Cited by 51Effects of Environmental Stressors on LivestockWind and Air Flow StudiesBuilding Energy and Comfort Optimization

Improving the representation of thermal boundary conditions of livestock during CFD modelling of the indoor environment

Norton, Tomás, Grant, Jim, Fallon, Richard, Sun, Da-Wen·2010·Computers and Electronics in Agriculture

Abstract

The use of computational fluid dynamics (CFD) to evaluate the climate distribution in agricultural buildings has grown in importance in recent years. Convection and radiation are the dominant forms of heat transfer from an animal's body, and accurately accounting for animal heat flux during CFD simulations is necessary to achieving a good understanding of the livestock‘s thermal environment. Of the total heat flux leaving the animal, the convective part is regularly calculated using a predetermined ratio between the convective to radiative parts (C-R ratio). However, by employing this ratio the CFD modeller is essentially forcing the simulated animal to lose a certain amount of convective heat, irrespective of the environmental conditions at their location. Therefore, unless the indoor environment is known a priori to a CFD simulation, and unless this environment is totally uniform, the C-R ratio ascribed to some of the simulated animals will be less precise. In order to address this difficulty the authors of this study have used a zero-dimensional calf heat transfer model to account for calf thermoregulation during CFD simulations. The effect of using this representation of calf heat flux was analysed for practical housing scenarios and differences in the predicted airflow distribution patterns were found to occur between the simulations that used a fixed and dynamic relationship for calf heat flux partitioning.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.compag.2010.04.002

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Norton, T., Grant, J., Fallon, R., & Sun, D.-W.
Affiliations
  • University College Dublin (IE)
  • Teagasc - The Irish Agriculture and Food Development Authority (IE)
Corresponding author
Sun, Da-Wen
Venue
Computers and Electronics in Agriculture
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-07
Volume
73
Issue
1
Pages
17-36
ISSN
0168-1699 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1994532998
Cited by
51
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 1
FWCI
3.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Computers and Electronics in Agriculture (publishedVersion)
  • Lirias (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Effects of Environmental Stressors on Livestock
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Wind and Air Flow Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Building Energy and Comfort Optimization
Keywords
thermal boundary conditions, zero-dimensional model, air distribution, animal housing, indoor climate

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review