A methodology for automatic generation, formal verification and implementation of safe PLC programs for power supply equipment of the electric lines of railway control systems
Open accessAbstract
To improve the design, Verification and Validation phases of Power Supply Equipment of the Electric Lines control systems at French Railway Company (SNCF for Société nationale des chemins de fer français), this paper proposes an integrated methodology, for automatic generation, formal verification and implementation of safe Programmable Logic Control (PLC) programs. The main objective is to save time and to improve the “overloaded” workflow of systems engineers. This methodology is compliant with the traditional engineering workflow. The first phase of the methodology focuses on the automatic generation of PLC programs, wiring diagrams , and test-based recipe books, based on reusing and adapting similar models of existing projects to the new specifications (corresponding to functional and safety requirements). The second phase is related to the application of formal verification and control synthesis techniques to guarantee the safety of the control installation. The first phase of the methodology has been successfully deployed at SNCF. The second phase is currently being evaluated.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
AI-based process-aware anomaly detection is suitable for detecting command injections that retain protocol legitimacy, whereas traditional OT security solutions are limited in identifying internal manipulations.
“Comparative evaluations show that traditional OT security solutions are limited in identifying internal manipulations because they rely on network-layer signatures, while AI-based process-aware anomaly detection integrates physical process dynamics, making it suitable for detecting command injections that retain protocol legitimacy.”
From ADAPTING PLC/SCADA SYSTEMS TO MITIGATE INDUSTRIAL IOT CYBERSECURITY RISKS IN GLOBAL MANUFACTURING (2024) · cites this paper as Niang et al., 2020
Cited by
Sorted by citations
ADAPTING PLC/SCADA SYSTEMS TO MITIGATE INDUSTRIAL IOT CYBERSECURITY RISKS IN GLOBAL MANUFACTURING
Phillip M. Drayer Department of Electrical Engineering, L. U., Tarek, J. H., Hasan, Z., & Master in Electrical and Electronics Engineering, C. O. E. (2024) · American Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies · doi:10.63125/0v4cms60 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
- Authors
- Niang, M., Riera, B., Philippot, A., Zaytoon, J., Gellot, F., & Coupat, R.
- Affiliations
- Société Nationale des Chemins de Fer Français (France) (FR)
- Centre de Recherche en Sciences et Technologies de l'Information et de la Communication (FR)
- Corresponding author
- Philippot, A.
- Venue
- Computers in Industry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-12
- Volume
- 123
- Pages
- 103328
- ISSN
- 0166-3615 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3094328277
- Cited by
- 22
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1
- FWCI
- 2.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Computers in Industry (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
- HAL (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality › Safety Systems Engineering in Autonomy
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Industrial Automation and Control Systems
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Formal Methods in Verification
- Keywords
- programmable logic controller, formal verification, railway control systems, safety-critical control, wiring diagrams, model reuse, controller synthesis, SNCF
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review