Cited by 194Education, Achievement, and GiftednessPersonality Traits and PsychologySchool Choice and Performance

Handbook of self-concept: Developmental, social and clinical considerations

Birtchnell, John·1996·Personality and Individual Differences

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0191-8869(96)88866-0

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Birtchnell, J.
Corresponding author
Birtchnell, John
Venue
Personality and Individual Differences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1996-12
Volume
21
Issue
6
Pages
1085
ISSN
0191-8869 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1966856809
Cited by
193
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 6
Type
book review
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Personality and Individual Differences (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Education › School Choice and Performance
Keywords
academic self-concept, contrast effects, assimilation effect, gifted students, normative stability, self-concept development, educational tracking, academic acceleration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review