Application of electrospinning and 3D-printing based bilayer composite scaffold in the skull base reconstruction during transnasal surgery
Abstract
Skull base defects are a common complication after transsphenoidal endoscopic surgery, and their commonly used autologous tissue repair has limited clinical outcomes. Tissue-engineered scaffolds prepared by advanced techniques of electrostatic spinning and three-dimensional (3D) printing was an effective way to solve this problem. In this study, soft tissue scaffolds consisting of centripetal nanofiber mats and 3D-printed hard tissue scaffolds consisting of porous structures were prepared, respectively. And the two layers were combined to obtain bilayer composite scaffolds. The physicochemical characterization proved that the nanofiber mat prepared by polylactide-polycaprolactone (PLCL) electrospinning had a uniform centripetal nanofiber structure, and the loaded bFGF growth factor could achieve a slow release for 14 days and exert its bioactivity to promote the proliferation of fibroblasts. The porous scaffolds prepared with polycaprolactone (PCL), and hydroxyapatite (HA) 3D printing have a 300 μm macroporous structure with good biocompatibility. In vivo experiments results demonstrated that the bilayer composite scaffold could promote soft tissue repair of the skull base membrane through the centripetal nanofiber structure and slow-release of bFGF factor. It also played the role of promoting the regeneration of the skull base bone tissue. In addition, the centripetal nanofiber structure also had a promotional effect on the regeneration of skull base bone tissue.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
PLCL applications include wound healing, vascular transplantation, bone and cartilage repair, and drug delivery systems.
“These applications include wound healing, vascular transplantation, bone and cartilage repair, and even drug delivery systems [14–20].”
From Application of PLCL as a biodegradable polymer in biomedical engineering (2026) · cites this paper as [16]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 35 · Cited by 11
- Authors
- Zhu, Y., Liu, X., Zhang, K., EL-Newehy, M., Abdulhameed, M. M., Mo, X., Cao, L., & Wang, Y.
- Affiliations
- Shanghai Medical College of Fudan University (CN)
- Donghua University (CN)
- King Saud University (SA)
- Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Mo, Xiumei
- Cao, Lei
- Wang, Yongfei
- ORCID
- Venue
- Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2025-01
- Volume
- 245
- Pages
- 114337
- ISSN
- 0927-7765 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4403681404
- Cited by
- 11
- References
- 35
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 5
- FWCI
- 1.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Colloids and Surfaces B Biointerfaces (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- King Saud University (RSP2024R65)
- Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality (20DZ2254900, RSPD2024R769)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Head and Neck Surgical Oncology
- Keywords
- skull base reconstruction, skull base defects, electrospinning, 3D printing, polycaprolactone, hydroxyapatite, transsphenoidal surgery complications, bone regeneration, soft tissue repair, fibroblast proliferation, macroporous scaffolds
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Biocompatible Materials, Polyesters, Porosity, Fibroblast Growth Factor 2, Durapatite, Skull Base, Plastic Surgery Procedures, Tissue Engineering, Cell Proliferation, Mice, Tissue Scaffolds, Nanofibers, Printing, Three-Dimensional
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review