The DOI matches its Crossref record; 79 of the 79 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Teaching and learning with children: Impact of reciprocal peer learning with a social robot on children’s learning and emotive engagement
Open accessAbstract
Abstract Pedagogical agents are typically designed to take on a single role: either as a tutor who guides and instructs the student, or as a tutee that learns from the student to reinforce what he/she knows. While both agent-role paradigms have been shown to promote student learning, we hypothesize that there will be heightened benefit with respect to students’ learning and emotional engagement if the agent engages children in a more peer-like way — adaptively switching between tutor/tutee roles. In this work, we present a novel active role-switching (ARS) policy trained using reinforcement learning, in which the agent is rewarded for adapting its tutor or tutee behavior to the child’s knowledge mastery level. To investigate how the three different child–agent interaction paradigms (tutee, tutor, and peer agents) impact children’s learning and affective engagement, we designed a randomized controlled between-subject experiment. Fifty-nine children aged 5–7 years old from a local public school participated in a collaborative word-learning activity with one of the three agent-role paradigms. Our analysis revealed that children’s vocabulary acquisition benefited from the robot tutor’s instruction and knowledge demonstration, whereas children exhibited slightly greater affect on their faces when the robot behaves as a tutee of the child. This synergistic effect between tutor and tutee roles suggests why our adaptive peer-like agent brought the most benefit to children’s vocabulary learning and affective engagement, as compared to an agent that interacts only as a tutor or tutee for the child. This work sheds light on how fixed role (tutor/tutee) and adaptive role (peer) agents support children’s cognitive and emotional needs as they play and learn. It also contributes to an important new dimension of designing educational agents — actively adapting roles based on the student’s engagement and learning needs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Introduction to Reinforcement Learning
Sutton, R. S., & Barto, A. G. (1998) · The MIT Press eBooks · Cited by 6,855
Meaningful Differences in the Everyday Experience of Young American Children
Panagos, R. J. (1998) · Remedial and Special Education · doi:10.1177/074193259801900609 · Cited by 4,173
Peer Interactions, Relationships, and Groups
Rubin, K. H., Bukowski, W. M., & Parker, J. G. (2007) · Handbook of Child Psychology · doi:10.1002/9780470147658.chpsy0310 · Cited by 2,755
The 2 Sigma Problem: The Search for Methods of Group Instruction as Effective as One-to-One Tutoring
BLOOM, B. S. (1984) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x013006004 · Cited by 2,734
Social learning and personality development
Bandura, A., & Walters, R. H. (1963) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 2,333
Social Learning and Personality Development
Rotter, J. B., Bandura, A., & Walters, R. H. (1964) · The American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.2307/1421043 · Cited by 1,826
Social robots for education: a review.
Belpaeme, T., Kennedy, J., Ramachandran, A., Scassellati, B., & Tanaka, F. (2018) · Science Robotics · doi:10.1126/scirobotics.aat5954 · Cited by 1,558
Topping, K. J. (2005) · Educational Psychology · doi:10.1080/01443410500345172 · Cited by 1,503
Emotion in the Human Face: Guidelines for Research and an Integration of Findings
Ekman, P., Friesen, W. V., & Ellsworth, P. C. (1972) · Cited by 1,279
Interactive Robots as Social Partners and Peer Tutors for Children: A Field Trial
Kanda, T., Hirano, T., Eaton, D., & Ishiguro, H. (2004) · Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1207/s15327051hci1901&2_4 · Cited by 1,003
Cited by
An analysis of children’ interaction with an AI chatbot and its impact on their interest in reading
Liu, C.-C., Liao, M.-G., Chang, C.-H., & Lin, H.-M. (2022) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104576 · Cited by 240
Yang, Q.-F., Lian, L.-W., & Zhao, J.-H. (2023) · International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education · doi:10.1186/s41239-023-00391-9 · Cited by 152
Harnessing AI for education 4.0: Drivers of personalized learning.
Barrera Castro, G. P., Chiappe, A., Becerra Rodriguez, D. F., & Sepulveda, F. G. (2024) · Electronic Journal of e-Learning · doi:10.34190/ejel.22.5.3467 · Cited by 132
Artificial intelligence-based robots in education: A systematic review of selected SSCI publications
Chu, S.-T., Hwang, G.-J., & Tu, Y.-F. (2022) · Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100091 · Cited by 88
Lee, H.-Y., Wu, T.-T., Lin, C.-J., Wang, W.-S., & Huang, Y.-M. (2024) · Journal of Educational Computing Research · doi:10.1177/07356331231211916 · Cited by 52
Metadata
- Authors
- Chen, H., Park, H. W., & Breazeal, C.
- Venue
- Computers & Education
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-06
- Volume
- 150
- Pages
- 103836
- ISSN
- 0360-1315 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3004720641
- Cited by
- 258
- References
- 79
- FWCI
- 32.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Teaching and learning with children: Impact of reciprocal peer learning with a social robot on children’s learning and emotive engagement. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103836
- The paper
- Chen, H., Park, H. W., & Breazeal, C. (2020). Teaching and learning with children: Impact of reciprocal peer learning with a social robot on children’s learning and emotive engagement. Computers & Education. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103836
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.