The DOI matches its Crossref record; 92 of the 96 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Understanding higher education learners' acceptance and use of mobile devices for language learning: A Rasch-based path modeling approach
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The explained variances were higher than in a study conducted by Maican et al. (2019) on communication and collaboration applications in academic environments, as well as in a study conducted by Hoi (2020) on how the mobile devices are accepted and used for language learning by students.”
From Students’ Acceptance of ChatGPT in Higher Education: An Extended Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (2024) · cites this paper as Hoi (2020)
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The theory of planned behavior
Ajzen, I. (1991) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-t · Cited by 90,587
Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology
Davis, F. D. (1989) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249008 · Cited by 68,483
User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward A Unified View1
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/30036540 · Cited by 45,035
Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling
Tabri, N., & Elliott, C. M. (2012) · Canadian Graduate Journal of Sociology and Criminology · doi:10.15353/cgjsc.v1i1.3787 · Cited by 39,094
Rogers, E. M., Singhal, A., & Quinlan, M. M. (2019) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203710753-35 · Cited by 37,670
(1998) · Cited by 36,049
Herne, H., Cooley, W. W., & Lohnes, P. R. (1973) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A (General) · doi:10.2307/2344428 · Cited by 35,801
(1980) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 25,810
Understanding information technology usage: a test of competing models
Taylor, S., & Todd, P. A. (1995) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.6.2.144 · Cited by 8,815
Extrinsic and Intrinsic Motivation to Use Computers in the Workplace 1
Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1992) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1992.tb00945.x · Cited by 6,231
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- Chan, 2011, Students' perceptions of and attitudes towards podcast-based learning: A comparison of two language podcast projects, Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 8, 312
- Linacre, 2002, What do infit and outfit, mean-square and standardized mean?, Rasch Measurement Transactions, 16, 878
- Wagner, 2005, Disconnected: Why learning professionals need to care about mobile learning, American Society for Training and Development, 43, 40
- Wu, 2011, Ubiquitous English learning system with dynamic personalized guidance of learning portfolio, Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 14, 164
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Strzelecki, A. (2024) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2023.2209881 · Cited by 807
Strzelecki, A. (2024) · Innovative Higher Education · doi:10.1007/s10755-023-09686-1 · Cited by 477
“The explained variances were higher than in a study conducted by Maican et al. (2019) on communication and collaboration applications in academic environments, as well as in a study conducted by Hoi (2020) on how the mobile devices are accepted and used for language learning by students.”
Xue, L., Rashid, A. M., & Ouyang, S. (2024) · SAGE Open · doi:10.1177/21582440241229570 · Cited by 465
Νικολοπούλου, Κ., Gialamas, V., & Lavidas, K. (2021) · Computers and Education Open · doi:10.1016/j.caeo.2021.100041 · Cited by 355
Dwivedi, Y. K., Rana, N. P., Tamilmani, K., & Raman, R. (2020) · Current Opinion in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2020.03.008 · Cited by 337
Metadata
- Authors
- Hoi, V. N.
- Venue
- Computers & Education
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-03
- Volume
- 146
- Pages
- 103761
- ISSN
- 0360-1315 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2989694933
- Cited by
- 250
- References
- 96
- Citations by year
- 2026: 18 · 2025: 37 · 2024: 50 · 2023: 37 · 2022: 48 · 2021: 40 · 2020: 19
- FWCI
- 33.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- Locations
- Computers & Education (publishedVersion)
- Cross Connect (Southern Cross University) (submittedVersion)
- QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Mobile Learning in Education
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
- Social Sciences › Education › English Language Learning and Teaching
- Keywords
- mobile-assisted language learning, technology acceptance, UTAUT, higher education learners, language learning, attitudes, performance expectancy, behavioral intention, facilitating conditions, mobile devices, developing countries, Vietnam
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
