The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Few-Shot Learning approach for plant disease classification using images taken in the field
Abstract
Abstract Prompt plant disease detection is critical to prevent plagues and to mitigate their effects on crops. The most accurate automatic algorithms for plant disease identification using plant field images are based on deep learning. These methods require the acquisition and annotation of large image datasets, which is frequently technically or economically unfeasible. This study introduces Few-Shot Learning (FSL) algorithms for plant leaf classification using deep learning with small datasets. For the study 54,303 labeled images from the PlantVillage dataset were used, comprising 38 plant leaf and/or disease types (classes). The data was split into a source (32 classes) and a target (6 classes) domain. The Inception V3 network was fine-tuned in the source domain to learn general plant leaf characteristics. This knowledge was transferred to the target domain to learn new leaf types from few images. FSL using Siamese networks and Triplet loss was used and compared to classical fine-tuning transfer learning. The source and target domain sets were split into a training set (80%) to develop the methods and a test set (20%) to obtain the results. Algorithm performance was evaluated using the total accuracy, and the precision and recall per class. For the FSL experiments the algorithms were trained with different numbers of images per class and the experiments were repeated 20 times to statistically characterize the results. The accuracy in the source domain was 91.4% (32 classes), with a median precision/recall per class of 93.8%/92.6%. The accuracy in the target domain was 94.0% (6 classes) learning from all the training data, and the median accuracy (90% confidence interval) learning from 1 image per class was 55.5 (46.0–61.7)%. Median accuracies of 80.0 (76.4–86.5)% and 90.0 (86.1–94.2)% were reached for 15 and 80 images per class, yielding a reduction of 89.1% (80 images/class) in the training dataset with only a 4-point loss in accuracy. The FSL method outperformed the classical fine tuning transfer learning which had accuracies of 18.0 (16.0–24.0)% and 72.0 (68.0–77.3)% for 1 and 80 images per class, respectively. It is possible to learn new plant leaf and disease types with very small datasets using deep learning Siamese networks with Triplet loss, achieving almost a 90% reduction in training data needs and outperforming classical learning techniques for small training sets.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition
He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., & Sun, J. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.90 · Cited by 235,474
ImageNet: A large-scale hierarchical image database
Deng, J., Dong, W., Socher, R., Li, L.-J., Li, K., & Fei-Fei, L. (2009) · 2009 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2009.5206848 · Cited by 65,333
Cortes, C., & Vapnik, V. (1995) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1007/bf00994018 · Cited by 59,421
Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Vision
Szegedy, C., Vanhoucke, V., Ioffe, S., Shlens, J., & Wojna, Z. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.308 · Cited by 32,138
Generalizing from a Few Examples: A Survey on Few-shot Learning
Wang, Y., Yao, Q., Kwok, J. T., & Ni, L. M. (2021) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3386252 · Cited by 3,165
Generalized Zero- and Few-Shot Learning via Aligned Variational Autoencoders
Schönfeld, E., Ebrahimi, S., Sinha, S., Darrell, T., & Akata, Z. (2019) · 2019 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2019.00844 · Cited by 747
Cited by
Deep metric learning for few-shot image classification: A Review of recent developments
Li, X., Yang, X., Ma, Z., & Xue, J.-H. (2023) · Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1016/j.patcog.2023.109381 · Cited by 243
Entropy-based redundancy analysis and information screening
Li, Y., Yang, J., & Wen, J. (2023) · Digital Communications and Networks · doi:10.1016/j.dcan.2021.12.001 · Cited by 77
Metadata
- Authors
- Argüeso, D., Picon, A., Irusta, U., Medela, A., San-Emeterio, M. G., Bereciartua, A., & Alvarez-Gila, A.
- Venue
- Computers and Electronics in Agriculture
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-08
- Volume
- 175
- Pages
- 105542
- ISSN
- 0168-1699 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3035982802
- Cited by
- 369
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 27.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Few-Shot Learning approach for plant disease classification using images taken in the field. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.compag.2020.105542
- The paper
- Argüeso, D., Picon, A., Irusta, U., Medela, A., San-Emeterio, M. G., Bereciartua, A., & Alvarez-Gila, A. (2020). Few-Shot Learning approach for plant disease classification using images taken in the field. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2020.105542
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.