The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Crop yield prediction using machine learning: A systematic literature review
Open accessAbstract
Machine learning is an important decision support tool for crop yield prediction, including supporting decisions on what crops to grow and what to do during the growing season of the crops. Several machine learning algorithms have been applied to support crop yield prediction research. In this study, we performed a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) to extract and synthesize the algorithms and features that have been used in crop yield prediction studies. Based on our search criteria, we retrieved 567 relevant studies from six electronic databases, of which we have selected 50 studies for further analysis using inclusion and exclusion criteria. We investigated these selected studies carefully, analyzed the methods and features used, and provided suggestions for further research. According to our analysis, the most used features are temperature, rainfall, and soil type, and the most applied algorithm is Artificial Neural Networks in these models. After this observation based on the analysis of machine learning-based 50 papers, we performed an additional search in electronic databases to identify deep learning-based studies, reached 30 deep learning-based papers, and extracted the applied deep learning algorithms. According to this additional analysis, Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) is the most widely used deep learning algorithm in these studies, and the other widely used deep learning algorithms are Long-Short Term Memory (LSTM) and Deep Neural Networks (DNN).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networks
Ren, S., He, K., Girshick, R., & Sun, J. (2015) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1506.01497 · Cited by 70,812
Human-level control through deep reinforcement learning
Mnih, V., Kavukcuoglu, K., Silver, D., Rusu, A. A., Veness, J., Bellemare, M. G., Graves, A., Riedmiller, M., Fidjeland, A. K., Ostrovski, G., et al. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14236 · Cited by 30,357
Machine Learning in Agriculture: A Review
Liakos, K., Busato, P., Moshou, D., Pearson, S., & Bochtis, D. (2018) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s18082674 · Cited by 3,441
A Survey on Multi-Task Learning
Zhang, Y., & Yang, Q. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1707.08114 · Cited by 2,910
A CNN-RNN framework for crop yield prediction
Khaki, S., Wang, L., & Archontoulis, S. V. (2020) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2019.01750 · Cited by 722
Cited by
Rashid, M., Bari, B. S., Yusup, Y., Kamaruddin, M. A., & Khan, N. (2021) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2021.3075159 · Cited by 369
Data-driven artificial intelligence applications for sustainable precision agriculture
Linaza, M. T., Posada, J., Bund, J., Eisert, P., Quartulli, M., Döllner, J., Pagani, A., G. Olaizola, I., Barriguinha, A., Moysiadis, T., et al. (2021) · Agronomy · doi:10.3390/agronomy11061227 · Cited by 310
Ouhami, M., Hafiane, A., Es-Saady, Y., El Hajji, M., & Canals, R. (2021) · Remote Sensing · doi:10.3390/rs13132486 · Cited by 264
Condran, S., Bewong, M., Islam, M. Z., Maphosa, L., & Zheng, L. (2022) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2022.3188649 · Cited by 99
Danilevicz, M. F., Bayer, P. E., Boussaid, F., Bennamoun, M., & Edwards, D. (2021) · Remote Sensing · doi:10.3390/rs13193976 · Cited by 75
Metadata
- Authors
- van Klompenburg, T., Kassahun, A., & Catal, C.
- Venue
- Computers and Electronics in Agriculture
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-10
- Volume
- 177
- Pages
- 105709
- ISSN
- 0168-1699 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3079760979
- Cited by
- 1,858
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 19.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Crop yield prediction using machine learning: A systematic literature review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.compag.2020.105709
- The paper
- van Klompenburg, T., Kassahun, A., & Catal, C. (2020). Crop yield prediction using machine learning: A systematic literature review. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2020.105709
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.