Cited by 313Advanced Chemical Physics StudiesMachine Learning in Materials ScienceThermodynamic and Structural Properties of Metals and Alloys

Generation of Projector Augmented-Wave atomic data: A 71 element validated table in the XML format

Open access
Jollet, François, Torrent, Marc, Holzwarth, Natalie·2014·Computer Physics Communications

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cpc.2013.12.023

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Using the SSSP protocol, the authors identify two optimal PSP libraries, named SSSP efficiency and SSSP precision (version 1.1).

    “Leveraging the SSSP protocol, we identify two optimal PSP libraries, named SSSP efficiency and SSSP precision (version 1.1), that provide thoroughly tested and precise PSPs for 85 elements of the periodic table, selected from publicly available PSP libraries [16-22], for which the original authors should be acknowledged.”
  • The SSSP efficiency and SSSP precision libraries (version 1.1) provide thoroughly tested and precise PSPs for 85 elements of the periodic table, selected from publicly available PSP libraries.

    “Leveraging the SSSP protocol, we identify two optimal PSP libraries, named SSSP efficiency and SSSP precision (version 1.1), that provide thoroughly tested and precise PSPs for 85 elements of the periodic table, selected from publicly available PSP libraries [16-22], for which the original authors should be acknowledged.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jollet, F., Torrent, M., & Holzwarth, N.
Affiliations
  • Commissariat à l'Énergie Atomique et aux Énergies Alternatives (FR)
  • Wake Forest University (US)
Venue
Computer Physics Communications
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-04
Volume
185
Issue
4
Pages
1246-1254
ISSN
0010-4655 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2122617276
Cited by
313
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 37 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 32 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 3
FWCI
8.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Computer Physics Communications (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
National Science Foundation (DMR-1105485)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Advanced Chemical Physics Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Machine Learning in Materials Science
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Thermodynamic and Structural Properties of Metals and Alloys
Keywords
projector augmented wave method, pseudopotentials, transferability, XML data format, periodic table elements, electronic structure simulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review