Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 49Reliability and Maintenance OptimizationDigital Transformation in IndustryMachine Fault Diagnosis Techniques

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Enabling condition-based maintenance decisions with proactive event-driven computing

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.compind.2018.04.019

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 23

  1. Karim, 2009, E-maintenance and information logistics: aspects of content format, J. Qual. Maint. Eng., 15, 308, 10.1108/13552510910983242 · DOI
  2. Guillén, 2016, A framework for effective management of condition based maintenance programs in the context of industrial development of E-Maintenance strategies, Comput. Ind., 82, 170, 10.1016/j.compind.2016.07.003 · DOI
  3. Vogl, 2016, A review of diagnostic and prognostic capabilities and best practices for manufacturing, J. Intell. Manuf., 1
  4. Elwany, 2008, Sensor-driven prognostic models for equipment replacement and spare parts inventory, IIE Trans., 40, 629, 10.1080/07408170701730818 · DOI
  5. Feldman, 2013, Proactive event processing in action: a case study on the proactive management of transport processes, Proceedings of the Seventh ACM International Conference on Distributed Event-Based Systems (DEBS’13), 97, 10.1145/2488222.2488274 · DOI
  6. Bousdekis, 2015, A proactive decision making framework for condition-based maintenance, Ind. Manage. Data Syst., 115, 1225, 10.1108/IMDS-03-2015-0071 · DOI
  7. Ahmad, 2012, An overview of time-based and condition-based maintenance in industrial application, Comput. Ind. Eng., 63, 135, 10.1016/j.cie.2012.02.002 · DOI
  8. Desforges, 2017, A prognostic function for complex systems to support production and maintenance co-operative planning based on an extension of object oriented Bayesian networks, Comput. Ind., 86, 34, 10.1016/j.compind.2017.01.002 · DOI
  9. Dong, 2017, Application of internet of things technology on predictive maintenance system of coal equipment, Proc. Eng., 174, 885, 10.1016/j.proeng.2017.01.237 · DOI
  10. Lin, 2017, Development of advanced manufacturing cloud of things (AMCoT)—a smart manufacturing platform, IEEE Robot. Autom. Lett., 2, 1809, 10.1109/LRA.2017.2706859 · DOI
  11. Civerchia, 2017, Industrial internet of things monitoring solution for advanced predictive maintenance applications, J. Ind. Inf. Integr., 7, 4
  12. Yan, 2017, Industrial big data in an industry 4.0 environment: challenges, schemes: and applications for predictive maintenance, IEEE Access, 5, 23484, 10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2765544 · DOI
  13. Li, 2017, Intelligent predictive maintenance for fault diagnosis and prognosis in machine centers: industry 4.0 scenario, Adv. Manuf., 5, 377, 10.1007/s40436-017-0203-8 · DOI
  14. Campos, 2009, Development in the application of ICT in condition monitoring and maintenance, Comput. Ind., 60, 1, 10.1016/j.compind.2008.09.007 · DOI
  15. Van Horenbeek, 2013, Joint maintenance and inventory optimization systems: a review, Int. J. Prod. Econ., 143, 499, 10.1016/j.ijpe.2012.04.001 · DOI
  16. Aboelmaged, 2015, E-maintenance research: a multifaceted perspective, J. Manuf. Technol. Manage., 26, 606, 10.1108/JMTM-02-2013-0009 · DOI
  17. Bousdekis, 2015, Review, analysis and synthesis of prognostic-based decision support methods for condition based maintenance, J. Intell. Manuf., 1
  18. Wu, 2007, A neural network integrated decision support system for condition-based optimal predictive maintenance policy, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cyber.-Part A: Syst. Hum., 37, 226, 10.1109/TSMCA.2006.886368 · DOI
  19. Gegenfurtner, 1992, PRAXIS: Brent’s algorithm for function minimization, Behav. Res. Methods Instrum. Comput., 24, 560, 10.3758/BF03203605 · DOI
  20. Vanneste, 1995, An integrated and structured approach to improve maintenance, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 82, 241, 10.1016/0377-2217(94)00261-A · DOI
  21. El Kadiri, 2016, Current trends on ICT technologies for enterprise information systems, Comput. Ind., 79, 14, 10.1016/j.compind.2015.06.008 · DOI
  22. Wang, 2015, A prognostics-based spare part ordering and system replacement policy for a deteriorating system subjected to a random lead time, Int. J. Prod. Res., 53, 4511, 10.1080/00207543.2014.988892 · DOI
  23. Hamby, 1994, A review of techniques for parameter sensitivity analysis of environmental models, Environ. Monit. Assess., 32, 135, 10.1007/BF00547132 · DOI

Cited by

  • Prescriptive analytics: Literature review and research challenges

    Lepenioti, K., Bousdekis, A., Apostolou, D., & Mentzas, G. (2020) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.04.003 · Cited by 501

    “…making problems in different contexts are: Artificial Neural Networks (Domingos, Burguillo, & Lenaerts, 2017), Bayesian Networks (Said, Shahzad, Zamai, Hubac, & Tollenaere, 2016), topic models (Roberts et al., 2014), fuzzy sets (Pal & Ceglarek, 2013), Markov models (Bousdekis et al., 2018).”
    Self-citation

Metadata

Authors
Bousdekis, A., Papageorgiou, N., Magoutas, B., Apostolou, D., & Mentzas, G.
Affiliations
  • National Technical University of Athens (GR)
  • University of Piraeus (GR)
Corresponding author
Bousdekis, Alexandros
Venue
Computers in Industry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-09
Volume
100
Pages
173-183
ISSN
0166-3615 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2802725548
Cited by
49
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 1
FWCI
6.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Computers in Industry (publishedVersion)
Funders
European Commission
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality › Reliability and Maintenance Optimization
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Digital Transformation in Industry
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Machine Fault Diagnosis Techniques
Keywords
condition-based maintenance, maintenance decision-making, Internet of Things, proactive maintenance, oil and gas industry

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.