Cited by 81AI in cancer detectionCell Image Analysis TechniquesMedical Image Segmentation Techniques

Cx22: a new publicly available dataset for deep learning-based segmentation of cervical cytology images

Liu, Guangqi, Ding, Qinghai, Luo, Haibo, Sha, Min, Li, Xiang, Ju, Moran·2022·Computers in Biology and Medicine

Abstract

The segmentation of cervical cytology images plays an important role in the automatic analysis of cervical cytology screening. Although deep learning-based segmentation methods are well-developed in other image segmentation areas, their application in the segmentation of cervical cytology images is still in the early stage. The most important reason for the slow progress is the lack of publicly available and high-quality datasets, and the study on the deep learning-based segmentation methods may be hampered by the present datasets which are either artificial or plagued by the issue of false-negative objects. In this paper, we develop a new dataset of cervical cytology images named Cx22, which consists of the completely annotated labels of the cellular instances based on the open-source images released by our institute previously. Firstly, we meticulously delineate the contours of 14,946 cellular instances in1320 images that are generated by our proposed ROI-based label cropping algorithm. Then, we propose the baseline methods for the deep learning-based semantic and instance segmentation tasks based on Cx22. Finally, through the experiments, we validate the task suitability of Cx22, and the results reveal the impact of false-negative objects on the performance of the baseline methods. Based on our work, Cx22 can provide a foundation for fellow researchers to develop high-performance deep learning-based methods for the segmentation of cervical cytology images. Other detailed information and step-by-step guidance on accessing the dataset are made available to fellow researchers at https://github.com/LGQ330/Cx22.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2022.106194

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Liu, G., Ding, Q., Luo, H., Sha, M., Li, X., & Ju, M.
Affiliations
  • Shenyang Institute of Automation (CN)
  • Northeastern University (CN)
  • Dalian Maritime University (CN)
Corresponding author
Luo, Haibo
Venue
Computers in Biology and Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-11
Volume
150
Pages
106194
ISSN
0010-4825 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4306167223
Cited by
81
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 27
FWCI
5.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Computers in Biology and Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in cancer detection
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biophysics › Cell Image Analysis Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
Keywords
cervical cell segmentation, instance segmentation, semantic segmentation, cervical cancer screening
MeSH terms
Deep Learning, Algorithms, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Semantics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review