- 54
- References
- 57
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 7
- FWCI
- 5.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Colloids and Surfaces B Biointerfaces (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (12/04435-9, 12/19972-0, 14/05906-0)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Skin Protection and Aging
- Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmaceutical Science › Advancements in Transdermal Drug Delivery
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Proteins in Food Systems
- Keywords
- gelatin nanoparticles, UV filters, rutin, flavonoids, sunscreen, encapsulation, solubility enhancement, skin irritation, antioxidant defense, sun protection factor, stratum corneum permeation, ethylhexyl methoxycinnamate, topical emulsion
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Animals, Chickens, Female, Gelatin, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Rutin, Skin, Skin Absorption, Sunscreening Agents, Swine, Ultraviolet Rays, Molecular Structure, Treatment Outcome, Microscopy, Confocal, Nanoparticles, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review