Cited by 32Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical ApplicationsWound Healing and TreatmentsDiabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management

3D PCL/collagen nanofibrous medical dressing for one-time treatment of diabetic foot ulcers

Chang, Ting, Yin, Huiyi, Yu, Xi, Wang, Lihuan, Fan, Longfei, Xin, John H., Yu, Hui·2022·Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces

Abstract

Nanofibrous dressings exhibit high specific surface areas, good histocompatibility, enhanced wound healing, and reduced inflammation, which have broad technological implications for treating diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs). However, current nanofibrous dressings still suffer from high resistance to cell infiltration and multiple dressing changes. In this study, polycaprolactone (PCL) and collagen were adopted as electrospinning materials to prepare a 3D PCL/Collagen (PC) nanofibrous dressing (3D-PC) using aqueous phase fibre reassembly technology. The matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) inhibitor doxycycline hyclate (DCH)-loaded halloysite nanotubes (HNTs) (DCH@HNTs) and antibacterial agent cephalexin (CEX) were loaded onto the dressing to prepare a multifunctional 3D drug-loaded PCL/Collagen nanofibrous dressing to promote DFU wound healing. The obtained 3D nanofibrous dressing exhibited high water absorption capacity and swelling capacity. It showed good antibacterial activity against Escherichia coli (E. coli) and Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) in vitro antibacterial test. In addition, the 3D nanofibrous dressing demonstrated good biocompatibility. It could significantly reduce the frequency of dressing changes and improve the healing of DFU wounds compared with the conventional multiple dressing changes method, suggesting a potential candidate for healing diabetic wounds.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2022.112480

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chang, T., Yin, H., Yu, X., Wang, L., Fan, L., Xin, J. H., & Yu, H.
Affiliations
  • Wuyi University (CN)
  • Hong Kong Polytechnic University (HK)
Corresponding author
  • Yu, Xi
  • Yu, Hui
Venue
Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-06
Volume
214
Pages
112480
ISSN
0927-7765 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4220818022
Cited by
32
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 1
FWCI
1.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Colloids and Surfaces B Biointerfaces (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Guangdong Provincial Natural Science Foundation (2019A1515011769)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Wound Healing and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management
Keywords
diabetic foot ulcer, polycaprolactone, collagen, electrospinning, halloysite nanotubes, doxycycline hyclate, matrix metalloproteinase inhibition, cephalexin, antibacterial activity, Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, wound healing, dressing change frequency, biocompatibility
MeSH terms
Anti-Bacterial Agents, Bandages, Collagen, Diabetes Mellitus, Escherichia coli, Humans, Staphylococcus aureus, Diabetic Foot, Nanofibers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review