Cited by 874IoT and Edge/Fog ComputingSoftware-Defined Networks and 5GEnergy Efficiency in Computing

Future Edge Cloud and Edge Computing for Internet of Things Applications

Pan, Jianli, McElhannon, James·2018·IEEE Internet of Things Journal

Abstract

The Internet is evolving rapidly toward the future Internet of Things (IoT) which will potentially connect billions or even trillions of edge devices which could generate huge amount of data at a very high speed and some of the applications may require very low latency. The traditional cloud infrastructure will run into a series of difficulties due to centralized computation, storage, and networking in a small number of datacenters, and due to the relative long distance between the edge devices and the remote datacenters. To tackle this challenge, edge cloud and edge computing seem to be a promising possibility which provides resources closer to the resource-poor edge IoT devices and potentially can nurture a new IoT innovation ecosystem. Such prospect is enabled by a series of emerging technologies, including network function virtualization and software defined networking. In this survey paper, we investigate the key rationale, the state-of-the-art efforts, the key enabling technologies and research topics, and typical IoT applications benefiting from edge cloud. We aim to draw an overall picture of both ongoing research efforts and future possible research directions through comprehensive discussions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/jiot.2017.2767608

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In smart city surveillance systems, edge nodes are typically positioned between the monitoring devices and the cloud server.

    “In smart city surveillance systems, edge nodes are typically positioned between the monitoring devices and the cloud server [24].”

    From A Survey of Video Surveillance Systems in Smart City (2023) · cites this paper as [24]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pan, J., & McElhannon, J.
Affiliations
University of Missouri–St. Louis (US)
Venue
IEEE Internet of Things Journal
Published
2018-02
Volume
5
Issue
1
Pages
439-449
ISSN
2327-4662 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2766401293
Cited by
868
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 47 · 2025: 89 · 2024: 114 · 2023: 104 · 2022: 105 · 2021: 145 · 2020: 143 · 2019: 86 · 2018: 34 · 2017: 1
FWCI
48.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Internet of Things Journal (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Security Agency (H98230-17-1-0393, H98230-17-1-0352)
  • University of Missouri System Research Board Award
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › IoT and Edge/Fog Computing
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Software-Defined Networks and 5G
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Hardware and Architecture › Energy Efficiency in Computing
Keywords
edge-cloud computing, edge computing, Internet of Things, low latency, network function virtualization, software-defined networking, IoT applications, resource-constrained edge devices

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review