Cognitive emotion regulation strategies contributing to resilience in patients with depression and/or anxiety disorders
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE Research suggests that resilience is associated with favorable treatment outcome in patients with depression and/or anxiety disorders. In this regard, the identification of specific characteristics related to resilience that could provide targets for resilience-enhancement interventions is needed. Since the type of cognitive coping strategies is a possible marker of resilience, we investigated adaptive and maladaptive cognitive emotion regulation strategies contributing to resilience in patients with depression and/or anxiety disorders. METHODS A total of 230 outpatients with depression and anxiety disorders were consecutively recruited and completed the Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire, the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale, the Beck Depression Inventory, and the State Anxiety Inventory. A linear regression model was used to determine which cognitive emotion regulation strategies predicted resilience after controlling for relevant covariates. Additionally, this model of resilience was compared with those of depression and anxiety symptoms. RESULTS Adaptive strategies were more strongly correlated with resilience than maladaptive strategies. In the regression model, more use of refocus on planning and positive reappraisal as well as less use of rumination predicted high resilience after controlling for age, gender, marital status, depression, and anxiety. Among these strategies, refocus on planning was the common strategy contributing to resilience and depression. CONCLUSION These results suggested that the cognitive emotion regulation strategies of refocus on planning, positive reappraisal, and less rumination contribute to resilience in patients with depression and anxiety disorders. It might provide potential targets for psychotherapeutic intervention to improve resilience in these patients.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Trait use of Reappraisal is a predictor of psychological well-being and resilience.
“Furthermore, trait use of Reappraisal is a predictor of psychological well-being and resilience (McRae et al., 2012b;Min et al., 2013).”
From Compassion-based emotion regulation up-regulates experienced positive affect and associated neural networks (2015) · cites this paper as Min et al., 2013
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 75 · Cited by 253
- Authors
- Min, J.-A., Yu, J. J., Lee, C.-U., & Chae, J.-H.
- Affiliations
- The Catholic University of Korea Seoul St. Mary's Hospital (KR)
- University of Tasmania (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Chae, Jeong-Ho
- Venue
- Comprehensive Psychiatry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2013-11
- Volume
- 54
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1190-1197
- ISSN
- 0010-440X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2171138470
- Semantic Scholar
- 07dec701e98695977ecd8dae8a011a299603f8b2
- Cited by
- 253
- References
- 75
- Citations by year
- 2026: 14 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 10
- FWCI
- 8.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- figshare.com
- Licence
- Locations
- Comprehensive Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania) (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Resilience and Mental Health
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Optimism, Hope, and Well-being
- Keywords
- cognitive emotion regulation, resilience, depression, anxiety disorders, adaptive coping, maladaptive coping, positive reappraisal, rumination
- MeSH terms
- Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Anxiety Disorders, Cognition, Depressive Disorder, Emotions, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Resilience, Psychological, Catastrophization
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
