Cited by 104Teaching and Learning ProgrammingEducational Games and GamificationGender and Technology in Education

Can playing a video game foster computational thinking skills?

Zhao, Weinan, Shute, Valerie J.·2019·Computers & Education

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103633

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhao, W., & Shute, V. J.
Affiliations
  • Olivet University (US)
  • Florida State University (US)
Corresponding author
Zhao, Weinan
Venue
Computers & Education
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-11
Volume
141
Pages
103633
ISSN
0360-1315 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2892780925
Cited by
104
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 1
FWCI
12.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Computers & Education (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Teaching and Learning Programming
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational Games and Gamification
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Technology in Education
Keywords
computational thinking, video games, game-based learning, junior high school students, programming education

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review