Cited by 91Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum DisordersHair Growth and DisordersEating Disorders and Behaviors

Clinical characteristics of trichotillomania with trichophagia

Open access
Grant, Jon E., Odlaug, Brian L.·2008·Comprehensive Psychiatry

Abstract

Objective Little is known about trichophagia in individuals with trichotillomania. Although studies have mentioned the behavior, no previous studies have examined clinical correlates of trichophagia.Method We examined the clinical correlates of trichophagia in 68 subjects with Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, trichotillomania (85.3% females; mean age, 35.0 +/- 12.5). Comorbidity data were obtained with the Structured Clinical Interview for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition. Trichotillomania severity was assessed with the Psychiatric Institute Trichotillomania Scale and the Massachusetts General Hospital Hairpulling Scale. Social/occupational functioning was examined using the Sheehan Disability Scale. All variables were compared in trichotillomania subjects with and without trichophagia.Results Of the 68 subjects with trichotillomania, 14 (20.6%; 95% confidence interval, 12.7%-31.6%) reported current trichophagia, and an additional 9 (13.2%) ate their hair or the root episodically. There were far more similarities than differences in trichotillomania subjects with current trichophagia and those without, although those with trichophagia were significantly more likely to be male (P = .013) and have more severe trichotillomania (according to the Massachusetts General Hospital Hairpulling Scale) (P = .010).Conclusions These preliminary results suggest that trichophagia is not uncommon in individuals with trichophagia. Subjects with and without trichophagia were similar in most domains that were examined.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.comppsych.2008.05.002

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Approximately 10%-20% of people with trichotillomania eat their hair after pulling it ("trichophagia"), which can result in gastrointestinal obstruction and the formation of intestinal hair-balls ("trichobezoars") which can require surgical intervention.

    “Approximately 10%–20% of people with trichotillomania eat their hair after pulling it (“trichophagia”), which can result in gastrointestinal obstruction and the formation of intestinal hair-balls (“trichobezoars”) which can require surgical intervention.[14]”

    From Trichotillomania (hair pulling disorder) (2019) · cites this paper as [14]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. [8]DeBakey M Ochsner A Bezoars and concretions: comprehensive review of literature with analysis of 303 collected cases and presentation of 8 additional cases Surgery 1939 5 132 160
  2. [10]Gockel I Gaedertz C Hain HJ Winckelmann U Albani M Lorenz D The Rapunzel syndrome: rare manifestation of a trichobezoar of the upper gastrointestinal tract Chirurg 2003 74 8 753 756 12928798
  3. [19]Koblenzer CS Stein DJ Christianson GA Hollander E Psychoanalytic perspectives on trichotillomania Trichotillomania 1999 125 46 American Psychiatric Press Washington, DC
  4. [20]First MB Spitzer RL Gibbon M Williams JBW Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV-Patient Edition (SCID-I/P, Version 2.0) 1995 Biometrics Research Department, New York State Psychiatric Institute New York, NY
  5. [29]Cohen J Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavior Sciences 1988 Academic Press New York 2nd Edition

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Grant, J. E., & Odlaug, B. L.
Affiliations
University of Minnesota (US)
Corresponding author
Grant, Jon E.
Venue
Comprehensive Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-11
Volume
49
Issue
6
Pages
579-584
ISSN
0010-440X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1985736494
Cited by
91
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Comprehensive Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5k23mh069754-03)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (K23 MH069754)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Hair Growth and Disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
Keywords
trichotillomania, trichophagia, hair pulling, clinical correlates, comorbidities, social and occupational functioning, sex differences
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Mental Disorders, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Pica, Severity of Illness Index, Trichotillomania, United States, Comorbidity, Sex Distribution

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review