Improving the representation of thermal boundary conditions of livestock during CFD modelling of the indoor environment
Abstract
The use of computational fluid dynamics (CFD) to evaluate the climate distribution in agricultural buildings has grown in importance in recent years. Convection and radiation are the dominant forms of heat transfer from an animal's body, and accurately accounting for animal heat flux during CFD simulations is necessary to achieving a good understanding of the livestock‘s thermal environment. Of the total heat flux leaving the animal, the convective part is regularly calculated using a predetermined ratio between the convective to radiative parts (C-R ratio). However, by employing this ratio the CFD modeller is essentially forcing the simulated animal to lose a certain amount of convective heat, irrespective of the environmental conditions at their location. Therefore, unless the indoor environment is known a priori to a CFD simulation, and unless this environment is totally uniform, the C-R ratio ascribed to some of the simulated animals will be less precise. In order to address this difficulty the authors of this study have used a zero-dimensional calf heat transfer model to account for calf thermoregulation during CFD simulations. The effect of using this representation of calf heat flux was analysed for practical housing scenarios and differences in the predicted airflow distribution patterns were found to occur between the simulations that used a fixed and dynamic relationship for calf heat flux partitioning.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Simply equalizing air temperature and MRT could overestimate radiant heat exchange particularly in hot climates.
“However, simply equalizing the air temperature and MRT could overestimate the radiant heat exchange particularly in hot climates (Mount, 1964; Norton et al., 2010).”
From A two-node mechanistic thermophysiological model for pigs reared in hot climates – Part 2: Model performance assessments (2021) · cites this paper as Norton et al., 2010
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Li, H., Rong, L., & Zhang, G. (2018) · Computers and Electronics in Agriculture · doi:10.1016/j.compag.2017.08.013 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Huang, T., Rong, L., Zhang, G., Brandt, P., Bjerg, B., Pedersen, P., & Granath, S. W. L. (2021) · Biosystems Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2021.08.021 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
- Authors
- Norton, T., Grant, J., Fallon, R., & Sun, D.-W.
- Affiliations
- University College Dublin (IE)
- Teagasc - The Irish Agriculture and Food Development Authority (IE)
- Corresponding author
- Sun, Da-Wen
- Venue
- Computers and Electronics in Agriculture
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2010-07
- Volume
- 73
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 17-36
- ISSN
- 0168-1699 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1994532998
- Cited by
- 51
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 3.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Computers and Electronics in Agriculture (publishedVersion)
- Lirias (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Effects of Environmental Stressors on Livestock
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Wind and Air Flow Studies
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Building Energy and Comfort Optimization
- Keywords
- thermal boundary conditions, zero-dimensional model, air distribution, animal housing, indoor climate
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review