Cited by 621Reliability and Maintenance OptimizationMachine Fault Diagnosis TechniquesDigital Transformation in Industry

Machine learning and reasoning for predictive maintenance in Industry 4.0: current status and challenges

Dalzochio, Jovani, Kunst, Rafael, Pignaton, Edison, Binotto, Alecio, Sanyal, Srijnan, Favilla, Jose, Barbosa, Jorge·2020·Computers in Industry

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.compind.2020.103298

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Machine learning algorithms can help robots to predict when maintenance or repairs are required, leading to reduced downtime and cost savings.

    “Predictive Maintenance: Machine learning algorithms can help robots to predict when maintenance or repairs are required, leading to reduced downtime and cost savings [50] .”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dalzochio, J., Kunst, R., Pignaton, E., Binotto, A., Sanyal, S., Favilla, J., & Barbosa, J.
Affiliations
  • Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos (BR)
  • Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (BR)
  • IBM (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
Kunst, Rafael
Venue
Computers in Industry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-12
Volume
123
Pages
103298
ISSN
0166-3615 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3082233933
Cited by
621
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 111 · 2025: 116 · 2024: 122 · 2023: 118 · 2022: 99 · 2021: 53 · 2020: 2
FWCI
58.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Computers in Industry (publishedVersion)
Funders
Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality › Reliability and Maintenance Optimization
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Machine Fault Diagnosis Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Digital Transformation in Industry
Keywords
predictive maintenance, Industry 4.0, failure prediction, machine learning, reasoning, ontology (information science), decision support system, design support system, research challenges

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review