Compassion-based emotion regulation up-regulates experienced positive affect and associated neural networks
Open accessAbstract
Emotion regulation research has primarily focused on techniques that attenuate or modulate the impact of emotional stimuli. Recent evidence suggests that this mode regulation can be problematic in the context of regulation of emotion elicited by the suffering of others, resulting in reduced emotional connectedness. Here, we investigated the effects of an alternative emotion regulation technique based on the up-regulation of positive affect via Compassion-meditation on experiential and neural affective responses to depictions of individuals in distress, and compared these with the established emotion regulation strategy of Reappraisal. Using fMRI, we scanned 15 expert practitioners of Compassion-meditation either passively viewing, or using Compassion-meditation or Reappraisal to modulate their emotional reactions to film clips depicting people in distress. Both strategies effectively, but differentially regulated experienced affect, with Compassion primarily increasing positive and Reappraisal primarily decreasing negative affect. Imaging results showed that Compassion, relative to both passive-viewing and Reappraisal increased activation in regions involved in affiliation, positive affect and reward processing including ventral striatum and medial orbitfrontal cortex. This network was shown to be active prior to stimulus presentation, suggesting that the regulatory mechanism of Compassion is the stimulus-independent endogenous generation of positive affect.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
In 15 expert Compassion meditators, Compassion-based emotion regulation increased experienced positive affect and engaged reward/affiliation networks (VS/NACC, mOFC) more than Reappraisal, while Reappraisal more strongly decreased negative affect and engaged fronto-parietal control regions. Compassion-related VS/NACC activation was present before stimulus presentation, suggesting stimulus-independent endogenous generation of positive affect.
Key findings
- Both Compassion and Reappraisal regulated affect relative to Watch-Negative, but Compassion produced higher positive affect than Reappraisal (m = 50.29, SE = 13.73, t(882) = 3.66, P < 0.005), and only Compassion increased positive affect above Watch-Neutral (m = 46.28, SE = 11.89, t(882) = 3.89, P < 0.001); Reappraisal was associated with lower negative affect than Compassion (m = −54.74, SE = 9.71, t(882) = −5.64, P < 0.001).
- Whole-brain contrasts showed Compassion > Watch-Negative activated VS/NACC, mOFC/vmPFC, pgACC/sgACC, mid-insula, and other regions; Compassion > Reappraisal was strongest in mOFC and VS/NACC, whereas Reappraisal > Compassion engaged dlPFC, IFG, SMG/TPJ, and related control regions.
- ROI analyses showed Compassion increased VS/NAC (t(312) = 3.32, P < 0.001) and decreased amygdala (t(312) = −2.17, P < 0.05) relative to Watch-Negative; Reappraisal decreased amygdala (t(312) = −5.4, P < 0.001) but did not increase VS/NAC. Direct comparison showed higher VS/NAC for Compassion than Reappraisal (F(1,312) = 11.16, P < 0.001; Condition × Period F(1,312) = 3.96, P < 0.05) and lower amygdala for Reappraisal than Compassion (t(312) = −2.42, P < 0.05).
- Compassion-related activation in the VS/NACC network was evident prior to stimulus presentation, supporting the interpretation that Compassion works via stimulus-independent endogenous positive affect generation.
Methods
- Fifteen expert Nyingma Tibetan Buddhist meditators (5 women; age range 45–62 years, mean 56.1 ± 4.6; estimated 40,000 ± 9,000 h meditation, range 10,000–62,000 h; all completed at least one 3-year full-time retreat) completed fMRI; 18 were recruited.
- Participants viewed 40 negative and 20 neutral 10–12 s film clips in an adapted socio-affective video task across two sessions; conditions included Reappraisal, Distraction, Watch-Negative, Watch-Neutral, Compassion, and Open-Presence, with 10 trials per condition per session (40 total trials), and rated positive and negative affect on a 600-point visual analogue scale.
- fMRI preprocessing used SPM8; analyses used finite impulse response deconvolution, GLMFlex repeated-measures models, cluster-level FWE correction, and ROI analyses in NACC/VS and amygdala regions tracking reported positive and negative affect.
Limitations
- Stated: generalizability is limited because participants had extensive experience generating Compassion, especially regarding the relative efficacy of Reappraisal and Compassion; the design also cannot directly test whether proactive vs reactive Compassion generation differs in efficacy.
- Evident: the sample was small (15 completers), all expert meditators, all Western European Caucasians, and lacked a non-meditator control group, so findings may not generalize to novices or the general population.
- Evident: Distraction and Open-Presence conditions were collected but not analyzed in this paper.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 38 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Findingown data
The Watch-Negative > Watch-Neutral contrast showed increased activation of core affective processing regions such as amygdala and insula, in addition to widespread activation of regions associated with both cognitive and perceptual components of affect.
“The Watch-Negative > Watch-Neutral contrast served as a validation contrast for successful emotion induction, and showed increased activation of core affective processing regions such as amygdala and insula, in addition to widespread activation of regions associated with both cognitive and perceptual components of affect.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Compassion was associated with significantly higher positive affect than Reappraisal.
“Importantly, direct comparison of Compassion and Reappraisal revealed that Compassion was associated with significantly higher positive affect [m ¼ 50.29,SE ¼ 13.73), t( 882”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The Reappraisal > Watch-Negative contrast revealed a pattern of results closely resembling previous work, including fronto-parietal activation and deactivation of amygdala.
“This revealed a pattern of results closely resembling previous work (e.g.Goldin et al., 2008;Buhle et al., 2014), including fronto-parietal activation and deactivation of amygdala (Supplementary Figure S1).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Goldin et al., 2008 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Buhle et al., 2014
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingown data
For amygdala, only a main effect of Condition was observed.
“For the amygdala, only a main effect of Condition was observed [F(1, 312) ¼ 5.84, P < 0.05].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
This network was shown to be active prior to stimulus presentation.
“This network was shown to be active prior to stimulus presentation, suggesting that the regulatory mechanism of Compassion is the stimulus-independent endogenous generation of positive affect.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Findingown data
Compassion was associated with overall higher amygdala activity than Reappraisal.
“Furthermore, Compassion was associated with overall higher amygdala activity than Reappraisal”
- Also stated in: § CONCLUSION · plain
“overall lower signal in the amygdala for Reappraisal than Compassion [t(312) ¼ À2.42, P ¼ < 0.05]”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § CONCLUSION · plain
- Findingown data
Compassion increased positive affect relative to Watch-Neutral, Watch-Negative, and Reappraisal.
“On the subjective level, we found that Compassion was associated with increased positive affect relative to Watch-Neutral, Watch-Negative and Reappraisal.”
- Also stated in: § CONCLUSION · plain
“Compassion was associated with significantly higher positive affect than all other conditions”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § CONCLUSION · plain
- Findingown data
For the Compassion condition, there was a main effect of Condition in both VS/NAC and amygdala ROIs.
“For the Compassion condition, these analyses revealed a main effect of Condition in both VS/NAC [F(1, 312) ¼ 10.52, P < 0.001] and amygdala [F(1, 312) ¼ 4.50, P < 0.05] ROIs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingcitation
Reappraisal was characterized by activation of a fronto-parietal network including ventral and dorsal PFC, dACC, and TPJ/SMG.
“in line with previous work (Buhle et al., 2014), Reappraisal was characterized by activation of a fronto-parietal network, including ventral and dorsal PFC, dACC and TPJ/SMG”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Buhle et al., 2014
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingown data
The VS/NACC modulation was apparent prior to stimulus presentation.
“Critically, this modulation was apparent prior stimulus presentation”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Compassion and Reappraisal are differentiable in terms of their modulatory effects on the neural correlates of subjective positive (VS/NAC) and negative (amygdala) affect.
“In summary, these results show that Compassion and Reappraisal are differentiable in terms of their modulatory effects on the neural correlates of subjective positive (VS/NAC) and negative (amygdala) affect.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Compassion specifically increased activation in bilateral mid-insula.
“Additionally, Compassion was shown to specifically increase activation in bilateral mid-insula”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Reappraisal was associated with significantly higher positive affect than the Watch-Negative condition.
“while Reappraisal was associated with significantly higher positive affect than the Watch-Negative condition.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Compassion, relative to both passive-viewing and Reappraisal, increased activation in regions involved in affiliation, positive affect and reward processing including ventral striatum and medial orbitfrontal cortex.
“Imaging results showed that Compassion, relative to both passive-viewing and Reappraisal increased activation in regions involved in affiliation, positive affect and reward processing including ventral striatum and medial orbitfrontal cortex.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Compassion had a small but significant regulatory effect on subjectively experienced negative affect.
“However, unlike these studies, we found that Compassion had a small but significant regulatory effect on subjectively experienced negative affect.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Compassion, relative to Watch-Negative and Reappraisal, increased activation in subcortical structures (VS/NACC, globus pallidus) and midline cortical structures (vmPFC, rgACC, pgACC).
“Mirroring these behavioral effects, our fMRI analyses revealed that Compassion, relative to both Watch-Negative and Reappraisal, was associated with increased activation in subcortical structures associated with positive affect, such as VS/NACC and globus pallidus as well as midline cortical structures such as vmPFC, rgACC and pgACC (Figures 2 and 3).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Compassion showed increased activation of VS/NACC compared to both Reappraisal and passive-viewing.
“Compassion showed evidence for increased activation of VS/NACC compared to both Reappraisal and passive-viewing.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Short-term training of loving-kindness and compassion is associated with increases in empathy.
“Behavioral research has shown that short-term training of loving-kindness and compassion is associated with increases in daily positive affect (Kok et al., 2013), prosocial behavior (Leiberg et al., 2011;Weng et al., 2013), resilience (Fredrickson et al., 2008) and empathy (Mascaro et al., 2013).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Mascaro et al., 2013 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Short-term training of loving-kindness and compassion is associated with increases in prosocial behavior.
“Behavioral research has shown that short-term training of loving-kindness and compassion is associated with increases in daily positive affect (Kok et al., 2013), prosocial behavior (Leiberg et al., 2011;Weng et al., 2013), resilience (Fredrickson et al., 2008) and empathy (Mascaro et al., 2013).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Premisecitation
Reappraisal is consistently associated with activation of regions involved in selective attention, conflict monitoring and cognitive control, including dorsal anterior cingulate, ventrolateral prefrontal cortex, dorsolateral PFC and supramarginal gyrus/temporoparietal junction.
“In contrast, Reappraisal has consistently been associated with activation of regions involved in selective attention, conflict monitoring and cognitive control, including dorsal anterior cingulate (dACC), ventrolateral prefrontal cortex (vlPFC), dorsolateral PFC (dlPFC) and supramarginal gyrus/temporoparietal junction (SMG/TPJ) (Ochsner et al., 2012;Buhle et al., 2014).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Ochsner et al., 2012 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Buhle et al., 2014
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Short-term training of loving-kindness and compassion is associated with increases in resilience.
“Behavioral research has shown that short-term training of loving-kindness and compassion is associated with increases in daily positive affect (Kok et al., 2013), prosocial behavior (Leiberg et al., 2011;Weng et al., 2013), resilience (Fredrickson et al., 2008) and empathy (Mascaro et al., 2013).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Fredrickson et al., 2008 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Increases in positive affect through Compassion-training are paralleled by an increase in brain regions associated with reward and affiliation, such as the ventral striatum including nucleus accumbens and medial orbitofrontal cortex, perigenual anterior cingulate and mid-insular cortices.
“Increases in positive affect through Compassion-training have been shown to be paralleled by an increase in brain regions associated with reward and affiliation, such as the ventral striatum (VS) including nucleus accumbens (NACC) and medial orbitofrontal cortex (mOFC), perigenual anterior cingulate (pgACC) and mid-insular cortices (Klimecki et al., 2013a,b).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Klimecki et al., 2013a
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Klimecki et al., 2013b
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Prolonged exposure to suffering can have deleterious mental health effects.
“Prolonged exposure to suffering can therefore have deleterious mental health effects.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Shanafelt et al., 2012 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Adriaenssens et al., 2014
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Short-term training of loving-kindness and compassion is associated with increases in daily positive affect.
“Behavioral research has shown that short-term training of loving-kindness and compassion is associated with increases in daily positive affect (Kok et al., 2013), prosocial behavior (Leiberg et al., 2011;Weng et al., 2013), resilience (Fredrickson et al., 2008) and empathy (Mascaro et al., 2013).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kok et al., 2013 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Training is needed in order to generate loving-kindness and compassion when confronted with others' suffering.
“From previous work (Klimecki et al., 2013a,b) we know that the default response pattern to such stimuli is negative affect, presumably stemming from empathic distress reactions (Condon and Feldman Barrett, 2013), and that training is needed in order to generate loving-kindness and compassion when confronted with others' suffering.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Klimecki et al., 2013a
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Klimecki et al., 2013b
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Compassion training alters the emotional experience of the individual when confronted with the suffering of others, by specifically increasing positive affect related to experiences of warmth and concern.
“Compassion training has been shown to alter the emotional experience of the individual when confronted with the suffering of others, by specifically increasing positive affect related to experiences of warmth and concern (Klimecki et al., 2013a,b).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Klimecki et al., 2013a
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Klimecki et al., 2013b
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
Reappraisal might not be the optimal strategy in contexts where an inter-individual emotional connection is required.
“Thus, Reappraisal might not be the optimal strategy in contexts where an inter-individual emotional connection is required.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Exposure to others' pain elicits negative affective responses on both an experiential and physiological level.
“Research has demonstrated that exposure to others' pain elicits negative affective responses on both an experiential and physiological level (Lamm et al., 2011).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Lamm et al., 2011 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Reappraisal can lead to decreased concern and willingness to help, especially when multiple individuals are suffering and when helping is costly.
“Cameron and Payne (2011) demonstrated that Reappraisal can lead to decreased concern and willingness to help, especially when multiple individuals are suffering, and when helping is costly.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Cameron and Payne (2011)
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationown data
The underlying mechanism of Compassion-based emotion regulation is the volitional and stimulus-independent engagement of neural systems supporting endogenous generation of positive affect.
“Overall, these findings are in line with a view that the underlying mechanism of Compassion-based emotion regulation is the volitional and stimulus-independent engagement of neural systems supporting the endogenous generation of positive affect.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The regulatory mechanism of Compassion is the stimulus-independent endogenous generation of positive affect.
“This network was shown to be active prior to stimulus presentation, suggesting that the regulatory mechanism of Compassion is the stimulus-independent endogenous generation of positive affect.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The generalizability of our findings, especially regarding relative efficacy of Reappraisal and Compassion, is limited by the fact that our subjects had extensive experience in generating Compassion.
“Although the generalizability of our findings, especially with regards to the relative efficacy of Reappraisal and Compassion, is limited by the fact that our subjects had extensive experience in generating Compassion”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation
Employment of Compassion as a regulation strategy could avoid the decreased sensitivity and empathy reported when employing cognitive emotion regulation strategies to cope with others' suffering.
“Thus, employment of Compassion as a regulation strategy could avoid of the decreased sensitivity and empathy reported when employing cognitive emotion regulation strategies to cope with others' suffering (Cameron and Payne, 2011).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Cameron and Payne, 2011
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationown data
This modulation is consistent with Compassion involving endogenous generation of positive affect in a stimulus-independent fashion.
“consistent with Compassion involving the endogenous generation of positive affect in a stimulus-independent fashion.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Compassion to a lesser degree modulated the primary affective processing of the negative stimulus material.
“suggesting that Compassion to a lesser degree modulated the primary affective processing of the negative stimulus material.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- May combine two claims. 29
- The quote only partly states this claim. 3
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 19
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataBoth Compassion and Reappraisal decreased negative and increased positive affect relative to the Negative-Watch condition, demonstrating their efficacy at regulating affective states.
“Further comparisons revealed that both Compassion and Reappraisal decreased negative [Compassion: (m ¼ À56.13, SE ¼ 10.37), t(882) ¼ À5.41, P < 0.001); Reappraisal: (m ¼ À54.74, SE ¼ 9.71), t(882) ¼ À5.64, P < 0.001] and increased positive affect [Compassion: (m ¼ 101, SE ¼ 11,89), t(882) ¼ 8.50, P < 0.001; Reappraisal: m ¼ À97.82, SE ¼ 10.37), t(882) ¼ À9.43, P < 0.001] relative to the Negative-W”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataDuring the implementation phase, Compassion relative to Watch-Negative showed substantial activations in medial PFC including vmPFC and mOFC, genual ACC and SMA, left dorsolateral and ventrolateral prefrontal regions, SMG/TPJ, posterior cingulate, temporal gyri, cerebellum, and subcortical VS including NACC, globus pallidus, caudate, putamen, hypothalamus and right amygdala.
“In the Implementation phase (Figure 2B), substantial activations were observed in medial PFC, including vmPFC and mOFC, as well as genual ACC and SMA.Left dorsolateral and ventrolateral prefrontal activations were again observed, including middle and superior frontal gyrii (SFG), as well as the orbital portion of the triangular and orbital IFG.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataPositive and negative emotion ratings showed a significant main effect of Condition for both Positive [F(3, 882) = 26.66, P < 0.001] and Negative [F(3, 882) = 176.10, P < 0.001] ratings.
“This revealed a significant main effect of Condition for both Positive [F(3, 882) ¼ 26.66, P < 0.001] and Negative [F(3, 882) ¼ 176.10,P < 0.001] ratings.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe Negative-Watch condition elicited significantly more negative and significantly less positive affect than the Neutral-Watch condition, demonstrating successful emotion induction.
“These revealed that the Negative-Watch condition elicited significantly more negative [m ¼ 191.19,SE ¼ 8.47), t(882) ¼ 22.58, P < 0.001] and significantly less positive [m ¼ À54.74, SE ¼ 9.71, t(882) ¼ À5.64, P < 0.001] affect than the Neutral-Watch condition, demonstrating successful emotion induction.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimThe quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataDuring the preparation phase, Compassion relative to Watch-Negative showed activations in lateral frontal regions, parietal lobules, medial frontopolar/mOFC/vmPFC, pgACC/sgACC, PCC, thalamus, hypothalamus, VS, and cerebellum.
“In the preparation phase (Figure 2A), activations were observed laterally in frontal regions, including middle frontal gyrus (MFG) and triangular/orbital junction of the inferior frontal gyrus (IFG), sup- plementary motor area (SMA), as well as superior and inferor parietal lobules.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn the preparation phase, Compassion relative to Reappraisal showed higher activation primarily in medial frontal regions including vmPFC/gyrus rectus, pgACC, sgACC, dorsal ACC/SMA, precuneus, bilateral STG and right IFG/operculum ranging into mid-insula; Reappraisal showed higher activation in posterior and polar MTG, posterior cingulate/precuneus and cerebellum.
“In the Preparation phase (Figure 3A), higher activation was found for the Compassion condition primarily in medial frontal regions, including vmPFC/gyrus rectus, pgACC, sgACC, dorsal ACC/SMA, precuneus.Additional activations were observed in bilateral superior temporal gyrus (STG) and right IFG/operculum ranging into mid-insula.In contrast, higher activation for the Reappraisal condition was found”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn the Compassion condition, VS/NAC signal was higher and amygdala signal was lower relative to the Watch-Negative condition.
“Follow-up t-tests showed that this effect consisted of higher signal in the VS/NAC [t(312) ¼ 3.32, P ¼ < 0.001] and lower signal [t(342) ¼ À2.17, P ¼ < 0.05] in the amygdala ROIs relative to the Watch-Negative condition.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataCompassion relied primarily on activation of medial and subcortical systems, with strongest differentiation in mOFC and VS/NACC.
“Contrary to this, Compassion was shown to rely primarily on activation of the aforementioned medial and subcortical systems, with the strongest differentiation observable in mOFC and VS/NACC (Figure 3).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataCompassion increased positive affect above Watch-Neutral baseline, whereas Reappraisal did not.
“Importantly, unlike Reappraisal, Compassion occasioned an increase of positive affect relative to baseline levels of positivity (Watch-Neutral).”
- Also stated in: § CONCLUSION · plain
“only Compassion increased positive affect above the Watch-Neutral condition [Compassion: (m ¼ 46.28, SE ¼ 11.89), t(882) ¼ 3.89, P < 0.001; Reappraisal: (m ¼ À4.01, SE ¼ 11.89), t(882) ¼ À0.34, P > 0.1]”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Also stated in: § CONCLUSION · plain
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataWhile both Compassion and Reappraisal decreased activation of amygdala relative to Watch-Negative, only Compassion increased activation of VS/NAC.
“Thus, while both Compassion and Reappraisal was shown to decrease activation of amygdala relative to Watch-Negative, only Compassion was shown to increase activation of VS/ NAC.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataBoth Compassion and Reappraisal effectively, but differentially regulated experienced affect, with Compassion primarily increasing positive and Reappraisal primarily decreasing negative affect.
“Both strategies effectively, but differentially regulated experienced affect, with Compassion primarily increasing positive and Reappraisal primarily decreasing negative affect.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataIn the implementation phase, Compassion relative to Reappraisal showed increased activation in medial PFC including vmPFC, mOFC, sgACC, pgACC, frontopolar cortex, bilateral SMA and mid-cingulate, bilateral operculum/mid-insula, STG, precuneus, right fusiform gyrus, and subcortically NACC/VS, bilateral amygdala, hypothalamus, caudate, globus pallidus, putamen, right hippocampus and ventral anterior
“For the Implementation phase (Figure 3B), increased activation was found for the Compassion condition in medial PFC, including vmPFC, mOFC, sgACC, pgACC, frontopolar cortex, bilateral SMA and mid-cingulate.Laterally, activations were observed in bilateral operculum/mid-insula, STG, precuneus and right fusiform gyrus.Subcortically, activations were observed in NACC/VS, bilateral amygdala,”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataBoth Compassion and Reappraisal decreased negative affect, with Reappraisal decreasing it significantly more.
“Both compassion and Reappraisal decreased negative affect, though Reappraisal did so significantly more.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataFor VS/NAC, there was a main effect of Condition and a Condition*Period interaction effect.
“For the VS/NAC, this revealed a main effect of Condition, [F(1, 312) ¼ 11.16, P < 0.001] as well as a Condition* Period interaction effect [F(1, 312) ¼ 3.96, P < 0.05].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningAll meditators had participated in at least one 3-year full-time retreat at the same institution, in which they practiced these techniques and underwent instruction by the same teachers, ensuring homogenous and expert implementation of Compassion.
“Further, all meditators had participated in at least one 3-year full-time retreat at the same institution, in which they practiced these techniques and underwent instruction by the same teachers.This ensured homogenous and expert implementation of Compassion allowing us to describe the workings of the technique at its optimum.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductreasoningPositive Reappraisal was chosen to ensure comparability with Compassion in terms of regulatory goal.
“We chose to use positive Reappraisal to ensure comparability of with Compassion in terms of regulatory goal.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationTrait use of Reappraisal is a predictor of psychological well-being and resilience.
“Furthermore, trait use of Reappraisal is a predictor of psychological well-being and resilience (McRae et al., 2012b;Min et al., 2013).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites McRae et al., 2012b
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Min et al., 2013 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe default response pattern to stimuli depicting individuals in distress is negative affect, presumably stemming from empathic distress reactions.
“From previous work (Klimecki et al., 2013a,b) we know that the default response pattern to such stimuli is negative affect, presumably stemming from empathic distress reactions (Condon and Feldman Barrett, 2013), and that training is needed in order to generate loving-kindness and compassion when confronted with others' suffering.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Condon and Feldman Barrett, 2013
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningCompassion is an appropriate regulation strategy in contexts where emotional connection is important since it does not involve the alteration of one's emotional reactions to stressors directly, but rather the countergeneration of a positive affective state.
“These qualities suggest the appropriateness of Compassion as a regulation strategy in contexts where emotional connection is important since it does not involve the alteration of ones emotional reactions to stressors directly, but rather the countergeneration of a positive affective state.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe socio-affective video task has previously been successfully used in Compassion research and is optimized to elicit extended negative affect of a social nature.
“This task has previously been successfully used in previous Compassion research and is optimized to elicit extended negative affect of a social nature.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Klimecki et al., 2014 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductreasoningA finite impulse response deconvolution approach was used to ensure robustness of the analyses in the face of potential differences in temporal dynamics of the conditions.
“To ensure robustness of the analyses in the face of potential differences in temporal dynamics of the conditions, a finite impulse response deconvolution approach was used.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe neural implementation of Compassion and Reappraisal appears to mirror their conceptual differences, in that Compassion involves the volitional endogenous generation of an emotional and motivational state rather than alteration of exogenously triggered states through cognitive control and self-regulation, as seen in Reappraisal.
“As such, the neural implementation of Compassion and Reappraisal appears to mirror their conceptual differences, in that Compassion involves the volitional endogenous generation of an emotional and motivational state rather than alteration of exogenously triggered states through cognitive control and self-regulation, as seen in Reappraisal.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationReappraisal is effective across a wide range of different emotional stimuli and contexts.
“This strategy, most frequently called Reappraisal, has been shown to be effective across a wide range of different emotional stimuli and contexts (Gross, 2014).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Gross, 2014
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataMeditation experience was estimated at a cumulative total of 40,000 ± 9,000 h (range 10,000-62,000 h).
“Meditation experience was assessed through semi-structured interviews, showing an estimated cumulative total of 40 000 Æ 9000 h of meditation (range ¼ 10 000-62 000 h).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationCompassion-meditation involves the initial generation of an emotional state of loving-kindness through directed imagery emphasizing positive emotional qualities of warmth, care and other-related concern, which can then be applied to the suffering of others, turning the initial state of loving-kindness into one of compassion.
“Concretely, Compassionmeditation involves the initial generation of an emotional state of loving-kindness through directed imagery emphasizing positive emotional qualities of warmth, care and other-related concern.Once this emotional state is achieved it can then be applied to the suffering of others, turning the initial state of loving-kindness into one of compassion (Singer and Klimecki, 2014).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Singer and Klimecki, 2014 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductcitationThe stimuli were short film clips (10-12 s; 40 negative and 20 neutral) taken from the previously validated SoVT stimulus set.
“The stimuli were short film clips (10-12 s in length; 40 negative and 20 neutral stimuli) taken from the previously validated SoVT stimulus set (for details see Klimecki et al., 2013a).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Klimecki et al., 2013a
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningAs controlled breathing is a key component of meditation, potential respiratory artifacts and confounds were accounted for by despiking the data and removing the run-specific global signal for each voxel.
“As controlled breathing is a key component of meditation, we accounted for potential respiratory artifacts and confounds by despiking the data using the ArtRepair toolbox (version 4, http:// cibsr.stanford.edu/tools/human-brain-project/artrepair-software.html) and removing the run-specific global signal for each voxel (Macey et al., 2004) in line with previous work (e.g.Farb et al., 2013).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductown dataMultiple comparisons were controlled for using cluster-level FWE correction at < 0.05 (T > 3.36, P = 0.001, k > 30) as determined by AFNI's AlphaSim Monte Carlo simulation method.
“Multiple comparisons were controlled for using cluster-level FWE correction at < 0.05 (T > 3.36, P ¼ 0.001, k > 30) as determined by AFNI's AlphaSim Monte Carlo simulation method.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenStimulus and session order were counterbalanced across subjects.
“Stimulus and session order were counterbalanced across subjects.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningReappraisal involves discounting negative information as it is perceived and substituting a more positive interpretation.
“One explanation for this is that Reappraisal involves discounting negative information as it is perceived, and substituting a more positive interpretation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationTraining in Compassion-meditation aims at enabling the individual to volitionally generate states of compassion, allowing them to encounter the suffering of others while maintaining a positive emotional state of benevolence, warmth and concern and a motivation to help.
“Training in Compassion-meditation aims at enabling the individual to volitionally generate states of compassion, allowing them to encounter the suffering of others while maintaining a positive emotional state of benevolence, warmth and concern and a motivation to help (Lutz et al., 2008;Klimecki et al., 2013a;Kok et al., 2013).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningTo ensure homogeneity in strategy execution, subjects were asked to describe each strategy in their own words prior to the start of training and to describe in detail exactly how they implemented the strategy after each practice trial, with misunderstandings corrected when apparent.
“To ensure homogeneity in strategy execution, subjects were asked to describe each strategy in their own words prior to the start of training and to describe in detail exactly how they implemented the strategy after each practice trial, with misunderstandings corrected when apparent.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationThe fronto-parietal network regions (ventral/dorsal PFC, dACC, TPJ/SMG) are known to be associated with cognitive control, attention regulation, and working memory.
“regions known to be associated with cognitive control, attention regulation and working memory (Ochsner et al., 2012).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ochsner et al., 2012 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe different activation patterns reflect that Reappraisal involves cognitive control to modulate affective influences, whereas Compassion involves generation of positive affect without altering processing of negative stimuli.
“These different activation patterns appear to reflect the conceptual difference between Reappraisal and Compassion: Reappraisal involves the employment of cognitive control to modulate affective influences, whereas Compassion involves the generation of positive affect, without altering the processing of negative stimuli.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataCompassion is an effective regulation strategy and a key mechanism is engagement of neural systems associated with positive affect.
“Overall, these results are consistent with previous findings (Klimecki et al., 2013a,b), demonstrating that Compassion is an effective regulation strategy and that a key mechanism underlying these regulatory effects is the engagement of neural systems associated with positive affect.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Klimecki et al., 2013a,b
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductnone givenAll P-values were Bonferroni corrected.
“All P-values Bonferroni corrected.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataCompassion can be employed as an effective emotion regulation strategy outside of its traditional meditative context, and both experientially and neurally it is associated with endogenous generation of positive affect.
“In this study, we showed that Compassion can be employed as an effective emotion regulation strategy outside of its traditional meditative context, and that both experientially and neurally, it is associated with the endogenous generation of positive affect.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationUsing Compassion as a coping strategy in helping professions would have an additional beneficial effect: it would increase resilience and increase willingness to assist individuals in need.
“suggesting an additional beneficial effect if used as coping strategy in helping professions as it would not only increase resilience but also increase their willingness to assist individuals in need.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningCompassion might be an effective means to promote resilience to others' suffering also in the general population while promoting emotional connectedness and pro-sociality.
“This suggests that Compassion might be an effective means to promote resilience to others' suffering also in the general population while at the same time promoting emotional connectedness and pro-sociality.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningCompassion's capacity to be employed independently of specific stimuli and its mechanism not involving attenuation/alteration of negative emotional responses potentially affords it unique advantages as an emotion regulation strategy.
“The capacity to be employed independently of specific stimuli and an underlying mechanism not involving attenuation or alteration of negative emotional responses potentially affords Compassion some unique advantages as an emotion regulation strategy.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationBilateral mid-insula is previously associated with affiliative types of positive affect, such as maternal love.
“a region previously associated with specifically affiliative types of positive affect, such as maternal love (Bartels and Zeki, 2004).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Bartels and Zeki, 2004 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn the context of others' suffering, Compassion affords maintenance of an empathic connection while counteracting empathic distress.
“In the context of others' suffering, Compassion affords maintenance of an empathic connection while counteracting empathic distress (Singer and Klimecki, 2014).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Singer and Klimecki, 2014 source
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductown dataAll results were thresholded at FWEc < 0.05 as determined by AFNI's AlphaSim (P < 0.001, extent threshold = 30 voxels).
“All results thresholded at FWEc < 0.05 as determined by AFNI's AlphaSim (P < 0.001, extent threshold ¼ 30 voxels).”
- Also stated in: § CONCLUSION · plain
“All results thresholded at FWEc < 0.05 as determined by AFNI's AlphaSim (P < 0.001, extent threshold ¼ 30 voxels).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Also stated in: § CONCLUSION · plain
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationcitationOur findings are largely consistent with earlier work on short-term effects of Compassion training by Klimecki et al. (2013a,b).
“Our findings are largely consistent with earlier work on short-term effects of Compassion training by Klimecki et al. (2013a,b).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Klimecki et al., 2013a,b
Not checked in the free run.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
On a neural level, compassion was accompanied by activations in reward and positive emotion related networks.
“On a neural level, compassion was accompanied by activations in reward and positive emotion related networks [14 ].”
From On the interaction of social affect and cognition: empathy, compassion and theory of mind (2018) · cites this paper as [14]
Compassion can be viewed as an emotion-regulation strategy that buffers negative affect through the active generation of positive affect relying on reward-related and affiliation-related brain circuitries.
“Compassion can thus be viewed as an emotionregulation strategy that buffers negative affect through the active generation of positive affect relying on rewardrelated and affiliation-related brain circuitries.”
From On the interaction of social affect and cognition: empathy, compassion and theory of mind (2018) · cites this paper as [14]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Significant VS/NAC difference is assigned to the wrong period
MajorThe text says Compassion exceeded Reappraisal specifically during Implementation, but the accompanying tests report a significant difference during Preparation and a nonsignificant difference during Implementation.
“higher signal in the VS/NAC for Compassion relative to Reappraisal specifically during the Implementation period”
“[Preparation: t(134) ¼ 3.79, P ¼ < 0.0001; Implementation: t(164) ¼0.97, P ¼ > 0.1]”
Reported Reappraisal positive-affect contrast has the wrong value and direction
MajorReappraisal is reported as 4.01 points below Watch-Neutral, while Watch-Negative is 54.74 points below Watch-Neutral. Those values put Reappraisal 50.73 points above Watch-Negative, not 97.82 points below it.
Reported -97.82 · recomputed 50.73
“Reappraisal: m ¼ À97.82, SE ¼ 10.37), t(882) ¼ À9.43, P < 0.001] relative to the Negative-Watch condition”
Cites
A fast diffeomorphic image registration algorithm
Ashburner, J. (2007) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.07.007 · Cited by 8,122 · see citing works
A new SPM toolbox for combining probabilistic cytoarchitectonic maps and functional imaging data
Eickhoff, S. B., Stephan, K. E., Mohlberg, H., Grefkes, C., Fink, G. R., Amunts, K., & Zilles, K. (2005) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.12.034 · Cited by 4,033 · see citing works
Shanafelt, T. D., Boone, S., Tan, L., Dyrbye, L. N., Sotile, W., Satele, D., West, C. P., Sloan, J., & Oreskovich, M. R. (2012) · Archives of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/archinternmed.2012.3199 · Cited by 3,439 · see citing works
Fredrickson, B. L., Cohn, M. A., Coffey, K. A., Pek, J., & Finkel, S. M. (2008) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0013262 · Cited by 2,365 · see citing works
Compassion: an evolutionary analysis and empirical review
Goetz, J. L., Keltner, D., & Simon-Thomas, E. (2010) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0018807 · Cited by 2,200 · see citing works
Lamm, C., Decety, J., & Singer, T. (2011) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.10.014 · Cited by 2,016 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Research has demonstrated that exposure to others’ pain elicits negative affective responses on both an experiential and physiological level (Lamm et al., 2011).”
BackgroundSelf-citationCognitive Reappraisal of Emotion: A Meta-Analysis of Human Neuroimaging Studies
Buhle, J. T., Silvers, J. A., Wager, T. D., Lopez, R., Onyemekwu, C., Kober, H., Weber, J., & Ochsner, K. N. (2014) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bht154 · Cited by 1,896 · see citing works
The Neural Bases of Emotion Regulation: Reappraisal and Suppression of Negative Emotion
Goldin, P. R., McRae, K., Ramel, W., & Gross, J. J. (2008) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2007.05.031 · Cited by 1,886 · see citing works
Ochsner, K. N., Silvers, J. A., & Buhle, J. T. (2012) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.2012.06751.x · Cited by 1,879 · see citing works
Prefrontal-Subcortical Pathways Mediating Successful Emotion Regulation
Wager, T. D., Davidson, M. L., Hughes, B. L., Lindquist, M. A., & Ochsner, K. N. (2008) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2008.09.006 · Cited by 1,761 · cited 1× · see citing works
“For Reappraisal, subjects were asked to reinterpret the clips by thinking about what was occurring in a way in which the narrative ended more positive than was immediately apparent, i.e. to employ a Reappraisal technique with positive emphasis (cf. Wager et al., 2008).”
MethodBehavioral Theories and the Neurophysiology of Reward
Schultz, W. (2006) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070229 · Cited by 1,637 · see citing works
The neural correlates of maternal and romantic love
Bartels, A., & Zeki, S. (2004) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.11.003 · Cited by 1,448 · cited 3× · see citing works
“Additionally, Compassion was shown to specifically increase activation in bilateral mid-insula, a region previously associated with specifically affiliative types of positive affect, such as maternal love (Bartels and Zeki, 2004).”
BackgroundSinger, T., & Klimecki, O. M. (2014) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2014.06.054 · Cited by 1,254 · see citing works
Self-citationGarland, E. L., Fredrickson, B., Kring, A. M., Johnson, D. P., Meyer, P. S., & Penn, D. L. (2010) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2010.03.002 · Cited by 1,035 · see citing works
Lutz, A., Brefczynski-Lewis, J., Johnstone, T., & Davidson, R. J. (2008) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0001897 · Cited by 942 · see citing works
Adriaenssens, J., Gucht, V. D., & Stan Maes, A. (2014) · International Journal of Nursing Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2014.11.004 · Cited by 792 · see citing works
Adult attachment predicts maternal brain and oxytocin response to infant cues.
Strathearn, L., Fonagy, P., Amico, J., & Montague, P. R. (2009) · Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1038/npp.2009.103 · Cited by 773 · see citing works
Duvernoy, H. M. (1999) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-7091-6792-2 · Cited by 759 · see citing works
Kok, B. E., Coffey, K. A., Cohn, M. A., Catalino, L. I., Vacharkulksemsuk, T., Algoe, S. B., Brantley, M., & Fredrickson, B. L. (2013) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797612470827 · Cited by 755 · see citing works
Differential pattern of functional brain plasticity after compassion and empathy training
Klimecki, O. M., Leiberg, S., Ricard, M., & Singer, T. (2014) · Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience · doi:10.1093/scan/nst060 · Cited by 676 · see citing works
Self-citationFunctional Neural Plasticity and Associated Changes in Positive Affect After Compassion Training
Klimecki, O. M., Leiberg, S., Lamm, C., & Singer, T. (2013) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhs142 · Cited by 634 · see citing works
Self-citationCompassion training alters altruism and neural responses to suffering.
Weng, H. Y., Fox, A. S., Shackman, A. J., Stodola, D. E., Caldwell, J. Z. K., Olson, M. C., Rogers, G. M., & Davidson, R. J. (2013) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797612469537 · Cited by 602 · see citing works
Duvernoy, H. M., Cattin, F., & Risold, P. (2013) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-33603-4 · Cited by 567 · see citing works
Mindfulness meditation training alters cortical representations of interoceptive attention
Farb, N. A. S., Segal, Z. V., & Anderson, A. K. (2013) · Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience · doi:10.1093/scan/nss066 · Cited by 566 · see citing works
Neuroscience of affect: brain mechanisms of pleasure and displeasure
Berridge, K. C., & Kringelbach, M. L. (2013) · Current Opinion in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.conb.2013.01.017 · Cited by 532 · see citing works
Neural computations associated with goal-directed choice
Rangel, A., & Hare, T. (2010) · Current Opinion in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.conb.2010.03.001 · Cited by 532 · see citing works
Towards a functional neuroanatomy of pleasure and happiness
Kringelbach, M. L., & Berridge, K. C. (2009) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2009.08.006 · Cited by 528 · see citing works
Unpacking cognitive reappraisal: Goals, tactics, and outcomes.
Kateri Mcrae, A., Ciesielski, B. G., & Gross, J. J. (2011) · Emotion · doi:10.1037/a0026351 · Cited by 515 · see citing works
Weiskopf, N., Hutton, C., Josephs, O., & Deichmann, R. (2006) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.07.029 · Cited by 488 · see citing works
McRae, K., Jacobs, S. E., Ray, R. D., John, O. P., & Gross, J. J. (2012) · Journal of Research in Personality · doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2011.10.003 · Cited by 486 · see citing works
Escaping affect: how motivated emotion regulation creates insensitivity to mass suffering.
Cameron, C. D., & Payne, B. K. (2011) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0021643 · Cited by 477 · see citing works
Short-term compassion training increases prosocial behavior in a newly developed prosocial game
Leiberg, S., Klimecki, O., & Singer, T. (2011) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0017798 · Cited by 442 · cited 6× · see citing works
“…is limited by the fact that our subjects had extensive experience in generating Compassion, recent work demonstrates that it is possible to elicit similar neural and behavioral effects to what we observe here with short-term training (Leiberg et al., 2011; Klimecki et al., 2014; Weng et al., 2013).”
BackgroundResultInfluentialSelf-citationIs Timing Everything? Temporal Considerations in Emotion Regulation
Sheppes, G., & Gross, J. (2011) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/1088868310395778 · Cited by 429 · see citing works
A method for removal of global effects from fMRI time series
Macey, P. M., Macey, K. E., Kumar, R., & Harper, R. M. (2004) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.12.042 · Cited by 407 · see citing works
Duvernoy’s Atlas of the Human Brain Stem and Cerebellum
Naidich, T. P., Duvernoy, H. M., Delman, B. N., Sorensen, A. G., Kollias, S. S., & Haacke, E. M. (2009) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-211-73971-6 · Cited by 313 · see citing works
Issues with threshold masking in voxel-based morphometry of atrophied brains
Ridgway, G. R., Omar, R., Sebastien Ourselin, A., Hill, D., Warren, J. D., & Fox, N. C. (2008) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.08.045 · Cited by 295 · see citing works
Individual Attachment Style Modulates Human Amygdala and Striatum Activation during Social Appraisal
Vrtička, P., Andersson, F., Grandjean, D., Sander, D., & Vuilleumier, P. (2008) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0002868 · Cited by 260 · see citing works
Min, J.-A., Yu, J. J., Lee, C.-U., & Chae, J.-H. (2013) · Comprehensive Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.comppsych.2013.05.008 · Cited by 253 · see citing works
Compassion meditation enhances empathic accuracy and related neural activity
Mascaro, J. S., Rilling, J. K., Tenzin Negi, L., & Raison, C. L. (2013) · Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience · doi:10.1093/scan/nss095 · Cited by 223 · see citing works
Conceptualizing and experiencing compassion.
Condon, P., & Barrett, L. F. (2013) · Emotion · doi:10.1037/a0033747 · Cited by 127 · see citing works
Subjective neuronal coding of reward: temporal value discounting and risk
Schultz, W. (2010) · European Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1111/j.1460-9568.2010.07282.x · Cited by 74 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Gross, 2014, Emotion regulation: conceptual foundations and empirical foundations, 3
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Mindfulness and Behavior Change
Schuman-Olivier, Z., Trombka, M., Lovas, D. A., Brewer, J. A., Vago, D. R., Gawande, R., Dunne, J. P., Lazar, S. W., Loucks, E. B., & Fulwiler, C. (2020) · Harvard Review of Psychiatry · doi:10.1097/hrp.0000000000000277 · Cited by 435 · see citing works
Kanske, P., Böckler, A., Trautwein, F.-M., & Singer, T. (2015) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.07.082 · Cited by 421 · see citing works
Self-citationOn the interaction of social affect and cognition: empathy, compassion and theory of mind
Preckel, K., Kanske, P., & Singer, T. (2018) · Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.cobeha.2017.07.010 · Cited by 348 · see citing works
Self-citationConversano, C., Ciacchini, R., Orrù, G., Di Giuseppe, M., Gemignani, A., & Poli, A. (2020) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01683 · Cited by 243 · see citing works
“As for the neurobiological studies (Hölzel et al., 2013; Taren et al., 2013, 2015; Engen and Singer, 2015), mindfulness seems to be effective at improving negative affect and, possibly, compassion fatigue, while compassion satisfaction may be related to cultivation of positive affect.”
BackgroundDifferential benefits of mental training types for attention, compassion, and theory of mind
Trautwein, F.-M., Kanske, P., Böckler, A., & Singer, T. (2020) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2019.104039 · Cited by 139 · see citing works
Engen, H. G., Bernhardt, B. C., Skottnik, L., Ricard, M., & Singer, T. (2018) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.08.024 · Cited by 83 · see citing works
Self-citationGao, Y., Hu, Y., Wang, J., Liu, C., Im, H., Jin, W., Zhu, W., Ge, W., Zhao, G., Yao, Q., et al. (2025) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2025.121029 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Godara, M., Silveira, S., Matthäus, H., Heim, C., Voelkle, M., Hecht, M., Binder, E. B., & Singer, T. (2021) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0256323 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Self-citationAssociations between empathy and negative affect: effect of emotion regulation
GUO, X., ZHENG, H., RUAN, D., HU, D., WANG, Y., WANG, Y., & Raymond, C. K. C. (2023) · Acta Psychologica Sinica · doi:10.3724/sp.j.1041.2023.00892 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Affect and motivation are critical in constructive meditation
Engen, H. G., & Singer, T. (2016) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2015.11.004 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Self-citationHildebrandt, L. K., McCall, C., & Singer, T. (2019) · Emotion · doi:10.1037/emo0000518 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Self-citationGrief, Mindfulness and Neural Predictors of Improvement in Family Dementia Caregivers
Jain, F. A., Connolly, C. G., Moore, L. C., Leuchter, A. F., Abrams, M., Ben-Yelles, R. W., Chang, S. E., Ramirez Gomez, L. A., Huey, N., Lavretsky, H., et al. (2019) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2019.00155 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
- Authors
- Engen, H. G., & Singer, T.
- Affiliations
- Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences (DE)
- Venue
- Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2015-02-19
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1291-1301
- ISSN
- 1749-5016 (ISSN-L)
- 1749-5024
- PMC
- PMC4560943
- OpenAlex
- W2101584513
- Semantic Scholar
- 95e735c61c81197e0748142a23d552f4cd89536a
- Cited by
- 175
- References
- 41
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 39 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 3
- FWCI
- 15.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- FP7 Ideas: European Research Council (205557)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Keywords
- compassion meditation, emotion regulation, cognitive reappraisal, positive affect, negative affect, compassion for others, emotional connection, ventral striatum, medial orbitofrontal cortex, reward processing, affiliation
- MeSH terms
- Affect, Brain, Emotions, Empathy, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Nerve Net, Meditation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-10.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-10.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review