Cited by 810Personal Information Management and User BehaviorImpact of Technology on AdolescentsCyberloafing and Workplace Behavior

No A 4 U: The relationship between multitasking and academic performance

Junco, Reynol, Cotten, Shelia R.·2012·Computers & Education

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.compedu.2011.12.023

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 43 · Cited by 810

Authors
Junco, R., & Cotten, S. R.
Affiliations
University of Alabama (US)
Venue
Computers & Education
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-09
Volume
59
Issue
2
Pages
505-514
ISSN
0360-1315 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1999870998
Cited by
810
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 43 · 2024: 55 · 2023: 46 · 2022: 63 · 2021: 64 · 2020: 114 · 2019: 90 · 2018: 58 · 2017: 60 · 2016: 44 · 2015: 73 · 2014: 37 · 2013: 29 · 2012: 8
FWCI
96.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Computers & Education (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Personal Information Management and User Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Cyberloafing and Workplace Behavior
Keywords
multitasking, academic performance, university students, grade point average, information and communication technologies, Facebook use, cognitive processes, deep learning, information management strategy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review