Cited by 14Medical Image Segmentation TechniquesAI in cancer detectionRadiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

RAPHIA: A deep learning pipeline for the registration of MRI and whole-mount histopathology images of the prostate

Open access

Abstract

Image registration can map the ground truth extent of prostate cancer from histopathology images onto MRI, facilitating the development of machine learning methods for early prostate cancer detection. Here, we present RAdiology PatHology Image Alignment (RAPHIA), an end-to-end pipeline for efficient and accurate registration of MRI and histopathology images. RAPHIA automates several time-consuming manual steps in existing approaches including prostate segmentation, estimation of the rotation angle and horizontal flipping in histopathology images, and estimation of MRI-histopathology slice correspondences. By utilizing deep learning registration networks, RAPHIA substantially reduces computational time. Furthermore, RAPHIA obviates the need for a multimodal image similarity metric by transferring histopathology image representations to MRI image representations and vice versa. With the assistance of RAPHIA, novice users achieved expert-level performance, and their mean error in estimating histopathology rotation angle was reduced by 51% (12 degrees vs 8 degrees), their mean accuracy of estimating histopathology flipping was increased by 5% (95.3% vs 100%), and their mean error in estimating MRI-histopathology slice correspondences was reduced by 45% (1.12 slices vs 0.62 slices). When compared to a recent conventional registration approach and a deep learning registration approach, RAPHIA achieved better mapping of histopathology cancer labels, with an improved mean Dice coefficient of cancer regions outlined on MRI and the deformed histopathology (0.44 vs 0.48 vs 0.50), and a reduced mean per-case processing time (51 vs 11 vs 4.5 min). The improved performance by RAPHIA allows efficient processing of large datasets for the development of machine learning models for prostate cancer detection on MRI. Our code is publicly available at: https://github.com/pimed/RAPHIA.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2024.108318

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 31

  1. Siegel, 2022, Cancer statistics, 2022, CA: a Cancer J. Clin.
  2. Barentsz, 2016, Synopsis of the PI-RADS v2 guidelines for multiparametric prostate magnetic resonance imaging and recommendations for use, Eur. Urol., 69, 41, 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.08.038 · DOI
  3. Ahmed, 2017, Diagnostic accuracy of multi-parametric MRI and TRUS biopsy in prostate cancer (PROMIS): a paired validating confirmatory study, Lancet, 389, 815, 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)32401-1 · DOI
  4. Cao, 2019, Joint prostate cancer detection and gleason score prediction in mp-MRI via FocalNet, IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging, 38, 2496, 10.1109/TMI.2019.2901928 · DOI
  5. McGarry, 2019, Gleason probability maps: a radiomics tool for mapping prostate cancer likelihood in MRI space, Tomography, 5, 127, 10.18383/j.tom.2018.00033 · DOI
  6. Saha, 2021, End-to-end prostate cancer detection in bpMRI via 3D CNNs: Effects of attention mechanisms, clinical priori and decoupled false positive reduction, Med. Image Anal., 73, 10.1016/j.media.2021.102155 · DOI
  7. Seetharaman, 2021, Automated detection of aggressive and indolent prostate cancer on magnetic resonance imaging, Med. Phys., 48, 2960, 10.1002/mp.14855 · DOI
  8. Bhattacharya, 2022, Selective identification and localization of indolent and aggressive prostate cancers via CorrSigNIA: an MRI-pathology correlation and deep learning framework, Med. Image Anal., 75, 10.1016/j.media.2021.102288 · DOI
  9. Bhattacharya, 2022, A review of artificial intelligence in prostate cancer detection on imaging, Ther. Adv. Urol., 14, 10.1177/17562872221128791 · DOI
  10. Bhattacharya, 2022, Bridging the gap between prostate radiology and pathology through machine learning, Med. Phys., 49, 5160, 10.1002/mp.15777 · DOI
  11. Rusu, 2020, Registration of presurgical MRI and histopathology images from radical prostatectomy via RAPSODI, Med. Phys., 47, 4177, 10.1002/mp.14337 · DOI
  12. Ward, 2012, Prostate: registration of digital histopathologic images to in vivo MR images acquired by using endorectal receive coil, Radiology, 263, 10.1148/radiol.12102294 · DOI
  13. Sumathipala, 2018, Prostate cancer detection from multi-institution multiparametric MRIs using deep convolutional neural networks, J. Med. Imag., 5, 10.1117/1.JMI.5.4.044507 · DOI
  14. Chappelow, 2011, Elastic registration of multimodal prostate MRI and histology via multiattribute combined mutual information, Med. Phys., 38, 2005, 10.1118/1.3560879 · DOI
  15. Shao, 2021, ProsRegNet: a deep learning framework for registration of MRI and histopathology images of the prostate, Med. Image Anal., 68, 10.1016/j.media.2020.101919 · DOI
  16. Li, 2017, Co-Registration of ex vivo Surgical Histopathology and in vivo T2 weighted MRI of the Prostate via multi-scale spectral embedding representation, Sci. Rep., 7, 8717, 10.1038/s41598-017-08969-w · DOI
  17. Wu, 2019, A system using patient-specific 3D-printed molds to spatially align in vivo MRI with ex vivo MRI and whole-mount histopathology for prostate cancer research, J. Magn. Resonance Imag., 49
  18. Zamboglou, 2021, The impact of the co-registration technique and analysis methodology in comparison studies between advanced imaging modalities and whole-mount-histology reference in primary prostate cancer, Sci. Rep., 11, 1, 10.1038/s41598-021-85028-5 · DOI
  19. Reynolds, 2015, Development of a registration framework to validate MRI with histology for prostate focal therapy, Med. Phys., 42, 7078, 10.1118/1.4935343 · DOI
  20. Losnegård, 2018, Intensity-based volumetric registration of magnetic resonance images and whole-mount sections of the prostate, Comput. Med. Imaging Graph., 63, 24, 10.1016/j.compmedimag.2017.12.002 · DOI
  21. Soerensen, 2021, Deep learning improves speed and accuracy of prostate gland segmentations on magnetic resonance imaging for targeted biopsy, J. Urol., 206, 604, 10.1097/JU.0000000000001783 · DOI
  22. Cimadamore, 2021, Added clinical value of whole-mount histopathology of radical prostatectomy specimens: a collaborative review, Eur. Urol. Oncol., 4, 558, 10.1016/j.euo.2020.08.003 · DOI
  23. P. Isola, J.-Y. Zhu, T. Zhou, A.A. Efros, Image-to-image translation with conditional adversarial networks, in: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2017, pp. 1125–1134. · DOI · Paper page
  24. K. Simonyan, A. Zisserman, Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognition, in: Proc. ICLR, 2015.
  25. M. Arar, Y. Ginger, D. Danon, A.H. Bermano, D. Cohen-Or, Unsupervised multi-modal image registration via geometry preserving image-to-image translation, in: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2020, pp. 13410–13419. · DOI
  26. H. Fu, M. Gong, C. Wang, K. Batmanghelich, K. Zhang, D. Tao, Geometry-consistent generative adversarial networks for one-sided unsupervised domain mapping, in: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2019, pp. 2427–2436. · DOI
  27. Turkbey, 2011, Multiparametric 3T prostate magnetic resonance imaging to detect cancer: Histopathological correlation using prostatectomy specimens processed in customized magnetic resonance imaging based molds, J. Urol., 186, 1818, 10.1016/j.juro.2011.07.013 · DOI
  28. Xiao, 2011, Determining histology-MRI slice correspondences for defining MRI-based disease signatures of prostate cancer, Comput. Med. Imaging Graph., 35, 568, 10.1016/j.compmedimag.2010.12.003 · DOI
  29. Sood, 2021, 3D Registration of pre-surgical prostate MRI and histopathology images via super-resolution volume reconstruction, Med. Image Anal., 69, 10.1016/j.media.2021.101957 · DOI
  30. Moroianu, 2022, Computational detection of extraprostatic extension of prostate cancer on multiparametric MRI using deep learning, Cancers, 14, 2821, 10.3390/cancers14122821 · DOI
  31. Loeb, 2011, Complications after prostate biopsy: data from SEER-Medicare, J. Urol., 186, 1830, 10.1016/j.juro.2011.06.057 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 14

Metadata

Authors
Shao, W., Vesal, S., Soerensen, S. J. C., Bhattacharya, I., Golestani, N., Yamashita, R., Kunder, C. A., Fan, R. E., Ghanouni, P., Brooks, J. D., Sonn, G. A., & Rusu, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Florida (US)
  • Stanford Medicine (US)
  • Stanford University (US)
Corresponding author
  • Shao, Wei
  • Rusu, Mirabela
Venue
Computers in Biology and Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-05
Volume
173
Pages
108318
ISSN
0010-4825 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4392948977
Cited by
13
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5
FWCI
1.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Computers in Biology and Medicine (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Cancer Institute
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in cancer detection
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
Keywords
prostate cancer, whole-mount histopathology, deep learning registration, prostate segmentation
MeSH terms
Deep Learning, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Prostate, Prostatic Neoplasms, Radiology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review