Cited by 112Transportation and Mobility InnovationsTransportation Planning and OptimizationTraffic Prediction and Management Techniques

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Analyzing the dynamic ride-sharing potential for shared autonomous vehicle fleets using cellphone data from Orlando, Florida

Gurumurthy, Krishna Murthy, Kockelman, Kara M.·2018·Computers, Environment and Urban Systems

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2018.05.008

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Shared mobility services can make the deployment of autonomous vehicles financially viable.

    “shared mobility services can make the deployment of autonomous vehicles financially viable (Gurumurthy & Kockelman, 2018;Stocker & Shaheen, 2018).”

    From Shared autonomous vehicle services: A comprehensive review (2020) · cites this paper as Gurumurthy & Kockelman, 2018

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 17

  1. Agatz, 2011, Dynamic ride-sharing: A simulation study in metro Atlanta, Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 17, 532, 10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.04.530 · DOI
  2. Alexander, 2015, Origin-destination trips by purpose and time of day inferred from mobile phone data, Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 58, 240, 10.1016/j.trc.2015.02.018 · DOI
  3. Alonso-Mora, 2016, On-demand high-capacity ride-sharing via dynamic trip-vehicle assignment, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 114, 462, 10.1073/pnas.1611675114 · DOI
  4. Amey, 2014, Real-time ridesharing: Opportunities and challenges in using mobile phone technology to improve rideshare services, Transportation Research Record, 2217, 103, 10.3141/2217-13 · DOI
  5. Bansal, 2017, Forecasting Americans' long-term adoption of connected and autonomous vehicle technologies, Transportation Research Part A, 95, 49
  6. Berbeglia, 2010, Dynamic pickup and delivery problems, European Journal of Operational Research, 202, 8, 10.1016/j.ejor.2009.04.024 · DOI
  7. Brownell, 2014, A driverless alternative: Fleet size and cost requirements for a statewide autonomous taxi network in New Jersey, Transportation Research Record, 2416, 73, 10.3141/2416-09 · DOI
  8. Calabrese, 2011, Estimating origin-destination flows using opportunistically collected mobile phone location data from one million users in Boston metropolitan area, IEEE Pervasive Computing, 10, 36, 10.1109/MPRV.2011.41 · DOI
  9. Chan, 2012, Ridesharing in North America: Past, present, and future, Transport Reviews, 32, 93, 10.1080/01441647.2011.621557 · DOI
  10. Fagnant, 2016, Dynamic ride-sharing and fleet sizing for a system of shared autonomous vehicles, Transportation, 45, 1
  11. Hörl, 2017, Agent-based simulation of autonomous taxi services with dynamic demand responses, Procedia Computer Science, 109C, 899, 10.1016/j.procs.2017.05.418 · DOI
  12. Loeb, 2017, Fleet performance & cost evaluation of a Shared Autonomous Electric Vehicle (SAEV) Fleet: A case study for Austin, Texas, Transportation Research Part A – Policy and Practice
  13. Loeb, 2018, Shared autonomous electric vehicle (SAEV) operations across the Austin, Texas network with a focus on charging infrastructure decisions, Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 89, 222, 10.1016/j.trc.2018.01.019 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Levin, 2017, A general framework for modeling shared autonomous vehicles with dynamic network-loading and dynamic ride-sharing application, Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 64, 373, 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2017.04.006 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Santi, 2014, Quantifying the benefits of vehicle pooling with shareability networks, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111, 13290, 10.1073/pnas.1403657111 · DOI
  16. Spieser, 2014, Toward a systematic approach to the design and evaluation of automated mobility-on-demand systems: A case study in Singapore, Road Vehicle Automation, 229, 10.1007/978-3-319-05990-7_20 · DOI
  17. Tao, 2007, Dynamic taxi-sharing service using intelligent transportation system technologies, Wireless Communications, Networking and Mobile Computing, 3209

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Gurumurthy, K. M., & Kockelman, K. M.
Affiliations
The University of Texas at Austin (US)
Corresponding author
Kockelman, Kara M.
Venue
Computers, Environment and Urban Systems
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-09
Volume
71
Pages
177-185
ISSN
0198-9715 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2811391846
Cited by
112
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 2
FWCI
7.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Computers Environment and Urban Systems (publishedVersion)
Funders
TxDOT (0-6838)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Transportation › Transportation and Mobility Innovations
  • Social Sciences › Transportation › Transportation Planning and Optimization
  • Social Sciences › Transportation › Traffic Prediction and Management Techniques
Keywords
dynamic ridesharing, shared autonomous vehicles, fleet size optimization, ride-hailing, travel time, parking demand reduction, Orlando

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review