Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 264

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 50 of the 50 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Robust clinical applicable CNN and U-Net based algorithm for MRI classification and segmentation for brain tumor

Open access
Akter, Atika, Nosheen, Nazeela, Ahmed, Sabbir, Hossain, Mariom, Yousuf, Mohammad Abu, Almoyad, Mohammad Ali Abdullah, Hasan, Khondokar Fida, Moni, Mohammad Ali·2024·Expert Systems with Applications

Abstract

Early diagnosis of brain tumors is critical for enhancing patient prognosis and treatment options, while accurate classification and segmentation of brain tumors are vital for developing personalized treatment strategies. Despite the widespread use of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) for brain examination and advances in AI-based detection methods, building an accurate and efficient model for detecting and categorizing tumors from MRI images remains a challenge. To address this problem, we proposed a deep Convolutional Neural Network (CNN)-based architecture for automatic brain image classification into four classes and a U-Net-based segmentation model. Using six benchmarked datasets, we tested the classification model and trained the segmentation model, enabling side-by-side comparison of the impact of segmentation on tumor classification in brain MRI images. We also evaluated two classification methods based on accuracy, recall, precision, and AUC. Our developed novel deep learning-based model for brain tumor classification and segmentation outperforms existing pre-trained models across all six datasets. The results demonstrate that our classification model achieved the highest accuracy of 98.7% in a merged dataset and 98.8% with the segmentation approach, with the highest classification accuracy reaching 97.7% among the four individual datasets. Thus, this novel framework could be applicable in clinics for the automatic identification and segmentation of brain tumors utilizing MRI scan input images.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.eswa.2023.122347

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 50 references

Metadata

Authors
Akter, A., Nosheen, N., Ahmed, S., Hossain, M., Yousuf, M. A., Almoyad, M. A. A., Hasan, K. F., & Moni, M. A.
Venue
Expert Systems with Applications
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-03
Volume
238
Pages
122347
ISSN
0957-4174 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4388190812
Cited by
264
References
50
FWCI
21.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Robust clinical applicable CNN and U-Net based algorithm for MRI classification and segmentation for brain tumor. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.eswa.2023.122347
The paper
Akter, A., Nosheen, N., Ahmed, S., Hossain, M., Yousuf, M. A., Almoyad, M. A. A., Hasan, K. F., & Moni, M. A. (2024). Robust clinical applicable CNN and U-Net based algorithm for MRI classification and segmentation for brain tumor. Expert Systems with Applications. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2023.122347

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.