The DOI matches its Crossref record; 28 of the 28 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Masterbatch-based multi-walled carbon nanotube filled polypropylene nanocomposites: Assessment of rheological and mechanical properties
Open accessAbstract
Polypropylene (PP)/multi-wall carbon nanotubes (MWNTs) nanocomposites were prepared by diluting a PP/MWNT masterbatch by melt compounding with a twin screw extruder and prepared nanocomposites were characterized for their rheological, mechanical and morphological properties in terms of MWNT loading. The rheological results showed that the materials experience a fluid–solid transition at the composition of 2 wt.%, beyond which a continuous MWNT network forms throughout the matrix and in turn promotes the reinforcement. The tensile modulus and yield stress of the nanocomposites are substantially increased relative to the neat polypropylene. Nanotube reinforcement thus enhanced the yield stress, while reducing the ductility. The same behavior is observed in flexural tests. Charpy impact resistance of the notched samples increases slightly by the addition of MWNT, while impact resistance for the un-notched samples decreases with the addition of MWNTs. Finally, optimum in mechanical properties was observed at 2 wt.% MWNTs, which is near the rheological percolation threshold. From transmission electron microscopic (TEM) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images, it was observed that nanotubes are distributed reasonably uniformly indicating a good dispersion of nanotubes in the PP matrix. These results reveal that, preparation of nanocomposites from masterbatch dilution is an excellent method to obtain well-dispersed CNTs, while limiting the handling difficulties in plastics processing industrial workshops.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Helical microtubules of graphitic carbon
Iijima, S. (1991) · Nature · doi:10.1038/354056a0 · Cited by 43,098
Exceptionally high Young's modulus observed for individual carbon nanotubes
Treacy, M. M. J., Ebbesen, T. W., & Gibson, J. M. (1996) · Nature · doi:10.1038/381678a0 · Cited by 5,428
THOSTENSON, E., LI, C., & CHOU, T. (2005) · Composites Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.compscitech.2004.11.003 · Cited by 1,734
Covalently functionalized nanotubes as nanometre- sized probes in chemistry and biology
Wong, S. S., Joselevich, E., Woolley, A. T., Cheung, C. L., & Lieber, C. M. (1998) · Nature · doi:10.1038/27873 · Cited by 1,451
Single-Walled Carbon Nanotube-Polymer Composites: Strength and Weakness
Ajayan, P. M., Schadler, L. S., Giannaris, C., & Rubio, A. (2000) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/(sici)1521-4095(200005)12:10<750::aid-adma750>3.0.co;2-6 · Cited by 1,435
Rheological behavior of multiwalled carbon nanotube/polycarbonate composites
Pötschke, P., Fornes, T. D., & Paul, D. R. (2002) · Polymer · doi:10.1016/s0032-3861(02)00151-9 · Cited by 1,243
Influence of dispersion states of carbon nanotubes on physical properties of epoxy nanocomposites
Song, Y. S., & Youn, J. R. (2005) · Carbon · doi:10.1016/j.carbon.2005.01.007 · Cited by 1,010
Crystallization and orientation studies in polypropylene/single wall carbon nanotube composite
Bhattacharyya, A. R., Sreekumar, T. V., Liu, T., Kumar, S., Ericson, L. M., Hauge, R. H., & Smalley, R. E. (2003) · Polymer · doi:10.1016/s0032-3861(03)00073-9 · Cited by 725
Meincke, O., Kaempfer, D., Weickmann, H., Friedrich, C., Vathauer, M., & Warth, H. (2004) · Polymer · doi:10.1016/j.polymer.2003.12.013 · Cited by 714
Fabrication of Carbon Multiwall Nanotube/Polymer Composites by Shear Mixing
Andrews, R. J., Jacques, D., Minot, M., & Rantell, T. D. (2002) · Macromolecular Materials and Engineering · doi:10.1002/1439-2054(20020601)287:6 · Cited by 700
Cited by
Thermal conductivity of carbon nanotubes and their polymer nanocomposites: A review
Han, Z., & Fina, A. (2011) · Progress in Polymer Science · doi:10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2010.11.004 · Cited by 2,603
Duncan, T. V. (2011) · Journal of Colloid and Interface Science · doi:10.1016/j.jcis.2011.07.017 · Cited by 2,029
Nanocomposites for food packaging applications
Azeredo, H. M. C. D. (2009) · Food Research International · doi:10.1016/j.foodres.2009.03.019 · Cited by 1,259
Nanotechnology in agro-food: From field to plate
Dasgupta, N., Ranjan, S., Mundekkad, D., Ramalingam, C., Shanker, R., & Kumar, A. (2015) · Food Research International · doi:10.1016/j.foodres.2015.01.005 · Cited by 437
Nanotechnology: An Untapped Resource for Food Packaging
Sharma, C., Dhiman, R., Rokana, N., & Panwar, H. (2017) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2017.01735 · Cited by 389
Synergy in hybrid polymer/nanocarbon composites. A review
Szeluga, U., Kumanek, B., & Trzebicka, B. (2015) · Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing · doi:10.1016/j.compositesa.2015.02.021 · Cited by 373
Thermorheologically complex self-seeded melts of propylene–ethylene copolymers
Sangroniz, L., Cavallo, D., Santamaria, A., Müller, A. J., & Alamo, R. G. (2017) · Macromolecules · doi:10.1021/acs.macromol.6b02392 · Cited by 82
Metadata
- Authors
- Prashantha, K., Soulestin, J., Lacrampe, M. F., Krawczak, P., Dupin, G., & Claes, M.
- Venue
- Composites Science and Technology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2009-09
- Volume
- 69
- Issue
- 11-12
- Pages
- 1756-1763
- ISSN
- 0266-3538 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2020735671
- Cited by
- 375
- References
- 28
- FWCI
- 8.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
