The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
LungNet: A hybrid deep-CNN model for lung cancer diagnosis using CT and wearable sensor-based medical IoT data
Abstract
Lung cancer, also known as pulmonary cancer, is one of the deadliest cancers, but yet curable if detected at the early stage. At present, the ambiguous features of the lung cancer nodule make the computer-aided automatic diagnosis a challenging task. To alleviate this, we present LungNet, a novel hybrid deep-convolutional neural network-based model, trained with CT scan and wearable sensor-based medical IoT (MIoT) data. LungNet consists of a unique 22-layers Convolutional Neural Network (CNN), which combines latent features that are learned from CT scan images and MIoT data to enhance the diagnostic accuracy of the system. Operated from a centralized server, the network has been trained with a balanced dataset having 525,000 images that can classify lung cancer into five classes with high accuracy (96.81%) and low false positive rate (3.35%), outperforming similar CNN-based classifiers. Moreover, it classifies the stage-1 and stage-2 lung cancers into 1A, 1B, 2A and 2B sub-classes with 91.6% accuracy and false positive rate of 7.25%. High predictive capability accompanied with sub-stage classification renders LungNet as a promising prospect in developing CNN-based automatic lung cancer diagnosis systems.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Armato, S. G., McLennan, G., Bidaut, L., McNitt‐Gray, M. F., Meyer, C. R., Reeves, A. P., Zhao, B., Aberle, D. R., Henschke, C. I., Hoffman, E. A., et al. (2011) · Medical Physics · doi:10.1118/1.3528204 · Cited by 2,887
Masood, A., Sheng, B., Li, P., Hou, X., Wei, X., Qin, J., & Feng, D. (2018) · Journal of Biomedical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2018.01.005 · Cited by 292
Lei, H., Xu, H.-Z., Shan, H.-Z., Liu, M., Lu, Y., Fang, Z.-X., Jin, J., Jing, B., Xiao, X.-H., Gao, S.-M., et al. (2021) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-020-20259-0 · Cited by 146
Cited by
A Novel Deep Learning-Based Intrusion Detection System for IoT Networks
Awajan, A. (2023) · Computers · doi:10.3390/computers12020034 · Cited by 292
Akter, A., Nosheen, N., Ahmed, S., Hossain, M., Yousuf, M. A., Almoyad, M. A. A., Hasan, K. F., & Moni, M. A. (2024) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2023.122347 · Cited by 264
Self-citationWearable Healthcare and Continuous Vital Sign Monitoring with IoT Integration
Taherdoost, H. (2024) · Computers, Materials & Continua · doi:10.32604/cmc.2024.054378 · Cited by 47
Metadata
- Authors
- Faruqui, N., Yousuf, M. A., Whaiduzzaman, M., Azad, A. K. M., Barros, A., & Moni, M. A.
- Venue
- Computers in Biology and Medicine
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-12
- Volume
- 139
- Pages
- 104961
- ISSN
- 0010-4825 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3208458519
- Cited by
- 185
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 11.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: LungNet: A hybrid deep-CNN model for lung cancer diagnosis using CT and wearable sensor-based medical IoT data. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2021.104961
- The paper
- Faruqui, N., Yousuf, M. A., Whaiduzzaman, M., Azad, A. K. M., Barros, A., & Moni, M. A. (2021). LungNet: A hybrid deep-CNN model for lung cancer diagnosis using CT and wearable sensor-based medical IoT data. Computers in Biology and Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2021.104961
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.