No A 4 U: The relationship between multitasking and academic performance
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Multitasking has been found to be negatively correlated with learning performance.
“However, multitasking has been found to be negatively correlated with learning performance (Bowman, Levine, Waite, & Gendron, 2010;Junco, 2012;Kirschner & Karpinski, 2010;Kraushaar & Novak, 2010;Rosen, Carrier, & Cheever, 2013) possibly due to the limited capacity of our cognitive resources (Rosen, Lim, Carrier, & Cheever, 2011;Wood et al., 2012;Wu & Peng, 2016).”
University students engaged in multitasking may mistakenly assume that they are performing media multitasking without sacrificing efficiency and effectiveness or as a strategy of information management.
“Nevertheless, university students engaged in multitasking may mistakenly assume that they are performing media multitasking without sacrificing efficiency and effectiveness (Kirschner & Karpinski, 2010) or as a strategy of information management (Junco & Cotten, 2012).”
Engagement in multitasking is negatively related with academic achievement.
“Consistent with previous studies, engagement in multitasking is negatively related with academic achievement (Gaudreau, Miranda, & Gareau, 2014;Junco & Cotten, 2012;Kirschner & Karpinski, 2010).”
Many university students use multitasking as a strategy for managing information.
“Many university students use multitasking as a strategy for managing information (Junco & Cotten, 2012)”
Students who spent more time on Facebook had lower GPAs than those who spent less time on the social networking site.
“Students who spent more time on Facebook had lower GPAs than those who spent less time on the social networking site (Junco and Cotten, 2012).”
From The impact of digital technology, social media, and artificial intelligence on cognitive functions: a review (2023) · cites this paper as Junco and Cotten, 2012
Facebook or texting while completing schoolwork may tax students' capacity for cognitive processing, inhibiting deeper learning.
“Junco and Cotten (2012) surmised that Facebook or texting while completing schoolwork may tax students ' capacity for cognitive processing, inhibiting deeper learning.”
From Efficient, helpful, or distracting? A literature review of media multitasking in relation to academic performance (2018) · cites this paper as Junco and Cotten (2012)
Higher levels of digital media use, particularly multitasking with multiple devices, have been associated with lower academic achievement.
“Higher levels of digital media use, particularly multitasking with multiple devices, have been associated with lower academic achievement (Junco and Cotten, 2012).”
From The impact of digital technology, social media, and artificial intelligence on cognitive functions: a review (2023) · cites this paper as Junco and Cotten, 2012
Higher cognitive overload led to a decrease in ability to make decisions.
“leading to a decrease in their ability to make decisions (Junco and Cotten, 2012).”
From The impact of digital technology, social media, and artificial intelligence on cognitive functions: a review (2023) · cites this paper as Junco and Cotten, 2012
Participants who spent more time on social networking sites showed a higher level of cognitive overload.
“In one study, participants who spent more time on social networking sites showed a higher level of cognitive overload, leading to a decrease in their ability to make decisions (Junco and Cotten, 2012).”
From The impact of digital technology, social media, and artificial intelligence on cognitive functions: a review (2023) · cites this paper as Junco and Cotten, 2012
Formation of a Facebook-oriented social group smoothens the development of students.
“Actually, formation of Facebook oriented social group has been observed to smoothen development of student [22].”
From Integrated Three Theories to Develop a Model of Factors Affecting Students' Academic Performance in Higher Education (2019) · cites this paper as [22]
Failure to maintain focused attention has become a major problem among university students.
“In fact, failure to maintain focused attention has become a major problem among university students.”
From University students' Motivated Attention and use of regulation strategies on social media (2015) · cites this paper as Junco & Cotten, 2012
In a survey of 1774 college students in America, 51%, 33%, and 21% of the participants reported texting, using Facebook, and emailing, respectively, when doing schoolwork.
“in a survey of 1774 college students in America, Junco and Cotten (2012) found that 51%, 33%, and 21% of the participants reported texting, using Facebook, and emailing, respectively, when doing schoolwork.”
From University students' Motivated Attention and use of regulation strategies on social media (2015) · cites this paper as Junco & Cotten, 2012
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 43 · Cited by 810
- Authors
- Junco, R., & Cotten, S. R.
- Affiliations
- University of Alabama (US)
- ORCID
- Cotten, Shelia R.
- Venue
- Computers & Education
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012-09
- Volume
- 59
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 505-514
- ISSN
- 0360-1315 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1999870998
- Cited by
- 810
- References
- 43
- Citations by year
- 2026: 24 · 2025: 43 · 2024: 55 · 2023: 46 · 2022: 63 · 2021: 64 · 2020: 114 · 2019: 90 · 2018: 58 · 2017: 60 · 2016: 44 · 2015: 73 · 2014: 37 · 2013: 29 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 96.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Computers & Education (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Personal Information Management and User Behavior
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
- Social Sciences › Demography › Cyberloafing and Workplace Behavior
- Keywords
- multitasking, academic performance, university students, grade point average, information and communication technologies, Facebook use, cognitive processes, deep learning, information management strategy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review