Cited by 92Business Process Modeling and AnalysisDigital Transformation in IndustryModel-Driven Software Engineering Techniques

Enterprise modelling: Research review and outlook

Open access
Vernadat, François·2020·Computers in Industry

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.compind.2020.103265

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Enterprise models are important artifacts for capturing insights into the core components and structures of an organization, including business processes, resources, information flows, and IT systems.

    “Enterprise models are important artifacts for capturing insights into the core components and structures of an organization, including business processes, resources, information flows, and IT systems (Vernadat 2020).”

    From Generative AI (2024) · cites this paper as Vernadat 2020

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 183 · Cited by 92

Research works printed but not linked: 17

  1. K. Sankuhl, J. Stirna, A. Persson, M. Wißotzki, Enterprise Modeling: Tackling Business Challenges with the 4EM Method, Springer, Heidelberg, 2014.
  2. ESPRIT Consortium AMICE (Eds.), Open System Architecture for CIM, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1989.
  3. ESPRIT Consortium AMICE (Eds.), CIMOSA: Open System Architecture for CIM, 2nd, revised and extended version, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1993.
  4. A. Blyth (Ed.), Special issue: enterprise modelling: case studies and business process re-engineering, ACM SIGGROUP Bulletin 18 (1) (1997) 49-75.
  5. F. Vernadat (Ed.), Special issue on Enterprise Modelling Part I, Prod. Plan. Control 12 (2) (2001) Whole issue.
  6. K. Kosanke, F. Vernadat, M. Zelm (Eds.) Special Issue: CIMOSA: CIM Open Systems Architecture Evolution and Applications in Enterprise Engineering and Integration, Comput. Ind. 40 (2-3) (1999) Whole issue.
  7. T. Gransier, W. Schönewolf (Eds.) Special issue: Validation of CIMOSA, Comput. Ind. 27 (2) (1995) Whole issue.
  8. K. Kosanke, J.G. Nell (Eds.), Enterprise Engineering and Integration: Building International Consensus. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1997.
  9. M.S. Fox, The TOVE Project: A common-sense model of the enterprise, in: C. J. Petrie (Ed.), Enterprise Integration Modeling -Proceedings of the First International Conference, The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1992.
  10. F. Fadel, M.S. Fox, M. Gruninger, A resource ontology for enterprise modelling, Third Workshop on Enabling Technologies-Infrastructures for Collaborative Enterprises, West Virginia University, 1994, pp. 117-128.
  11. D. Tham, M.S. Fox, M. Gruninger, Third Workshop on Enabling Technologies-Infrastructures for Collaborative Enterprises, West Virginia University, 1994, 197-210.
  12. M. Ould, Business Processes: Modeling and Analysis for Re-engineering and Improvement, John Wiley & Sons, New-York, 1995.
  13. G. Booch, J. Rumbaugh, I. Jacobson, The Unified Modeling Language User Guide, Addison- Wesley, Readings, MA, 1999.
  14. H.T. Goranson, M.N. Huhns, J.G. Nell, H. Panetto, G. Tormo Carbo, M. Wuram, A merged future for knowledge management and enterprise modelling, in: K. Kosanke et al. (Eds.) Enterprise Inter-and Intra-Organizational Integration: Building International Consensus, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, MA, 2003, 37-50.
  15. M. Harzallah, F. Vernadat, Validation of modelling constructs for the organisational aspects in CIMOSA. Proc. of IFAC/IEEE/INRIA Int. Conf. on Manufacturing Control and Production Logistics (MCPL'2000), Grenoble, France, 4-7 July 2000.
  16. J. Stirna, J. Grabis, M. Henkel, J. Zdravkovic, Capability driven development -a approach to support evolving organisations, LNBIP 134, Springer, Berlin, 2012, pp. 117-131.
  17. Johannesson, E. Söderström (Eds.) Information Systems Engineering: From Data Analysis to Process Networks, Idea Group Inc., Hershey, PA, 2008, pp. 129-158.

Authors
Vernadat, F.
Affiliations
Laboratoire de Génie Informatique, de Production et de Maintenance (FR)
Corresponding author
Vernadat, François
Venue
Computers in Industry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-11
Volume
122
Pages
103265
ISSN
0166-3615 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3040052821
Cited by
92
References
183
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 2
FWCI
12.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Computers in Industry (acceptedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Business Process Modeling and Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Digital Transformation in Industry
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Software › Model-Driven Software Engineering Techniques
Keywords
enterprise modeling, enterprise engineering, enterprise architecture, enterprise systems, smart manufacturing, Industry 4.0

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review