The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
An ensemble learning and fog-cloud architecture-driven cyber-attack detection framework for IoMT networks
Abstract
Abstract Internet of Medical Things (IoMT), an application of Internet of Things (IoT), is addressing countless limitation of traditional health-care systems such as quality of patient care, healthcare costs, shortage of medical staff and inadequate medical supplies in an efficient manner. With the use of the IoMT systems, there are unparalleled benefits that are enhancing the quality and efficiency of treatments and thereby are improving patients health. However, the 2018 Ransomware cyber-attack on Indiana hospital system exposed the critical fault-lines among IoMT environment. The gravity and frequency of cyber-attacks are expanding at an alarming rate. Motivated from aforementioned challenges, we propose an ensemble learning and fog-cloud architecture-driven cyber-attack detection framework for IoMT networks. The ensemble design, combines Decision Tree, Naive Bayes, and Random Forest as first-level individual learners. In the next level, the classification results are used by XGBoost for identifying normal and attack instances. Second, for dynamic and heterogeneous networks such as IoMT, fog, and cloud, we present a deployment architecture for the proposed framework as, Software as a Service (SaaS) in fog side and Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS) in cloud side. Further, most of the existing work is evaluated using KDD CUP99 or NSL-KDD dataset. These datasets lack modern IoMT-based attacks. Therefore, the proposed model uses a realistic dataset namely, ToN-IoT which is collected from a heterogeneous and large-scale IoT network. The experimental result shows that the proposed framework can achieve detection rate of 99.98%, accuracy of 96.35%, and can reduce false alarm rate upto 5.59%.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Toward Generating a New Intrusion Detection Dataset and Intrusion Traffic Characterization
Sharafaldin, I., Habibi Lashkari, A., & Ghorbani, A. A. (2018) · Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Information Systems Security and Privacy · doi:10.5220/0006639801080116 · Cited by 5,318
Wearable biosensors for healthcare monitoring
Kim, J., Campbell, A. S., de Ávila, B. E.-F., & Wang, J. (2019) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41587-019-0045-y · Cited by 3,373
R.M., S. P., Maddikunta, P. K. R., M., P., Koppu, S., Gadekallu, T. R., Chowdhary, C. L., & Alazab, M. (2020) · Computer Communications · doi:10.1016/j.comcom.2020.05.048 · Cited by 470
Securing internet of medical things systems: limitations, issues and recommendations
Yaacoub, J.-P. A., Noura, M., Noura, H. N., Salman, O., Yaacoub, E., Couturier, R., & Chehab, A. (2020) · Future Generation Computer Systems · doi:10.1016/j.future.2019.12.028 · Cited by 308
Big Data and Machine Learning Based Secure Healthcare Framework
Kaur, P., Sharma, M., & Mittal, M. (2018) · Procedia Computer Science · doi:10.1016/j.procs.2018.05.020 · Cited by 218
Security and Privacy in the Internet of Medical Things: Taxonomy and Risk Assessment
Alsubaei, F., Abuhussein, A., & Shiva, S. (2017) · 2017 IEEE 42nd Conference on Local Computer Networks Workshops (LCN Workshops) · doi:10.1109/lcn.workshops.2017.72 · Cited by 162
Cited by
Deep Learning-Based Intrusion Detection for Distributed Denial of Service Attack in Agriculture 4.0
Ferrag, M. A., Shu, L., Djallel, H., & Choo, K.-K. R. (2021) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics10111257 · Cited by 253
Ensemble-Learning Framework for Intrusion Detection to Enhance Internet of Things’ Devices Security
Alotaibi, Y., & Ilyas, M. (2023) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s23125568 · Cited by 131
P2SF-IoV: A Privacy-Preservation-Based Secured Framework for Internet of Vehicles
Kumar, R., Kumar, P., Tripathi, R., Gupta, G. P., & Kumar, N. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems · doi:10.1109/tits.2021.3102581 · Cited by 111
Self-citationBlockchain and explainable AI for enhanced decision making in cyber threat detection
Kumar, P., Javeed, D., Kumar, R., & Islam, A. K. M. N. (2024) · Software: Practice and Experience · doi:10.1002/spe.3319 · Cited by 58
Self-citationAn Adaptive Intrusion Detection System in the Internet of Medical Things Using Fuzzy-Based Learning
Alalhareth, M., & Hong, S.-C. (2023) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s23229247 · Cited by 52
Metadata
- Authors
- Kumar, P., Gupta, G. P., & Tripathi, R.
- Venue
- Computer Communications
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-01
- Volume
- 166
- Pages
- 110-124
- ISSN
- 0140-3664 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3111288713
- Cited by
- 316
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 16.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.