The DOI matches its Crossref record.
RAPHIA: A deep learning pipeline for the registration of MRI and whole-mount histopathology images of the prostate
Open accessAbstract
Image registration can map the ground truth extent of prostate cancer from histopathology images onto MRI, facilitating the development of machine learning methods for early prostate cancer detection. Here, we present RAdiology PatHology Image Alignment (RAPHIA), an end-to-end pipeline for efficient and accurate registration of MRI and histopathology images. RAPHIA automates several time-consuming manual steps in existing approaches including prostate segmentation, estimation of the rotation angle and horizontal flipping in histopathology images, and estimation of MRI-histopathology slice correspondences. By utilizing deep learning registration networks, RAPHIA substantially reduces computational time. Furthermore, RAPHIA obviates the need for a multimodal image similarity metric by transferring histopathology image representations to MRI image representations and vice versa. With the assistance of RAPHIA, novice users achieved expert-level performance, and their mean error in estimating histopathology rotation angle was reduced by 51% (12 degrees vs 8 degrees), their mean accuracy of estimating histopathology flipping was increased by 5% (95.3% vs 100%), and their mean error in estimating MRI-histopathology slice correspondences was reduced by 45% (1.12 slices vs 0.62 slices). When compared to a recent conventional registration approach and a deep learning registration approach, RAPHIA achieved better mapping of histopathology cancer labels, with an improved mean Dice coefficient of cancer regions outlined on MRI and the deformed histopathology (0.44 vs 0.48 vs 0.50), and a reduced mean per-case processing time (51 vs 11 vs 4.5 min). The improved performance by RAPHIA allows efficient processing of large datasets for the development of machine learning models for prostate cancer detection on MRI. Our code is publicly available at: https://github.com/pimed/RAPHIA.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“RAPHIA, an end-to-end algorithm based on a geometry-consistent generative adversarial network (GcGAN), offers a promising solution for the registration of MRI and histopathology images, enabling cross-scale analysis of medical and histopathology images [177].”
From Challenges in AI-driven Biomedical Multimodal Data Fusion and Analysis (2025) · cites this paper as [177]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 31
- Siegel, 2022, Cancer statistics, 2022, CA: a Cancer J. Clin.
- Barentsz, 2016, Synopsis of the PI-RADS v2 guidelines for multiparametric prostate magnetic resonance imaging and recommendations for use, Eur. Urol., 69, 41, 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.08.038 · DOI
- Ahmed, 2017, Diagnostic accuracy of multi-parametric MRI and TRUS biopsy in prostate cancer (PROMIS): a paired validating confirmatory study, Lancet, 389, 815, 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)32401-1 · DOI
- Cao, 2019, Joint prostate cancer detection and gleason score prediction in mp-MRI via FocalNet, IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging, 38, 2496, 10.1109/TMI.2019.2901928 · DOI
- McGarry, 2019, Gleason probability maps: a radiomics tool for mapping prostate cancer likelihood in MRI space, Tomography, 5, 127, 10.18383/j.tom.2018.00033 · DOI
- Saha, 2021, End-to-end prostate cancer detection in bpMRI via 3D CNNs: Effects of attention mechanisms, clinical priori and decoupled false positive reduction, Med. Image Anal., 73, 10.1016/j.media.2021.102155 · DOI
- Seetharaman, 2021, Automated detection of aggressive and indolent prostate cancer on magnetic resonance imaging, Med. Phys., 48, 2960, 10.1002/mp.14855 · DOI
- Bhattacharya, 2022, Selective identification and localization of indolent and aggressive prostate cancers via CorrSigNIA: an MRI-pathology correlation and deep learning framework, Med. Image Anal., 75, 10.1016/j.media.2021.102288 · DOI
- Bhattacharya, 2022, A review of artificial intelligence in prostate cancer detection on imaging, Ther. Adv. Urol., 14, 10.1177/17562872221128791 · DOI
- Bhattacharya, 2022, Bridging the gap between prostate radiology and pathology through machine learning, Med. Phys., 49, 5160, 10.1002/mp.15777 · DOI
- Rusu, 2020, Registration of presurgical MRI and histopathology images from radical prostatectomy via RAPSODI, Med. Phys., 47, 4177, 10.1002/mp.14337 · DOI
- Ward, 2012, Prostate: registration of digital histopathologic images to in vivo MR images acquired by using endorectal receive coil, Radiology, 263, 10.1148/radiol.12102294 · DOI
- Sumathipala, 2018, Prostate cancer detection from multi-institution multiparametric MRIs using deep convolutional neural networks, J. Med. Imag., 5, 10.1117/1.JMI.5.4.044507 · DOI
- Chappelow, 2011, Elastic registration of multimodal prostate MRI and histology via multiattribute combined mutual information, Med. Phys., 38, 2005, 10.1118/1.3560879 · DOI
- Shao, 2021, ProsRegNet: a deep learning framework for registration of MRI and histopathology images of the prostate, Med. Image Anal., 68, 10.1016/j.media.2020.101919 · DOI
- Li, 2017, Co-Registration of ex vivo Surgical Histopathology and in vivo T2 weighted MRI of the Prostate via multi-scale spectral embedding representation, Sci. Rep., 7, 8717, 10.1038/s41598-017-08969-w · DOI
- Wu, 2019, A system using patient-specific 3D-printed molds to spatially align in vivo MRI with ex vivo MRI and whole-mount histopathology for prostate cancer research, J. Magn. Resonance Imag., 49
- Zamboglou, 2021, The impact of the co-registration technique and analysis methodology in comparison studies between advanced imaging modalities and whole-mount-histology reference in primary prostate cancer, Sci. Rep., 11, 1, 10.1038/s41598-021-85028-5 · DOI
- Reynolds, 2015, Development of a registration framework to validate MRI with histology for prostate focal therapy, Med. Phys., 42, 7078, 10.1118/1.4935343 · DOI
- Losnegård, 2018, Intensity-based volumetric registration of magnetic resonance images and whole-mount sections of the prostate, Comput. Med. Imaging Graph., 63, 24, 10.1016/j.compmedimag.2017.12.002 · DOI
- Soerensen, 2021, Deep learning improves speed and accuracy of prostate gland segmentations on magnetic resonance imaging for targeted biopsy, J. Urol., 206, 604, 10.1097/JU.0000000000001783 · DOI
- Cimadamore, 2021, Added clinical value of whole-mount histopathology of radical prostatectomy specimens: a collaborative review, Eur. Urol. Oncol., 4, 558, 10.1016/j.euo.2020.08.003 · DOI
- P. Isola, J.-Y. Zhu, T. Zhou, A.A. Efros, Image-to-image translation with conditional adversarial networks, in: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2017, pp. 1125–1134. · DOI · Paper page
- K. Simonyan, A. Zisserman, Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognition, in: Proc. ICLR, 2015.
- M. Arar, Y. Ginger, D. Danon, A.H. Bermano, D. Cohen-Or, Unsupervised multi-modal image registration via geometry preserving image-to-image translation, in: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2020, pp. 13410–13419. · DOI
- H. Fu, M. Gong, C. Wang, K. Batmanghelich, K. Zhang, D. Tao, Geometry-consistent generative adversarial networks for one-sided unsupervised domain mapping, in: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2019, pp. 2427–2436. · DOI
- Turkbey, 2011, Multiparametric 3T prostate magnetic resonance imaging to detect cancer: Histopathological correlation using prostatectomy specimens processed in customized magnetic resonance imaging based molds, J. Urol., 186, 1818, 10.1016/j.juro.2011.07.013 · DOI
- Xiao, 2011, Determining histology-MRI slice correspondences for defining MRI-based disease signatures of prostate cancer, Comput. Med. Imaging Graph., 35, 568, 10.1016/j.compmedimag.2010.12.003 · DOI
- Sood, 2021, 3D Registration of pre-surgical prostate MRI and histopathology images via super-resolution volume reconstruction, Med. Image Anal., 69, 10.1016/j.media.2021.101957 · DOI
- Moroianu, 2022, Computational detection of extraprostatic extension of prostate cancer on multiparametric MRI using deep learning, Cancers, 14, 2821, 10.3390/cancers14122821 · DOI
- Loeb, 2011, Complications after prostate biopsy: data from SEER-Medicare, J. Urol., 186, 1830, 10.1016/j.juro.2011.06.057 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Challenges in AI-driven Biomedical Multimodal Data Fusion and Analysis
Liu, J., Cen, X., Yi, C., Wang, F.-A., Ding, J., Cheng, J., Wu, Q., Gai, B., Zhou, Y., He, R., et al. (2025) · Genomics, Proteomics & Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/gpbjnl/qzaf011 · Cited by 75
“RAPHIA, an end-to-end algorithm based on a geometry-consistent generative adversarial network (GcGAN), offers a promising solution for the registration of MRI and histopathology images, enabling cross-scale analysis of medical and histopathology images [177].”
Radiology and multi-scale data integration for precision oncology
Paverd, H., Zormpas-Petridis, K., Clayton, H., Burge, S., & Crispin-Ortuzar, M. (2024) · npj Precision Oncology · doi:10.1038/s41698-024-00656-0 · Cited by 41
“More recently, alternative approaches have been proposed that eliminate the need for moulds by letting a deep learning based co-registration model fi nd the optimal alignment between tissue sections and 3D scan slices 61 .”
Wess, M., Andersen, M. K., Midtbust, E., Guillem, J. C. C., Viset, T., Størkersen, Ø., Krossa, S., Rye, M. B., & Tessem, M. (2025) · GigaScience · doi:10.1093/gigascience/giaf035 · Cited by 29
Elhaminia, B., Alsalemi, A., Nasir, E. S., Jahanifar, M., Awan, R., Young, L. S., Rajpoot, N., Minhas, F., & Raza, S. E. A. (2025) · Journal of Pathology Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.jpi.2025.100512 · Cited by 8
“In their recent work [109], they aimed to develop a fully automated registration pipeline for MRI-histopathology registration.”
Framework for Deep Learning Based Multi-Modality Image Registration of Snapshot and Pathology Images
Schoop, R. A. L., de Roode, L. D., de Boer, L. D., & Dashtbozorg, B. (2024) · IEEE journal of biomedical and health informatics · doi:10.1109/jbhi.2024.3444908 · Cited by 12
“However similar work has been done in image registration of MRI images to pathology images [10], [20], [21].”
BackgroundMethod
Metadata
- Authors
- Shao, W., Vesal, S., Soerensen, S. J. C., Bhattacharya, I., Golestani, N., Yamashita, R., Kunder, C. A., Fan, R. E., Ghanouni, P., Brooks, J. D., Sonn, G. A., & Rusu, M.
- Affiliations
- University of Florida (US)
- Stanford Medicine (US)
- Stanford University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Shao, Wei
- Rusu, Mirabela
- ORCID
- Venue
- Computers in Biology and Medicine
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2024-05
- Volume
- 173
- Pages
- 108318
- ISSN
- 0010-4825 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC11077621
- OpenAlex
- W4392948977
- Cited by
- 13
- References
- 37
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5
- FWCI
- 1.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
- www.elsevier.com/legal/tdmrep-license (tdm)
- www.elsevier.com/open-access/userlicense/1.0/ (am, 326 d)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-017 (stm-asf)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-037 (stm-asf)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-012 (stm-asf)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-029 (stm-asf)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-004 (stm-asf)
- Locations
- Computers in Biology and Medicine (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Cancer Institute
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in cancer detection
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
- Keywords
- prostate cancer, whole-mount histopathology, deep learning registration, prostate segmentation
- MeSH terms
- Deep Learning, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Prostate, Prostatic Neoplasms, Radiology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review