Clinical correlates of first-episode polarity in bipolar disorder
Abstract
Objective To determine the clinical and long-term implications of mood polarity at illness onset. Methods During a 10-year follow-up prospective study, systematic clinical and outcome data were collected from 300 bipolar I and II patients. The sample was split into 2 groups according to the polarity of the onset episode (depressive onset [DO] vs manic/hypomanic onset [MO]). Clinical features and social functioning were compared between the 2 groups of patients. Results In our sample, 67% of the patients experienced a depressive onset. Depressive onset patients were more chronic than MO patients, with a higher number of total episodes and a longer duration of illness. Depressive onset patients experienced a higher number of depressive episodes than MO patients, who in turn had more manic episodes. Depressive onset patients made more suicide attempts, had a later illness onset, were less often hospitalized, and were less likely to develop psychotic symptoms. Depressive onset was more prevalent among bipolar II patients. Bipolar I patients with DO had more axis II comorbidity and were more susceptible to have a history of psychotic symptoms than bipolar II patients with DO. Conclusion The polarity at onset is a good predictor of the polarity of subsequent episodes over time. A depressive onset is twice as frequent as MO and carries more chronicity and cyclicity.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Bipolar disorders present initially with a depressive episode in >50% of patients, which is considered the major burden of bipolar disorder in terms of disability and suicide risk.
“Bipolar disorders present initially with a depressive episode in >50 % of patients, which is considered the major burden of bipolar disorder in terms of disability and suicide risk”
From Efficacy of modern antipsychotics in placebo-controlled trials in bipolar depression: a meta-analysis (2010) · cites this paper as Daban et al. 2006
Cites
The Long-term Natural History of the Weekly Symptomatic Status of Bipolar I Disorder
Judd, L. L., Akiskal, H. S., Schettler, P. J., Endicott, J., Maser, J., Solomon, D. A., Leon, A. C., Rice, J. A., & Keller, M. B. (2002) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.59.6.530 · Cited by 2,106 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Bipolar II disorder: arguments for and against a distinct diagnostic entity
Vieta, E., & Suppes, T. (2008) · Bipolar Disorders · doi:10.1111/j.1399-5618.2007.00561.x · Cited by 200 · see citing works
Self-citationCruz, N., Sanchez-Moreno, J., Torres, F., Goikolea, J. M., Valentí, M., & Vieta, E. (2010) · The International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1017/s1461145709990344 · Cited by 121 · see citing works
Self-citationEarly determinants of four‐year clinical outcomes in bipolar disorder with psychosis
Carlson, G. A., Kotov, R., Chang, S., Ruggero, C., & Bromet, E. J. (2012) · Bipolar Disorders · doi:10.1111/j.1399-5618.2012.00982.x · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Young, A. H., McElroy, S. L., Olausson, B., Paulsson, B., (D1447C00001), O. B. O. T. E. I., & Embolden II (D1447C00134) Investigators (2014) · The World Journal of Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.3109/15622975.2012.665177 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Making sense of DSM-5 mania with depressive features
Reinares, M., del Mar Bonnín, C., Hidalgo-Mazzei, D., Undurraga, J., Mur, M., Nieto, E., Sáez, C., & Vieta, E. (2015) · Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1177/0004867415585583 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Self-citationAssociation between polarity of first episode and solar insolation in bipolar I disorder
Bauer, M., Glenn, T., Achtyes, E. D., Alda, M., Agaoglu, E., Altınbaş, K., Andreassen, O. A., Angelopoulos, E., Ardau, R., Aydin, M., et al. (2022) · Journal of Psychosomatic Research · doi:10.1016/j.jpsychores.2022.110982 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Daban, C., Colom, F., Sanchez-Moreno, J., García-Amador, M., & Vieta, E.
- Affiliations
- Hospital Clínic de Barcelona (ES)
- Universitat de Barcelona (ES)
- Corresponding author
- Vieta, Eduard
- Venue
- Comprehensive Psychiatry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2006-11
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 433-437
- ISSN
- 0010-440X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2118597235
- Cited by
- 138
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 10
- FWCI
- 4.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Comprehensive Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Stanley Medical Research Institute
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
- Keywords
- bipolar disorder, bipolar I disorder, bipolar II disorder, illness chronicity, episode frequency, suicide attempts, psychotic symptoms, social functioning, hospitalization
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Affect, Bipolar Disorder, Chronic Disease, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Hospitalization, Humans, Male, Prognosis, Prospective Studies, Psychotic Disorders, Social Behavior, Spain, Statistics as Topic, Suicide, Attempted
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review