Cited by 41Biosimilars and Bioanalytical MethodsGlycosylation and Glycoproteins ResearchProtein purification and stability

Batch-to-batch N-glycosylation study of infliximab, trastuzumab and bevacizumab, and stability study of bevacizumab

Open access
Planinc, Ana, Dejaegher, Bieke, Vander Heyden, Yvan, Viaene, Johan, Van Praet, Serge, Rappez, Florence, Van Antwerpen, Pierre, Delporte, Cédric·2017·European Journal of Hospital Pharmacy

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Infliximab, trastuzumab and bevacizumab are among the most frequently prescribed therapeutic proteins, and like most other therapeutic proteins, are glycosylated. As differences in glycosylation may significantly change the safety and efficacy of therapeutic glycoproteins, it is extremely important to control N-glycosylation consistency. In the first part of this study, the batch-to-batch consistency of the N-glycosylation of infliximab, trastuzumab and bevacizumab was analysed. In the second part, the consistency of the N-glycosylation of bevacizumab stored in polycarbonate syringes (for off-label drug use) for 3 months was examined. METHODS: N-glycans were (i) enzymatically released using peptide-N-glycosidase F, (ii) reduced, and (iii) analysed using hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography coupled with high-resolution mass spectrometry. Mass spectrometry data were interpreted using principal component analysis combined with two-way analysis of variance and Tukey post hoc tests. The biological activity of infliximab and trastuzumab was examined using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays. RESULTS: The results of both studies make important contributions to the field of hospital pharmacy. All batches of the studied therapeutic glycoproteins (infliximab, trastuzumab and bevacizumab) varied considerably (especially in galactosylation), while the N-glycosylation of bevacizumab remained unchanged during 3-month storage. CONCLUSIONS: Threshold values for batch-to-batch N-glycosylation variations should be established and batch-to-batch glycosylation consistency should be regularly tested. In our study, samples with significantly different N-glycosylation profiles showed no significant variations in biological activity, suggesting that the differences are probably not therapeutically significant.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/ejhpharm-2016-001022

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The non-templated biosynthesis of glycans produces heterogeneous glycomic profiles due to enzymatic competition for a common substrate, substrate availability and enzyme-substrate specificity.

    “the non-templated biosynthesis of glycans is a major hurdle that produces heterogeneous glycomic profiles as a result of enzymatic competition for a common substrate, substrate availability and enzyme-substrate specificity [6,7].”

    From Glycoengineering Chinese hamster ovary cells: a short history (2021) · cites this paper as [7]

    The Introduction (page not supplied) describes consistent N-glycosylation profiles as difficult to obtain. The discussion (section labeled “Some,” page not supplied) attributes differing glycosylation patterns in the studied therapeutic proteins to the involvement of hundreds of enzymes. It does not state that glycan biosynthesis is non-templated or identify competition for a common substrate, substrate availability, or enzyme–substrate specificity as the causes. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Planinc, A., Dejaegher, B., Vander Heyden, Y., Viaene, J., Van Praet, S., Rappez, F., Van Antwerpen, P., & Delporte, C.
Affiliations
  • Université Libre de Bruxelles (BE)
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint-Pierre (BE)
Corresponding author
Planinc, Ana
Venue
European Journal of Hospital Pharmacy
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2016-09-15
Volume
24
Issue
5
Pages
286-292
ISSN
  • 2047-9956 (ISSN-L)
  • 2047-9964
OpenAlex
W2520070907
Cited by
41
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1
FWCI
1.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Journal of Hospital Pharmacy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Dépôt institutionnel de l'Université libre de Bruxelles (Université Libre de Bruxelles) (submittedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
  • VUBIR (Vrije Universiteit Brussel) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Fonds De La Recherche Scientifique - FNRS (34553.08)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Biosimilars and Bioanalytical Methods
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein purification and stability
Keywords
N-glycosylation, infliximab, trastuzumab, bevacizumab, batch-to-batch variation, N-glycan profiling, galactosylation, drug stability, off-label drug use, therapeutic glycoproteins, biological activity, hospital pharmacy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review