Cited by 29Caching and Content DeliveryPeer-to-Peer Network TechnologiesNetwork Traffic and Congestion Control

Video delivery networks: Challenges, solutions and future directions

Open access
Fan, Qilin, Yin, Hao, Min, Geyong, Yang, Po, Luo, Yan, Lyu, Yongqiang, Huang, Haojun, Jiao, Libo·2018·Computers & Electrical Engineering

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.compeleceng.2017.04.011

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The proposed scheme is suitable for both H.264/AVC and HEVC video codec standards.

    “As mentioned in Section 1, the scheme is suitable for both current video codec standards, the H.264/AVC standard [20] and the HEVC codec [21]”

    From Effectiveness of crypto-transcoding for H.264/AVC and HEVC video bit-streams (2019) · cites this paper as [20]

    The Introduction and Section 3.2 discuss video streaming and bitrate adaptation, but do not address whether a proposed scheme works with H.264/AVC or HEVC. Searches of our copy for H.264, HEVC, and codec compatibility found no passage supporting the claim. (LLM, conf=0.77)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 32 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Cisco. Cisco global cloud index: Forecast and methodology, 2015-2020. CISCO White paper, pages 1-28, 2016.
  2. S. Akhshabi, L. Anantakrishnan, A. Begen, and C. Dovrolis. What happens when http adaptive streaming players compete for bandwidth? In Proc. of NOSSDAV, pages 9-14, 2012.
  3. Harsha V Madhyastha, Ethan Katz-Bassett, Thomas E Anderson, Arvind Krishnamurthy, and Arun Venkataramani. iplane nano: Path prediction for peer-to-peer applications. In NSDI, volume 9, pages 137-152, 2009.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fan, Q., Yin, H., Min, G., Yang, P., Luo, Y., Lyu, Y., Huang, H., & Jiao, L.
Affiliations
  • Tsinghua University (CN)
  • University of Exeter (GB)
  • Liverpool John Moores University (GB)
  • University of Massachusetts Lowell (US)
  • Wuhan University (CN)
Corresponding author
Fan, Qilin
Venue
Computers & Electrical Engineering
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-02
Volume
66
Pages
332-341
ISSN
0045-7906 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2613430740
Cited by
29
References
32
Citations by year
2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1
FWCI
3.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Computers & Electrical Engineering (publishedVersion)
  • White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (acceptedVersion)
  • Liverpool John Moores University (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (61672318, 61631013, 61402343)
  • Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu (BK20160385)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Caching and Content Delivery
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Peer-to-Peer Network Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Network Traffic and Congestion Control
Keywords
content delivery networks, video scalability, quality of service, video generation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review