Antecedents and consequences of perceived knowledge update in the context of an erp simulation game: A multi-level perspective
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Intention to learn was measured using scales from Darban et al. (2016) and Davis, Bagozzi, & Warshaw (1989).
“The researchers in this study adopted scales from Darban et al. (2016) and Davis, Bagozzi, & Warshaw (1989) for behavioral intention to assess their intention to learn programming.”
From The effects of online peer-facilitated learning and distributed pair programming on students’ learning (2023) · cites this paper as Darban et al., 2016
Cites
Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability.
Shrout, P. E., & Fleiss, J. L. (1979) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.86.2.420 · Cited by 23,433 · see citing works
The Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion
Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986) · Communication and Persuasion · doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-4964-1_1 · Cited by 3,202 · see citing works
Ahuja, M. K., & Bennett, J. (2005) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/25148691 · Cited by 818 · cited 1× · see citing works
“According to Ahuja and Thatcher (Ahuja & Thatcher, 2005), an organizational environment that supports innovative behaviors is important because it serves as a facilitator for innovation with IT.”
BackgroundGroup Size, ICC Values, and Group-Level Correlations: A Simulation
Bliese, P. D. (1998) · Organizational Research Methods · doi:10.1177/109442819814001 · Cited by 636 · cited 5× · see citing works
“It is important to note that ICC(1) values are not affected by group size, but ICC(2) values are affected by ICC(1) values and by group size (Bliese, 1998).”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialMotivating Employees to Explore Collaboration Technology in Team Contexts1
Maruping, L. M., & Magni, M. (2015) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2015/39.1.01 · Cited by 126 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
How is the use of technology in education evaluated? A systematic review
Lai, J. W. M., & Bower, M. (2019) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2019.01.010 · Cited by 334 · see citing works
Tsai, C.-W., Lin, M. Y.-C., Cheng, Y.-P., Lee, L.-Y., Chyr, W.-L., Lin, C.-H., Lin, J.-W., & Tsai, M.-C. (2023) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104849 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
“Intention to learn refers to an individual’s motivation or willingness to obtain knowledge about a specified subject (Darban et al., 2016) and is a critical factor in theory of planned behavior (Alhamami & Khan, 2019).”
- Authors
- Darban, M., Kwak, D.-H. (., Deng, S. (., Srite, M., & Lee, S.
- Affiliations
- Kent State University (US)
- University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee (US)
- Seoul National University (KR)
- Corresponding author
- Lee, Saerom
- Venue
- Computers & Education
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016-12
- Volume
- 103
- Pages
- 87-98
- ISSN
- 0360-1315 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2526120244
- Cited by
- 31
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 6.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Computers & Education (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational Games and Gamification
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › ERP Systems Implementation and Impact
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information Systems Education and Curriculum Development
- Keywords
- enterprise resource planning, IT knowledge, individual effort, intention to learn, multi-level perspective, information technology training, simulation games
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
