Cited by 12Air Traffic Management and OptimizationAdvanced Aircraft Design and TechnologiesNoise Effects and Management

Fuel- and noise-minimal departure trajectory using deep reinforcement learning with aircraft dynamics and topography constraints

Open access
Nguyen, Chris HC., Shihua, James M., Liem, Rhea P.·2025·Communications in Transportation Research

Abstract

Designing an optimal departure trajectory for an airport can minimize fuel emissions within the surrounding airspace and noise perceived by nearby populations, which brings positive sociological and economic implications in addition to environmental benefits. Yet, designing a trajectory that considers realistic operational constraints could be complex and, consequently, computationally expensive. Traditional trajectory optimization methods often simplify the problem to manage computational costs, which leads to compromised accuracy. To overcome this challenge, we propose a reinforcement learning (RL) approach that can satisfy multidisciplinary constraints by leveraging accurately modeled flight dynamics, high-fidelity population data, and topological data. This is achieved by establishing a comprehensive, physically-consistent simulated environment for the learning algorithm, while keeping the computational cost low. Instead of directly designing the trajectory itself, we train an RL agent to control the aircraft, whose trajectory is then considered as optimal. We model the RL problem as a continuous Markov decision process and employ the soft actor-critic architecture. By changing the relative importance of fuel consumption and noise in the optimization objective, we can obtain different optimum trajectories that are well-suited to the specific region of interest. Not surprisingly, a trade-off between fuel consumption and noise impact is observed in our results. This develop…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.commtr.2025.100165

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 53 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nguyen, C. H., Shihua, J. M., & Liem, R. P.
Affiliations
Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (HK)
Corresponding author
Liem, Rhea P.
Venue
Communications in Transportation Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2025-12
Volume
5
Pages
100165
ISSN
2772-4247 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4408361925
Cited by
12
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 6
FWCI
4.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Communications in Transportation Research (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Rare & Special e-Zone (The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Innovation and Technology Commission - Hong Kong
  • University Grants Committee
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Air Traffic Management and Optimization
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Advanced Aircraft Design and Technologies
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › Noise Effects and Management
Keywords
aircraft noise, fuel consumption, deep reinforcement learning, soft actor-critic, flight dynamics, Markov decision process, sustainable aviation, airspace design

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review