Cited by 175Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsPsychological Well-being and Life SatisfactionNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Compassion-based emotion regulation up-regulates experienced positive affect and associated neural networks

Open access
Engen, Haakon G., Singer, Tania·2015·Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience

Abstract

Emotion regulation research has primarily focused on techniques that attenuate or modulate the impact of emotional stimuli. Recent evidence suggests that this mode regulation can be problematic in the context of regulation of emotion elicited by the suffering of others, resulting in reduced emotional connectedness. Here, we investigated the effects of an alternative emotion regulation technique based on the up-regulation of positive affect via Compassion-meditation on experiential and neural affective responses to depictions of individuals in distress, and compared these with the established emotion regulation strategy of Reappraisal. Using fMRI, we scanned 15 expert practitioners of Compassion-meditation either passively viewing, or using Compassion-meditation or Reappraisal to modulate their emotional reactions to film clips depicting people in distress. Both strategies effectively, but differentially regulated experienced affect, with Compassion primarily increasing positive and Reappraisal primarily decreasing negative affect. Imaging results showed that Compassion, relative to both passive-viewing and Reappraisal increased activation in regions involved in affiliation, positive affect and reward processing including ventral striatum and medial orbitfrontal cortex. This network was shown to be active prior to stimulus presentation, suggesting that the regulatory mechanism of Compassion is the stimulus-independent endogenous generation of positive affect.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

In 15 expert Compassion meditators, Compassion-based emotion regulation increased experienced positive affect and engaged reward/affiliation networks (VS/NACC, mOFC) more than Reappraisal, while Reappraisal more strongly decreased negative affect and engaged fronto-parietal control regions. Compassion-related VS/NACC activation was present before stimulus presentation, suggesting stimulus-independent endogenous generation of positive affect.

Key findings

  • Both Compassion and Reappraisal regulated affect relative to Watch-Negative, but Compassion produced higher positive affect than Reappraisal (m = 50.29, SE = 13.73, t(882) = 3.66, P < 0.005), and only Compassion increased positive affect above Watch-Neutral (m = 46.28, SE = 11.89, t(882) = 3.89, P < 0.001); Reappraisal was associated with lower negative affect than Compassion (m = −54.74, SE = 9.71, t(882) = −5.64, P < 0.001).
  • Whole-brain contrasts showed Compassion > Watch-Negative activated VS/NACC, mOFC/vmPFC, pgACC/sgACC, mid-insula, and other regions; Compassion > Reappraisal was strongest in mOFC and VS/NACC, whereas Reappraisal > Compassion engaged dlPFC, IFG, SMG/TPJ, and related control regions.
  • ROI analyses showed Compassion increased VS/NAC (t(312) = 3.32, P < 0.001) and decreased amygdala (t(312) = −2.17, P < 0.05) relative to Watch-Negative; Reappraisal decreased amygdala (t(312) = −5.4, P < 0.001) but did not increase VS/NAC. Direct comparison showed higher VS/NAC for Compassion than Reappraisal (F(1,312) = 11.16, P < 0.001; Condition × Period F(1,312) = 3.96, P < 0.05) and lower amygdala for Reappraisal than Compassion (t(312) = −2.42, P < 0.05).
  • Compassion-related activation in the VS/NACC network was evident prior to stimulus presentation, supporting the interpretation that Compassion works via stimulus-independent endogenous positive affect generation.

Methods

  • Fifteen expert Nyingma Tibetan Buddhist meditators (5 women; age range 45–62 years, mean 56.1 ± 4.6; estimated 40,000 ± 9,000 h meditation, range 10,000–62,000 h; all completed at least one 3-year full-time retreat) completed fMRI; 18 were recruited.
  • Participants viewed 40 negative and 20 neutral 10–12 s film clips in an adapted socio-affective video task across two sessions; conditions included Reappraisal, Distraction, Watch-Negative, Watch-Neutral, Compassion, and Open-Presence, with 10 trials per condition per session (40 total trials), and rated positive and negative affect on a 600-point visual analogue scale.
  • fMRI preprocessing used SPM8; analyses used finite impulse response deconvolution, GLMFlex repeated-measures models, cluster-level FWE correction, and ROI analyses in NACC/VS and amygdala regions tracking reported positive and negative affect.

Limitations

  • Stated: generalizability is limited because participants had extensive experience generating Compassion, especially regarding the relative efficacy of Reappraisal and Compassion; the design also cannot directly test whether proactive vs reactive Compassion generation differs in efficacy.
  • Evident: the sample was small (15 completers), all expert meditators, all Western European Caucasians, and lacked a non-meditator control group, so findings may not generalize to novices or the general population.
  • Evident: Distraction and Open-Presence conditions were collected but not analyzed in this paper.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/scan/nsv008

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

0 of 38 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Findingown data

    The Watch-Negative > Watch-Neutral contrast showed increased activation of core affective processing regions such as amygdala and insula, in addition to widespread activation of regions associated with both cognitive and perceptual components of affect.

    “The Watch-Negative > Watch-Neutral contrast served as a validation contrast for successful emotion induction, and showed increased activation of core affective processing regions such as amygdala and insula, in addition to widespread activation of regions associated with both cognitive and perceptual components of affect.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    Compassion was associated with significantly higher positive affect than Reappraisal.

    “Importantly, direct comparison of Compassion and Reappraisal revealed that Compassion was associated with significantly higher positive affect [m ¼ 50.29,SE ¼ 13.73), t( 882”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    The Reappraisal > Watch-Negative contrast revealed a pattern of results closely resembling previous work, including fronto-parietal activation and deactivation of amygdala.

    “This revealed a pattern of results closely resembling previous work (e.g.Goldin et al., 2008;Buhle et al., 2014), including fronto-parietal activation and deactivation of amygdala (Supplementary Figure S1).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Goldin et al., 2008 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Buhle et al., 2014

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Findingown data

    For amygdala, only a main effect of Condition was observed.

    “For the amygdala, only a main effect of Condition was observed [F(1, 312) ¼ 5.84, P < 0.05].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingown data

    This network was shown to be active prior to stimulus presentation.

    “This network was shown to be active prior to stimulus presentation, suggesting that the regulatory mechanism of Compassion is the stimulus-independent endogenous generation of positive affect.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims. 29
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 3
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 19
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Both Compassion and Reappraisal decreased negative and increased positive affect relative to the Negative-Watch condition, demonstrating their efficacy at regulating affective states.

    “Further comparisons revealed that both Compassion and Reappraisal decreased negative [Compassion: (m ¼ À56.13, SE ¼ 10.37), t(882) ¼ À5.41, P < 0.001); Reappraisal: (m ¼ À54.74, SE ¼ 9.71), t(882) ¼ À5.64, P < 0.001] and increased positive affect [Compassion: (m ¼ 101, SE ¼ 11,89), t(882) ¼ 8.50, P < 0.001; Reappraisal: m ¼ À97.82, SE ¼ 10.37), t(882) ¼ À9.43, P < 0.001] relative to the Negative-W”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingown data

    During the implementation phase, Compassion relative to Watch-Negative showed substantial activations in medial PFC including vmPFC and mOFC, genual ACC and SMA, left dorsolateral and ventrolateral prefrontal regions, SMG/TPJ, posterior cingulate, temporal gyri, cerebellum, and subcortical VS including NACC, globus pallidus, caudate, putamen, hypothalamus and right amygdala.

    “In the Implementation phase (Figure 2B), substantial activations were observed in medial PFC, including vmPFC and mOFC, as well as genual ACC and SMA.Left dorsolateral and ventrolateral prefrontal activations were again observed, including middle and superior frontal gyrii (SFG), as well as the orbital portion of the triangular and orbital IFG.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Positive and negative emotion ratings showed a significant main effect of Condition for both Positive [F(3, 882) = 26.66, P < 0.001] and Negative [F(3, 882) = 176.10, P < 0.001] ratings.

    “This revealed a significant main effect of Condition for both Positive [F(3, 882) ¼ 26.66, P < 0.001] and Negative [F(3, 882) ¼ 176.10,P < 0.001] ratings.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The Negative-Watch condition elicited significantly more negative and significantly less positive affect than the Neutral-Watch condition, demonstrating successful emotion induction.

    “These revealed that the Negative-Watch condition elicited significantly more negative [m ¼ 191.19,SE ¼ 8.47), t(882) ¼ 22.58, P < 0.001] and significantly less positive [m ¼ À54.74, SE ¼ 9.71, t(882) ¼ À5.64, P < 0.001] affect than the Neutral-Watch condition, demonstrating successful emotion induction.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingown data

    During the preparation phase, Compassion relative to Watch-Negative showed activations in lateral frontal regions, parietal lobules, medial frontopolar/mOFC/vmPFC, pgACC/sgACC, PCC, thalamus, hypothalamus, VS, and cerebellum.

    “In the preparation phase (Figure 2A), activations were observed laterally in frontal regions, including middle frontal gyrus (MFG) and triangular/orbital junction of the inferior frontal gyrus (IFG), sup- plementary motor area (SMA), as well as superior and inferor parietal lobules.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    In the preparation phase, Compassion relative to Reappraisal showed higher activation primarily in medial frontal regions including vmPFC/gyrus rectus, pgACC, sgACC, dorsal ACC/SMA, precuneus, bilateral STG and right IFG/operculum ranging into mid-insula; Reappraisal showed higher activation in posterior and polar MTG, posterior cingulate/precuneus and cerebellum.

    “In the Preparation phase (Figure 3A), higher activation was found for the Compassion condition primarily in medial frontal regions, including vmPFC/gyrus rectus, pgACC, sgACC, dorsal ACC/SMA, precuneus.Additional activations were observed in bilateral superior temporal gyrus (STG) and right IFG/operculum ranging into mid-insula.In contrast, higher activation for the Reappraisal condition was found”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    In the Compassion condition, VS/NAC signal was higher and amygdala signal was lower relative to the Watch-Negative condition.

    “Follow-up t-tests showed that this effect consisted of higher signal in the VS/NAC [t(312) ¼ 3.32, P ¼ < 0.001] and lower signal [t(342) ¼ À2.17, P ¼ < 0.05] in the amygdala ROIs relative to the Watch-Negative condition.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Compassion relied primarily on activation of medial and subcortical systems, with strongest differentiation in mOFC and VS/NACC.

    “Contrary to this, Compassion was shown to rely primarily on activation of the aforementioned medial and subcortical systems, with the strongest differentiation observable in mOFC and VS/NACC (Figure 3).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Compassion increased positive affect above Watch-Neutral baseline, whereas Reappraisal did not.

    “Importantly, unlike Reappraisal, Compassion occasioned an increase of positive affect relative to baseline levels of positivity (Watch-Neutral).”
    • Also stated in: § CONCLUSION · plain
      “only Compassion increased positive affect above the Watch-Neutral condition [Compassion: (m ¼ 46.28, SE ¼ 11.89), t(882) ¼ 3.89, P < 0.001; Reappraisal: (m ¼ À4.01, SE ¼ 11.89), t(882) ¼ À0.34, P > 0.1]”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    While both Compassion and Reappraisal decreased activation of amygdala relative to Watch-Negative, only Compassion increased activation of VS/NAC.

    “Thus, while both Compassion and Reappraisal was shown to decrease activation of amygdala relative to Watch-Negative, only Compassion was shown to increase activation of VS/ NAC.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Both Compassion and Reappraisal effectively, but differentially regulated experienced affect, with Compassion primarily increasing positive and Reappraisal primarily decreasing negative affect.

    “Both strategies effectively, but differentially regulated experienced affect, with Compassion primarily increasing positive and Reappraisal primarily decreasing negative affect.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingown data

    In the implementation phase, Compassion relative to Reappraisal showed increased activation in medial PFC including vmPFC, mOFC, sgACC, pgACC, frontopolar cortex, bilateral SMA and mid-cingulate, bilateral operculum/mid-insula, STG, precuneus, right fusiform gyrus, and subcortically NACC/VS, bilateral amygdala, hypothalamus, caudate, globus pallidus, putamen, right hippocampus and ventral anterior

    “For the Implementation phase (Figure 3B), increased activation was found for the Compassion condition in medial PFC, including vmPFC, mOFC, sgACC, pgACC, frontopolar cortex, bilateral SMA and mid-cingulate.Laterally, activations were observed in bilateral operculum/mid-insula, STG, precuneus and right fusiform gyrus.Subcortically, activations were observed in NACC/VS, bilateral amygdala,”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Both Compassion and Reappraisal decreased negative affect, with Reappraisal decreasing it significantly more.

    “Both compassion and Reappraisal decreased negative affect, though Reappraisal did so significantly more.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    For VS/NAC, there was a main effect of Condition and a Condition*Period interaction effect.

    “For the VS/NAC, this revealed a main effect of Condition, [F(1, 312) ¼ 11.16, P < 0.001] as well as a Condition* Period interaction effect [F(1, 312) ¼ 3.96, P < 0.05].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    All meditators had participated in at least one 3-year full-time retreat at the same institution, in which they practiced these techniques and underwent instruction by the same teachers, ensuring homogenous and expert implementation of Compassion.

    “Further, all meditators had participated in at least one 3-year full-time retreat at the same institution, in which they practiced these techniques and underwent instruction by the same teachers.This ensured homogenous and expert implementation of Compassion allowing us to describe the workings of the technique at its optimum.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    Positive Reappraisal was chosen to ensure comparability with Compassion in terms of regulatory goal.

    “We chose to use positive Reappraisal to ensure comparability of with Compassion in terms of regulatory goal.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Trait use of Reappraisal is a predictor of psychological well-being and resilience.

    “Furthermore, trait use of Reappraisal is a predictor of psychological well-being and resilience (McRae et al., 2012b;Min et al., 2013).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites McRae et al., 2012b

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Min et al., 2013 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The default response pattern to stimuli depicting individuals in distress is negative affect, presumably stemming from empathic distress reactions.

    “From previous work (Klimecki et al., 2013a,b) we know that the default response pattern to such stimuli is negative affect, presumably stemming from empathic distress reactions (Condon and Feldman Barrett, 2013), and that training is needed in order to generate loving-kindness and compassion when confronted with others' suffering.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Condon and Feldman Barrett, 2013

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Compassion is an appropriate regulation strategy in contexts where emotional connection is important since it does not involve the alteration of one's emotional reactions to stressors directly, but rather the countergeneration of a positive affective state.

    “These qualities suggest the appropriateness of Compassion as a regulation strategy in contexts where emotional connection is important since it does not involve the alteration of ones emotional reactions to stressors directly, but rather the countergeneration of a positive affective state.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The socio-affective video task has previously been successfully used in Compassion research and is optimized to elicit extended negative affect of a social nature.

    “This task has previously been successfully used in previous Compassion research and is optimized to elicit extended negative affect of a social nature.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Klimecki et al., 2014 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductreasoning

    A finite impulse response deconvolution approach was used to ensure robustness of the analyses in the face of potential differences in temporal dynamics of the conditions.

    “To ensure robustness of the analyses in the face of potential differences in temporal dynamics of the conditions, a finite impulse response deconvolution approach was used.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The neural implementation of Compassion and Reappraisal appears to mirror their conceptual differences, in that Compassion involves the volitional endogenous generation of an emotional and motivational state rather than alteration of exogenously triggered states through cognitive control and self-regulation, as seen in Reappraisal.

    “As such, the neural implementation of Compassion and Reappraisal appears to mirror their conceptual differences, in that Compassion involves the volitional endogenous generation of an emotional and motivational state rather than alteration of exogenously triggered states through cognitive control and self-regulation, as seen in Reappraisal.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Reappraisal is effective across a wide range of different emotional stimuli and contexts.

    “This strategy, most frequently called Reappraisal, has been shown to be effective across a wide range of different emotional stimuli and contexts (Gross, 2014).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Gross, 2014

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    Meditation experience was estimated at a cumulative total of 40,000 ± 9,000 h (range 10,000-62,000 h).

    “Meditation experience was assessed through semi-structured interviews, showing an estimated cumulative total of 40 000 Æ 9000 h of meditation (range ¼ 10 000-62 000 h).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Compassion-meditation involves the initial generation of an emotional state of loving-kindness through directed imagery emphasizing positive emotional qualities of warmth, care and other-related concern, which can then be applied to the suffering of others, turning the initial state of loving-kindness into one of compassion.

    “Concretely, Compassionmeditation involves the initial generation of an emotional state of loving-kindness through directed imagery emphasizing positive emotional qualities of warmth, care and other-related concern.Once this emotional state is achieved it can then be applied to the suffering of others, turning the initial state of loving-kindness into one of compassion (Singer and Klimecki, 2014).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Singer and Klimecki, 2014 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductcitation

    The stimuli were short film clips (10-12 s; 40 negative and 20 neutral) taken from the previously validated SoVT stimulus set.

    “The stimuli were short film clips (10-12 s in length; 40 negative and 20 neutral stimuli) taken from the previously validated SoVT stimulus set (for details see Klimecki et al., 2013a).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Klimecki et al., 2013a

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    As controlled breathing is a key component of meditation, potential respiratory artifacts and confounds were accounted for by despiking the data and removing the run-specific global signal for each voxel.

    “As controlled breathing is a key component of meditation, we accounted for potential respiratory artifacts and confounds by despiking the data using the ArtRepair toolbox (version 4, http:// cibsr.stanford.edu/tools/human-brain-project/artrepair-software.html) and removing the run-specific global signal for each voxel (Macey et al., 2004) in line with previous work (e.g.Farb et al., 2013).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Macey et al., 2004 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Farb et al., 2013 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductown data

    Multiple comparisons were controlled for using cluster-level FWE correction at < 0.05 (T > 3.36, P = 0.001, k > 30) as determined by AFNI's AlphaSim Monte Carlo simulation method.

    “Multiple comparisons were controlled for using cluster-level FWE correction at < 0.05 (T > 3.36, P ¼ 0.001, k > 30) as determined by AFNI's AlphaSim Monte Carlo simulation method.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    Stimulus and session order were counterbalanced across subjects.

    “Stimulus and session order were counterbalanced across subjects.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Reappraisal involves discounting negative information as it is perceived and substituting a more positive interpretation.

    “One explanation for this is that Reappraisal involves discounting negative information as it is perceived, and substituting a more positive interpretation.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Training in Compassion-meditation aims at enabling the individual to volitionally generate states of compassion, allowing them to encounter the suffering of others while maintaining a positive emotional state of benevolence, warmth and concern and a motivation to help.

    “Training in Compassion-meditation aims at enabling the individual to volitionally generate states of compassion, allowing them to encounter the suffering of others while maintaining a positive emotional state of benevolence, warmth and concern and a motivation to help (Lutz et al., 2008;Klimecki et al., 2013a;Kok et al., 2013).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Lutz et al., 2008 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Klimecki et al., 2013a

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Kok et al., 2013 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    To ensure homogeneity in strategy execution, subjects were asked to describe each strategy in their own words prior to the start of training and to describe in detail exactly how they implemented the strategy after each practice trial, with misunderstandings corrected when apparent.

    “To ensure homogeneity in strategy execution, subjects were asked to describe each strategy in their own words prior to the start of training and to describe in detail exactly how they implemented the strategy after each practice trial, with misunderstandings corrected when apparent.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    The fronto-parietal network regions (ventral/dorsal PFC, dACC, TPJ/SMG) are known to be associated with cognitive control, attention regulation, and working memory.

    “regions known to be associated with cognitive control, attention regulation and working memory (Ochsner et al., 2012).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Ochsner et al., 2012 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The different activation patterns reflect that Reappraisal involves cognitive control to modulate affective influences, whereas Compassion involves generation of positive affect without altering processing of negative stimuli.

    “These different activation patterns appear to reflect the conceptual difference between Reappraisal and Compassion: Reappraisal involves the employment of cognitive control to modulate affective influences, whereas Compassion involves the generation of positive affect, without altering the processing of negative stimuli.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Compassion is an effective regulation strategy and a key mechanism is engagement of neural systems associated with positive affect.

    “Overall, these results are consistent with previous findings (Klimecki et al., 2013a,b), demonstrating that Compassion is an effective regulation strategy and that a key mechanism underlying these regulatory effects is the engagement of neural systems associated with positive affect.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Klimecki et al., 2013a,b

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductnone given

    All P-values were Bonferroni corrected.

    “All P-values Bonferroni corrected.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Compassion can be employed as an effective emotion regulation strategy outside of its traditional meditative context, and both experientially and neurally it is associated with endogenous generation of positive affect.

    “In this study, we showed that Compassion can be employed as an effective emotion regulation strategy outside of its traditional meditative context, and that both experientially and neurally, it is associated with the endogenous generation of positive affect.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    Using Compassion as a coping strategy in helping professions would have an additional beneficial effect: it would increase resilience and increase willingness to assist individuals in need.

    “suggesting an additional beneficial effect if used as coping strategy in helping professions as it would not only increase resilience but also increase their willingness to assist individuals in need.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Compassion might be an effective means to promote resilience to others' suffering also in the general population while promoting emotional connectedness and pro-sociality.

    “This suggests that Compassion might be an effective means to promote resilience to others' suffering also in the general population while at the same time promoting emotional connectedness and pro-sociality.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Compassion's capacity to be employed independently of specific stimuli and its mechanism not involving attenuation/alteration of negative emotional responses potentially affords it unique advantages as an emotion regulation strategy.

    “The capacity to be employed independently of specific stimuli and an underlying mechanism not involving attenuation or alteration of negative emotional responses potentially affords Compassion some unique advantages as an emotion regulation strategy.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Bilateral mid-insula is previously associated with affiliative types of positive affect, such as maternal love.

    “a region previously associated with specifically affiliative types of positive affect, such as maternal love (Bartels and Zeki, 2004).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Bartels and Zeki, 2004 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In the context of others' suffering, Compassion affords maintenance of an empathic connection while counteracting empathic distress.

    “In the context of others' suffering, Compassion affords maintenance of an empathic connection while counteracting empathic distress (Singer and Klimecki, 2014).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Singer and Klimecki, 2014 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductown data

    All results were thresholded at FWEc < 0.05 as determined by AFNI's AlphaSim (P < 0.001, extent threshold = 30 voxels).

    “All results thresholded at FWEc < 0.05 as determined by AFNI's AlphaSim (P < 0.001, extent threshold ¼ 30 voxels).”
    • Also stated in: § CONCLUSION · plain
      “All results thresholded at FWEc < 0.05 as determined by AFNI's AlphaSim (P < 0.001, extent threshold ¼ 30 voxels).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationcitation

    Our findings are largely consistent with earlier work on short-term effects of Compassion training by Klimecki et al. (2013a,b).

    “Our findings are largely consistent with earlier work on short-term effects of Compassion training by Klimecki et al. (2013a,b).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Klimecki et al., 2013a,b

      Not checked in the free run.

44 of 44

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • On a neural level, compassion was accompanied by activations in reward and positive emotion related networks.

    “On a neural level, compassion was accompanied by activations in reward and positive emotion related networks [14 ].”
  • Compassion can be viewed as an emotion-regulation strategy that buffers negative affect through the active generation of positive affect relying on reward-related and affiliation-related brain circuitries.

    “Compassion can thus be viewed as an emotionregulation strategy that buffers negative affect through the active generation of positive affect relying on rewardrelated and affiliation-related brain circuitries.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Significant VS/NAC difference is assigned to the wrong period

    Major

    The text says Compassion exceeded Reappraisal specifically during Implementation, but the accompanying tests report a significant difference during Preparation and a nonsignificant difference during Implementation.

  • Reported Reappraisal positive-affect contrast has the wrong value and direction

    Major

    Reappraisal is reported as 4.01 points below Watch-Neutral, while Watch-Negative is 54.74 points below Watch-Neutral. Those values put Reappraisal 50.73 points above Watch-Negative, not 97.82 points below it.

    Reported -97.82 · recomputed 50.73

2 of 2

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Gross, 2014, Emotion regulation: conceptual foundations and empirical foundations, 3

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Engen, H. G., & Singer, T.
Affiliations
Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences (DE)
Venue
Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience
Published
2015-02-19
Volume
10
Issue
9
Pages
1291-1301
ISSN
  • 1749-5016 (ISSN-L)
  • 1749-5024
OpenAlex
W2101584513
Cited by
175
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 39 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 3
FWCI
15.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
FP7 Ideas: European Research Council (205557)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
compassion meditation, emotion regulation, cognitive reappraisal, positive affect, negative affect, compassion for others, emotional connection, ventral striatum, medial orbitofrontal cortex, reward processing, affiliation
MeSH terms
Affect, Brain, Emotions, Empathy, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Nerve Net, Meditation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-10.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-10.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review