Cited by 79Digital literacy in educationGender and Technology in EducationLiteracy, Media, and Education

The relationship between the age at first computer use and students' perceived competence and autonomy in ICT usage: A mediation analysis

Juhaňák, Libor, Zounek, Jiří, Záleská, Klára, Bárta, Ondřej, Vlčková, Kristýna·2019·Computers & Education

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103614

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Juhaňák, L., Zounek, J., Záleská, K., Bárta, O., & Vlčková, K.
Affiliations
Masaryk University (CZ)
Corresponding author
Juhaňák, Libor
Venue
Computers & Education
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-11
Volume
141
Pages
103614
ISSN
0360-1315 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2954740292
Cited by
79
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 1
FWCI
14.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Computers & Education (publishedVersion)
Funders
Grantová Agentura České Republiky
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Digital literacy in education
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Technology in Education
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Literacy, Media, and Education
Keywords
ICT competence, digital literacy, ICT use, adolescents, mediation model, OECD countries

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review