The DOI matches its Crossref record; 43 of the 43 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Accurate projected augmented wave (PAW) datasets for rare-earth elements (RE=La–Lu)
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“All the data produced in this work is freely available on the Materials Cloud online platform [11], where the user can interactively browse the results and explore the data provenance.”
From Precision and efficiency in solid-state pseudopotential calculations (2018) · cites this paper as [11]
Citations
Cites
Generalized Gradient Approximation Made Simple
Perdew, J. P., Burke, K., & Ernzerhof, M. (1996) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.77.3865 · Cited by 215,824
Projector augmented-wave method
Blöchl, P. E. (1994) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.50.17953 · Cited by 92,732
From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented-wave method
Kresse, G., & Joubert, D. (1999) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.59.1758 · Cited by 85,307
Self-Consistent Equations Including Exchange and Correlation Effects
Kohn, W., & Sham, L. J. (1965) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.140.a1133 · Cited by 64,135
QUANTUM ESPRESSO: a modular and open-source software project for quantum simulations of materials
Giannozzi, P., Baroni, S., Bonini, N., Calandra, M., Car, R., Cavazzoni, C., Ceresoli, D., Chiarotti, G., Cococcioni, M., Dabo, I., et al. (2009) · Journal of Physics Condensed Matter · doi:10.1088/0953-8984/21/39/395502 · Cited by 29,793
Self-citationAccurate and simple analytic representation of the electron-gas correlation energy
Perdew, J. P., & Wang, Y. (1992) · Physical review. B, Condensed matter · doi:10.1103/physrevb.45.13244 · Cited by 25,265
Soft self-consistent pseudopotentials in a generalized eigenvalue formalism
Vanderbilt, D. (1990) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.41.7892 · Cited by 23,185
Efficient pseudopotentials for plane-wave calculations
Troullier, N., & Martins, J. L. (1991) · Physical review. B, Condensed matter · doi:10.1103/physrevb.43.1993 · Cited by 16,222
Electron-energy-loss spectra and the structural stability of nickel oxide: An LSDA+U study
Dudarev, S. L., Botton, G. A., Savrasov, S. Y., Humphreys, C. J., & Sutton, A. P. (1998) · Physical review. B, Condensed matter · doi:10.1103/physrevb.57.1505 · Cited by 15,260
The SIESTA method for ab initio order- N materials simulation
Soler, J. M., Artacho, E., Gale, J. D., Garcı́a, A., Junquera, J., Ordejón, P., & Sánchez‐Portal, D. (2002) · Journal of Physics Condensed Matter · doi:10.1088/0953-8984/14/11/302 · Cited by 12,414
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- Gschneidner, 1981, Am. Chem. Soc.
- Soler, 2002, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter, 14, 2745
- Giannozzi, 2009, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter, 21, 395502
- Lejaeghere, 2014, Crit. Rev. Solid State Mater. Sci., 39
- Pies, 2006, Landolt-Börnstein, vol. 7c1
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Q uantum ESPRESSO toward the exascale
Giannozzi, P., Baseggio, O., Bonfà, P., Brunato, D., Car, R., Carnimeo, I., Cavazzoni, C., de Gironcoli, S., Delugas, P., Ruffino, F. F., et al. (2020) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/5.0005082 · Cited by 2,197
Mounet, N., Gibertini, M., Schwaller, P., Campi, D., Merkys, A., Marrazzo, A., Sohier, T., Castelli, I. E., Cepellotti, A., Pizzi, G., et al. (2018) · Nature Nanotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41565-017-0035-5 · Cited by 1,863
Precision and efficiency in solid-state pseudopotential calculations
Prandini, G., Marrazzo, A., Castelli, I. E., Mounet, N., & Marzari, N. (2018) · npj Computational Materials · doi:10.1038/s41524-018-0127-2 · Cited by 917
Ultrafast control of magnetic interactions via light-driven phonons
Afanasiev, D., Hortensius, J. R., Ivanov, B. A., Sasani, A., Bousquet, É., Blanter, Y. M., Mikhaylovskiy, R. V., Kimel, A. V., & Caviglia, A. D. (2021) · Nature Materials · doi:10.1038/s41563-021-00922-7 · Cited by 254
Machine learning the Hubbard U parameter in DFT+U using Bayesian optimization
Yu, M., Yang, S., Wu, C., & Marom, N. (2020) · npj Computational Materials · doi:10.1038/s41524-020-00446-9 · Cited by 203
Metadata
- Authors
- Topsakal, M., & Wentzcovitch, R. M.
- Affiliations
- University of Minnesota (US)
- Corresponding author
- Topsakal, M.
- Venue
- Computational Materials Science
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-12
- Volume
- 95
- Pages
- 263-270
- ISSN
- 0927-0256 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2025595095
- Cited by
- 232
- References
- 43
- Citations by year
- 2026: 23 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 35 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 4.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Computational Materials Science (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation
- Vanderbilt University
- Materials Research Science and Engineering Center, Harvard University
- Division of Materials Research
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Advanced Chemical Physics Studies
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Machine Learning in Materials Science
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Condensed Matter Physics › Rare-earth and actinide compounds
- Keywords
- rare earth elements, rare earth nitrides, Hubbard U parameter, density of states, equation of state, hybrid functionals, open-source dataset
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
