Cited by 238Nutrition, Genetics, and DiseaseArtificial Intelligence in HealthcareArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education

Precision nutrition: A systematic literature review

Open access
Kirk, Daniel, Catal, Cagatay, Tekinerdogan, Bedir·2021·Computers in Biology and Medicine

Abstract

Precision Nutrition research aims to use personal information about individuals or groups of individuals to deliver nutritional advice that, theoretically, would be more suitable than generic advice. Machine learning, a subbranch of Artificial Intelligence, has promise to aid in the development of predictive models that are suitable for Precision Nutrition. As such, recent research has applied machine learning algorithms, tools, and techniques in precision nutrition for different purposes. However, a systematic overview of the state-of-the-art on the use of machine learning in Precision Nutrition is lacking. Therefore, we carried out a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) to provide an overview of where and how machine learning has been used in Precision Nutrition from various aspects, what such machine learning models use as input features, what the availability status of the data used in the literature is, and how the models are evaluated. Nine research questions were defined in this study. We retrieved 4930 papers from electronic databases and 60 primary studies were selected to respond to the research questions. All of the selected primary studies were also briefly discussed in this article. Our results show that fifteen problems spread across seven domains of nutrition and health are present. Four machine learning tasks are seen in the form of regression, classification, recommendation and clustering, with most of these utilizing a supervised approach. In total, 30 algorithms were used, with 19 appearing more than once. Models were through the use of four groups of approaches and 23 evaluation metrics. Personalized approaches are promising to reduce the burden of these current problems in nutrition research, and the current review shows Machine Learning can be incorporated into Precision Nutrition research with high performance. Precision Nutrition researchers should consider incorporating Machine Learning into their methods to facilitate the integration of many complex features, allowing for the development of high-performance Precision Nutrition approaches.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2021.104365

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 127 · Cited by 238

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. K.P. Murphy, Machine Learning: a Probabilistic Perspective (Adaptive Computation and Machine Learning Series), Mit Press, 2012.

Authors
Kirk, D., Catal, C., & Tekinerdogan, B.
Affiliations
  • Wageningen University & Research (NL)
  • Qatar University (QA)
Corresponding author
Catal, Cagatay
Venue
Computers in Biology and Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-06
Volume
133
Pages
104365
ISSN
0010-4825 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3145026862
Cited by
238
References
127
Citations by year
2026: 49 · 2025: 73 · 2024: 51 · 2023: 34 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 6
FWCI
4.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Computers in Biology and Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Qatar University QSpace (Qatar University) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Qatar National Library
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Nutrition, Genetics, and Disease
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Keywords
personalized nutrition, machine learning, nutritional advice, prediction model, supervised learning, regression analysis, classification, recommender systems, clustering, model evaluation metrics, input features, artificial intelligence in nutrition
MeSH terms
Machine Learning, Algorithms, Artificial Intelligence, Humans, Nutritional Status, Databases, Factual

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review