Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 369

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Few-Shot Learning approach for plant disease classification using images taken in the field

Argüeso, David, Picon, Artzai, Irusta, Unai, Medela, Alfonso, San-Emeterio, Miguel G, Bereciartua, Arantza, Alvarez-Gila, Aitor·2020·Computers and Electronics in Agriculture

Abstract

Abstract Prompt plant disease detection is critical to prevent plagues and to mitigate their effects on crops. The most accurate automatic algorithms for plant disease identification using plant field images are based on deep learning. These methods require the acquisition and annotation of large image datasets, which is frequently technically or economically unfeasible. This study introduces Few-Shot Learning (FSL) algorithms for plant leaf classification using deep learning with small datasets. For the study 54,303 labeled images from the PlantVillage dataset were used, comprising 38 plant leaf and/or disease types (classes). The data was split into a source (32 classes) and a target (6 classes) domain. The Inception V3 network was fine-tuned in the source domain to learn general plant leaf characteristics. This knowledge was transferred to the target domain to learn new leaf types from few images. FSL using Siamese networks and Triplet loss was used and compared to classical fine-tuning transfer learning. The source and target domain sets were split into a training set (80%) to develop the methods and a test set (20%) to obtain the results. Algorithm performance was evaluated using the total accuracy, and the precision and recall per class. For the FSL experiments the algorithms were trained with different numbers of images per class and the experiments were repeated 20 times to statistically characterize the results. The accuracy in the source domain was 91.4% (32 classes), with a median precision/recall per class of 93.8%/92.6%. The accuracy in the target domain was 94.0% (6 classes) learning from all the training data, and the median accuracy (90% confidence interval) learning from 1 image per class was 55.5 (46.0–61.7)%. Median accuracies of 80.0 (76.4–86.5)% and 90.0 (86.1–94.2)% were reached for 15 and 80 images per class, yielding a reduction of 89.1% (80 images/class) in the training dataset with only a 4-point loss in accuracy. The FSL method outperformed the classical fine tuning transfer learning which had accuracies of 18.0 (16.0–24.0)% and 72.0 (68.0–77.3)% for 1 and 80 images per class, respectively. It is possible to learn new plant leaf and disease types with very small datasets using deep learning Siamese networks with Triplet loss, achieving almost a 90% reduction in training data needs and outperforming classical learning techniques for small training sets.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.compag.2020.105542

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 6 references

Cited by

See all 369

Metadata

Authors
Argüeso, D., Picon, A., Irusta, U., Medela, A., San-Emeterio, M. G., Bereciartua, A., & Alvarez-Gila, A.
Venue
Computers and Electronics in Agriculture
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-08
Volume
175
Pages
105542
ISSN
0168-1699 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3035982802
Cited by
369
References
6
FWCI
27.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Few-Shot Learning approach for plant disease classification using images taken in the field. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.compag.2020.105542
The paper
Argüeso, D., Picon, A., Irusta, U., Medela, A., San-Emeterio, M. G., Bereciartua, A., & Alvarez-Gila, A. (2020). Few-Shot Learning approach for plant disease classification using images taken in the field. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2020.105542

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.