Cited by 90Topological and Geometric Data Analysis3D Shape Modeling and AnalysisGeometric and Algebraic Topology

Localized homology

Open access
Zomorodian, Afra, Carlsson, Gunnar·2008·Computational Geometry

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.comgeo.2008.02.003

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The projection pΣ: M(|Σ|,S) → |Σ| is a homotopy equivalence.

    “It can be shown that p Σ is a homotopy equivalence (see [65]).”

    From Topology and data (2009) · cites this paper as [65]

  • By using persistence, one can develop a systematic way of addressing questions of the source of features; the methodology is described in [65].

    “By using persistence, one is able to develop a systematic way of addressing such questions.That methodology has been described in [65].”

    From Topology and data (2009) · cites this paper as [65]

  • Persistent homology is able to bridge geometry and topology, leading to a new efficient approach for the simplification of biological structural complexity.

    “Persistent homology22–25—a new branch of algebraic topology—is able to bridge geometry and topology, leading to a new efficient approach for the simplification of biological structural complexity26–31; however, it neglects critical chemical/biological information when it is directly applied to complex biomolecular structures.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 35 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [18]18. A. Hatcher, Algebraic Topology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2002.
  2. [26]26. B. Naylor, J. Amanatides, W. Thibault, Merging BSP trees yield polyhedral modeling results, in: Proc. SIGGRAPH, 1990, pp. 115-124.
  3. [30]30. A. Zomorodian, Topology for Computing, Cambridge University Press, New York, 2005.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zomorodian, A., & Carlsson, G.
Affiliations
  • Dartmouth College (US)
  • Stanford University (US)
Corresponding author
Zomorodian, Afra
Venue
Computational Geometry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-11
Volume
41
Issue
3
Pages
126-148
ISSN
0925-7721 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2912929541
Cited by
89
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 3
FWCI
9.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Computational Geometry (publishedVersion)
Funders
Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (HR0011, HR0011-05-1-0007)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Topological and Geometric Data Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › 3D Shape Modeling and Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Geometry and Topology › Geometric and Algebraic Topology
Keywords
tunnels, voids, topological data analysis, homology computation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review