The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Interfacial performance and fracture patterns of 3D printed continuous carbon fiber with sizing reinforced PA6 composites
Abstract
Abstract A sizing procedure was utilized in 3D printing of continuous fiber reinforced thermoplastic composites (CFRTPCs) process to improve their interfacial performance. The sized carbon fiber (SCF) reinforced PA6 (SCF/PA6) was successfully printed, exhibiting 42.2% higher interlaminar shear strength (ILSS) than that of virgin carbon fiber (VCF) reinforced PA6 (VCF/PA6). The influence of sizing and printing process on interfacial performance and fracture patterns was studied systematically. Weak interfacial performance with large fiber pull-out was observed in VCF/PA6. Strong interfacial performance with fiber cut-off arose in SCF/PA6 under excessive forming pressure. They were both detrimental to mechanical properties. Moderate interfacial performance with finite fiber pull-out in SCF/PA6 under decent forming pressure achieved maximum 82% and 246% increasement in flexural strength and modulus respectively. The interface optimization strategy for 3D printed CFRTPCs was set up, which could speed up the technological progress for practical industrial applications.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Kabir, S. M. F., Mathur, K., & Seyam, A.-F. M. (2020) · Composite Structures · doi:10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.111476 · Cited by 678
Additive manufacturing of natural fiber reinforced polymer composites: Processing and prospects
Balla, V. K., Kate, K. H., Satyavolu, J., Singh, P., & Tadimeti, J. G. D. (2019) · Composites Part B: Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.106956 · Cited by 580
Shanmugam, V., Rajendran, D. J. J., Babu, K., Rajendran, S., Veerasimman, A., Marimuthu, U., Singh, S., Das, O., Neisiany, R. E., Hedenqvist, M. S., et al. (2021) · Polymer Testing · doi:10.1016/j.polymertesting.2020.106925 · Cited by 268
Various FDM Mechanisms Used in the Fabrication of Continuous-Fiber Reinforced Composites: A Review
Karimi, A., Rahmatabadi, D., & Baghani, M. (2024) · Polymers · doi:10.3390/polym16060831 · Cited by 201
Metadata
- Authors
- Liu, T., Tian, X., Zhang, M., Abliz, D., Li, D., & Ziegmann, G.
- Venue
- Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-11
- Volume
- 114
- Pages
- 368-376
- ISSN
- 1359-835X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2889064783
- Cited by
- 211
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Interfacial performance and fracture patterns of 3D printed continuous carbon fiber with sizing reinforced PA6 composites. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.compositesa.2018.09.001
- The paper
- Liu, T., Tian, X., Zhang, M., Abliz, D., Li, D., & Ziegmann, G. (2018). Interfacial performance and fracture patterns of 3D printed continuous carbon fiber with sizing reinforced PA6 composites. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2018.09.001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
