Cited by 40Viral Infectious Diseases and Gene Expression in InsectsOptimal Experimental Design MethodsProtein purification and stability

Constrained global sensitivity analysis for bioprocess design space identification

Open access
Kotidis, Pavlos, Demis, Panagiotis, Goey, Cher H., Correa, Elisa, McIntosh, Calum, Trepekli, Stefania, Shah, Nilay, Klymenko, Oleksiy V. +1 more·2019·Computers & Chemical Engineering

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.compchemeng.2019.01.022

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Each filter was tuned on a single batch and evaluated on the 3 held-out batches, whose feeding strategies span the galactose and uridine design space.

    “Each filter was tuned on a single batch and evaluated on the 3 held-out batches, whose feeding strategies span the galactose and uridine design space [26].”
  • Each validation experiment applied a distinct galactose and uridine supplementation profile, selected to span a design space constrained by requirements on product titre and galactosylation quality.

    “Each experiment applied a distinct galactose and uridine supplementation profile, selected to span a design space constrained by requirements on product titre and galactosylation quality, as reported in [26].”
  • The validation feeds expose the structural limitation because they span a wide galactose design space.

    “the validation feeds expose it because they span a wide galactose design space [26]”
  • Extrapolation of kinetic models has been shown to be poorly predictive of cellular regulation events owing to their reliance on fixed parameter values and predefined kinetic structures.

    “While these kinetic models provide valuable mechanistic insight, extrapolation of these models has been shown to be poorly predictive of cellular regulation events [26], owing to their reliance on fixed parameter values and predefined kinetic structures.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kotidis, P., Demis, P., Goey, C. H., Correa, E., McIntosh, C., Trepekli, S., Shah, N., Klymenko, O. V., & Kontoravdi, C.
Affiliations
  • Imperial College London (GB)
  • University of Surrey (GB)
Corresponding author
Kontoravdi, Cleo
Venue
Computers & Chemical Engineering
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-06
Volume
125
Pages
558-568
ISSN
0098-1354 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2921269266
Cited by
40
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2
FWCI
1.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Computers & Chemical Engineering (publishedVersion)
  • Surrey Research Insight Open Access (The University of Surrey) (submittedVersion)
  • Spiral (Imperial College London) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (EP/K038648/1)
  • Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Viral Infectious Diseases and Gene Expression in Insects
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Optimal Experimental Design Methods
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein purification and stability
Keywords
CHO cell culture, antibody production, feeding strategies, antibody titers, bioprocess development

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review