The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cognitive computing and wireless communications on the edge for healthcare service robots
Open accessAbstract
Abstract In recent years, we have witnessed dramatic developments of mobile healthcare robots, which enjoy many advantages over their human counterparts. Previous communication networks for healthcare robots always suffer from high response latency and/or time-consuming computing demands. Robust and high-speed communications and swift processing are critical, sometimes vital in particular in the case of healthcare robots, to the healthcare receivers. As a promising solution, offloading delay-sensitive and communicating-intensive tasks to the robot is expected to improve the services and benefit users. In this paper, we review several state-of-the-art technologies, such as the human–robot interface, environment and user status perceiving, navigation, robust communication and artificial intelligence, of a mobile healthcare robot and discuss in details the customized demands over offloading the computation and communication tasks. According to the intrinsic demands of tasks over the network usage, we categorize abilities of a typical healthcare robot into alternative classes: the edge functionalities and the core functionalities. Many latency-sensitive tasks, such as user interaction, or time-consuming tasks including health receiver status recognition and autonomous moving, can be processed by the robot without frequent communications with data centers. On the other hand, several fundamental abilities, such as radio resource management, mobility management, service provisioning management, need to update the main body with the cutting-edge artificial intelligence. Robustness and safety, in this case, are the primary goals in wireless communications that AI may provide ground-breaking solutions. Based on this partition, this article refers to several state-of-the-art technologies of a mobile healthcare robot and reviews some challenges to be met for its wireless communications.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gradient-based learning applied to document recognition
Lecun, Y., Bottou, L., Bengio, Y., & Haffner, P. (1998) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/5.726791 · Cited by 58,805
Edge computing: Vision and challenges
Shi, W., Cao, J., Zhang, Q., Li, Y., & Xu, L. (2016) · IEEE Internet of Things Journal · doi:10.1109/jiot.2016.2579198 · Cited by 8,733
Generative Adversarial Networks
Goodfellow, I. J., Pouget-Abadie, J., Mirza, M., Xu, B., Warde-Farley, D., Ozair, S., Courville, A., & Bengio, Y. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1406.2661 · Cited by 4,477
Edge-centric Computing: Vision and Challenges
Garcia Lopez, P., Montresor, A., Epema, D., Datta, A., Higashino, T., Iamnitchi, A., Barcellos, M., Felber, P., & Riviere, E. (2015) · ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review · doi:10.1145/2831347.2831354 · Cited by 934
Future Edge Cloud and Edge Computing for Internet of Things Applications
Pan, J., & McElhannon, J. (2018) · IEEE Internet of Things Journal · doi:10.1109/jiot.2017.2767608 · Cited by 868
An overview of the Internet of Things for people with disabilities
Domingo, M. C. (2012) · Journal of Network and Computer Applications · doi:10.1016/j.jnca.2011.10.015 · Cited by 638
Cited by
Deep Learning Models for Real-time Human Activity Recognition with Smartphones
Wan, S., Qi, L., Xu, X., Tong, C., & Gu, Z. (2020) · Mobile Networks and Applications · doi:10.1007/s11036-019-01445-x · Cited by 594
Self-citationThe Internet of Things: Impact and Implications for Health Care Delivery
Kelly, J. T., Campbell, K. L., Gong, E., & Scuffham, P. (2020) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/20135 · Cited by 469
An Edge Traffic Flow Detection Scheme Based on Deep Learning in an Intelligent Transportation System
Chen, C., Liu, B., Wan, S., Qiao, P., & Pei, Q. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems · doi:10.1109/tits.2020.3025687 · Cited by 429
Self-citationA Survey of Robots in Healthcare
Kyrarini, M., Lygerakis, F., Rajavenkatanarayanan, A., Sevastopoulos, C., Nambiappan, H. R., Chaitanya, K. K., Babu, A. R., Mathew, J., & Makedon, F. (2021) · Technologies · doi:10.3390/technologies9010008 · Cited by 384
A survey on deep transfer learning to edge computing for mitigating the COVID-19 pandemic
Sufian, A., Ghosh, A., Sadiq, A. S., & Smarandache, F. (2020) · Journal of Systems Architecture · doi:10.1016/j.sysarc.2020.101830 · Cited by 156
Metadata
- Authors
- Wan, S., Gu, Z., & Ni, Q.
- Venue
- Computer Communications
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-01
- Volume
- 149
- Pages
- 99-106
- ISSN
- 0140-3664 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2979459011
- Cited by
- 247
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 22.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
