Cited by 58Protein Structure and DynamicsStatistical and numerical algorithmsEnzyme Structure and Function

HELFIT: Helix fitting by a total least squares method

Enkhbayar, Purevjav, Damdinsuren, Sodov, Osaki, Mitsuru, Matsushima, Norio·2008·Computational Biology and Chemistry

Abstract

The problem of fitting a helix to data arises in analysis of protein structure, in nuclear physics, and in engineering. A continuous helix is described by five parameters: helix axis, helix radius, and helix pitch. One of these helix parameters is frequently predefined in the helix fitting. Other algorithms find only the helix axis or determine separately the helix axis, the helix radius, or the helix pitch. Here we describe a total least squares method, HELFIT, for helix fitting. HELFIT enables one to calculate simultaneously all five of the helix parameters with high accuracy. The minimum number of data points required for the analysis is only four. HELFIT is very insensitive to noise even in short helices. HELFIT also calculates a parameter, p=rmsd/(N-1)(1/2), which estimates the regularity of helical structures independent of the number of data points, where rmsd is the root mean square distance from the best-fit helix to data points and N is the number of data points. It should become a basic tool of structural bioinformatics.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.compbiolchem.2008.03.012

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The BISON CRISPR library targets 713 E1, E2, and E3 ubiquitin ligases, deubiquitinases, and control genes and contains 2,852 guide RNAs.

    “The BISON CRISPR library targets 713 E1, E2, and E3 ubiquitin ligases, deubiquitinases, and control genes and contains 2,852 guide RNAs.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Enkhbayar, P., Damdinsuren, S., Osaki, M., & Matsushima, N.
Affiliations
  • Sapporo Medical University (JP)
  • National University of Mongolia (MN)
  • Hokkaido University (JP)
Corresponding author
Matsushima, Norio
Venue
Computational Biology and Chemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-08
Volume
32
Issue
4
Pages
307-310
ISSN
1476-9271 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2038862514
Cited by
58
References
16
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 2
FWCI
0.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Computational Biology and Chemistry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
University of Virginia
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Applied Mathematics › Statistical and numerical algorithms
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Enzyme Structure and Function
Keywords
total least squares, helix radius, helical pitch, structural bioinformatics, protein structure analysis, noise immunity
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Proteins, Software, Least-Squares Analysis, Protein Structure, Secondary, Computational Biology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review