The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Enabling condition-based maintenance decisions with proactive event-driven computing
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Markov Decision Processes (MDP), which have been used for proactive decision making by representing the decision making process instead of the physical process itself (Bousdekis, Papageorgiou, Magoutas, Apostolou, & Mentzas, 2018), can be utilized in prescriptive analytics for handling uncertainty.”
From Prescriptive analytics: Literature review and research challenges (2020) · cites this paper as Bousdekis, Papageorgiou, Magoutas, Apostolou, & Mentzas, 2018
Citations
Cites
Ratings and Rankings: Voodoo or Science?
Paruolo, P., Saisana, M., & Saltelli, A. (2013) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A: Statistics in Society · doi:10.1111/j.1467-985x.2012.01059.x · Cited by 349
A basic model for proactive event-driven computing
Engel, Y., Etzion, O., & Feldman, Z. (2012) · Proceedings of the 6th ACM International Conference on Distributed Event-Based Systems · doi:10.1145/2335484.2335496 · Cited by 67
Research works printed but not linked: 23
- Karim, 2009, E-maintenance and information logistics: aspects of content format, J. Qual. Maint. Eng., 15, 308, 10.1108/13552510910983242 · DOI
- Guillén, 2016, A framework for effective management of condition based maintenance programs in the context of industrial development of E-Maintenance strategies, Comput. Ind., 82, 170, 10.1016/j.compind.2016.07.003 · DOI
- Vogl, 2016, A review of diagnostic and prognostic capabilities and best practices for manufacturing, J. Intell. Manuf., 1
- Elwany, 2008, Sensor-driven prognostic models for equipment replacement and spare parts inventory, IIE Trans., 40, 629, 10.1080/07408170701730818 · DOI
- Feldman, 2013, Proactive event processing in action: a case study on the proactive management of transport processes, Proceedings of the Seventh ACM International Conference on Distributed Event-Based Systems (DEBS’13), 97, 10.1145/2488222.2488274 · DOI
- Bousdekis, 2015, A proactive decision making framework for condition-based maintenance, Ind. Manage. Data Syst., 115, 1225, 10.1108/IMDS-03-2015-0071 · DOI
- Ahmad, 2012, An overview of time-based and condition-based maintenance in industrial application, Comput. Ind. Eng., 63, 135, 10.1016/j.cie.2012.02.002 · DOI
- Desforges, 2017, A prognostic function for complex systems to support production and maintenance co-operative planning based on an extension of object oriented Bayesian networks, Comput. Ind., 86, 34, 10.1016/j.compind.2017.01.002 · DOI
- Dong, 2017, Application of internet of things technology on predictive maintenance system of coal equipment, Proc. Eng., 174, 885, 10.1016/j.proeng.2017.01.237 · DOI
- Lin, 2017, Development of advanced manufacturing cloud of things (AMCoT)—a smart manufacturing platform, IEEE Robot. Autom. Lett., 2, 1809, 10.1109/LRA.2017.2706859 · DOI
- Civerchia, 2017, Industrial internet of things monitoring solution for advanced predictive maintenance applications, J. Ind. Inf. Integr., 7, 4
- Yan, 2017, Industrial big data in an industry 4.0 environment: challenges, schemes: and applications for predictive maintenance, IEEE Access, 5, 23484, 10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2765544 · DOI
- Li, 2017, Intelligent predictive maintenance for fault diagnosis and prognosis in machine centers: industry 4.0 scenario, Adv. Manuf., 5, 377, 10.1007/s40436-017-0203-8 · DOI
- Campos, 2009, Development in the application of ICT in condition monitoring and maintenance, Comput. Ind., 60, 1, 10.1016/j.compind.2008.09.007 · DOI
- Van Horenbeek, 2013, Joint maintenance and inventory optimization systems: a review, Int. J. Prod. Econ., 143, 499, 10.1016/j.ijpe.2012.04.001 · DOI
- Aboelmaged, 2015, E-maintenance research: a multifaceted perspective, J. Manuf. Technol. Manage., 26, 606, 10.1108/JMTM-02-2013-0009 · DOI
- Bousdekis, 2015, Review, analysis and synthesis of prognostic-based decision support methods for condition based maintenance, J. Intell. Manuf., 1
- Wu, 2007, A neural network integrated decision support system for condition-based optimal predictive maintenance policy, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cyber.-Part A: Syst. Hum., 37, 226, 10.1109/TSMCA.2006.886368 · DOI
- Gegenfurtner, 1992, PRAXIS: Brent’s algorithm for function minimization, Behav. Res. Methods Instrum. Comput., 24, 560, 10.3758/BF03203605 · DOI
- Vanneste, 1995, An integrated and structured approach to improve maintenance, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 82, 241, 10.1016/0377-2217(94)00261-A · DOI
- El Kadiri, 2016, Current trends on ICT technologies for enterprise information systems, Comput. Ind., 79, 14, 10.1016/j.compind.2015.06.008 · DOI
- Wang, 2015, A prognostics-based spare part ordering and system replacement policy for a deteriorating system subjected to a random lead time, Int. J. Prod. Res., 53, 4511, 10.1080/00207543.2014.988892 · DOI
- Hamby, 1994, A review of techniques for parameter sensitivity analysis of environmental models, Environ. Monit. Assess., 32, 135, 10.1007/BF00547132 · DOI
Cited by
Prescriptive analytics: Literature review and research challenges
Lepenioti, K., Bousdekis, A., Apostolou, D., & Mentzas, G. (2020) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.04.003 · Cited by 501
“…making problems in different contexts are: Artificial Neural Networks (Domingos, Burguillo, & Lenaerts, 2017), Bayesian Networks (Said, Shahzad, Zamai, Hubac, & Tollenaere, 2016), topic models (Roberts et al., 2014), fuzzy sets (Pal & Ceglarek, 2013), Markov models (Bousdekis et al., 2018).”
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Bousdekis, A., Papageorgiou, N., Magoutas, B., Apostolou, D., & Mentzas, G.
- Affiliations
- National Technical University of Athens (GR)
- University of Piraeus (GR)
- Corresponding author
- Bousdekis, Alexandros
- Venue
- Computers in Industry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-09
- Volume
- 100
- Pages
- 173-183
- ISSN
- 0166-3615 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2802725548
- Cited by
- 49
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 6.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Computers in Industry (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- European Commission
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality › Reliability and Maintenance Optimization
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Digital Transformation in Industry
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Machine Fault Diagnosis Techniques
- Keywords
- condition-based maintenance, maintenance decision-making, Internet of Things, proactive maintenance, oil and gas industry
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.