Terahertz spectroscopy to study the orientation of glass fibres in reinforced plastics
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The prediction was bad with three different direction angles because the variations in refractive index and absorption coefficient acquired in this study were significantly bigger than in the prior result due to large variations of moisture content and density.
“The reason why the prediction was bad when using three different direction angles is that the variations in the refractive index and absorption coefficient acquired in this study were significantly bigger compared to their result due to big variations of MC and density.”
From Simultaneous detection of density, moisture content and fiber direction of wood by THz time-domain spectroscopy (2020) · cites this paper as [19]
The result that β = 40° gave almost the same accuracy is consistent with the previous study which stated that accuracy was highest when the interval was 45°.
“This result is consistent with the previous study [19] which stated that the accuracy was highest when the interval was 45°.”
From Simultaneous detection of density, moisture content and fiber direction of wood by THz time-domain spectroscopy (2020) · cites this paper as [19]
THz measurements at the same spatial position with more than three differing orientation angles of THz polarization with respect to the sample edge must be performed to identify the direction angle.
“Jordens et al. [19] showed that the THz measurements at the same spatial position with more than three differing orientation angles of the THz polarization with respect to the edge of the sample must be performed to identify the direction angle.”
From Simultaneous detection of density, moisture content and fiber direction of wood by THz time-domain spectroscopy (2020) · cites this paper as [19]
Schajer and Orhan successfully predicted grain angles for hemlock and Douglas fir with standard errors of 0.9° and 2.5°, moisture content of 1.2 and 1.9%, and dry density of 0.16 and 0.30 g/cm3.
“Schajer and Orhan [19] successfully predicted the grain angles for hemlock and Douglas fir with standard errors of 0.9° and 2.5° (measured range from -90 to + 90°), MC of 1.2 and 1.9% (measured range from 7 to 28%), and dry density of 0.16 and 0.30 g/cm 3 (measured range from 0.325 to 0.625 g/cm 3 ) [20].”
From Simultaneous detection of density, moisture content and fiber direction of wood by THz time-domain spectroscopy (2020) · cites this paper as [19]
Four different direction angles were employed to predict fiber direction because prediction of fiber orientation, moisture content, and density was not stable with only three different direction angles.
“However, we employed four different direction angles to predict the fiber direction of the wood samples, because the prediction of fiber orientation and MC and density was not stable when we employed only three different direction angles for the fitting like Jorderns et al.”
From Simultaneous detection of density, moisture content and fiber direction of wood by THz time-domain spectroscopy (2020) · cites this paper as [19]
The three parameters, fiber direction, density, and moisture content, can also be simultaneously determined at microwave frequencies.
“The three parameters (i.e., fiber direction, density, and MC) can also be simultaneously determined at microwave frequencies.”
From Simultaneous detection of density, moisture content and fiber direction of wood by THz time-domain spectroscopy (2020) · cites this paper as [19]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Terahertz spectroscopy and imaging - Modern techniques and applications
Jepsen, P. U., Cooke, D. G., & Koch, M. (2011) · Laser & Photonics Reviews · doi:10.1002/lpor.201000011 · Cited by 2,091 · see citing works
Self-citationKashima, M., Tsuchikawa, S., & Inagaki, T. (2020) · Journal of Wood Science · doi:10.1186/s10086-020-01874-3 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
- Authors
- Jördens, C., Scheller, M., Wietzke, S., Romeike, D., Jansen, C., Zentgraf, T., Wiesauer, K., Reisecker, V., & Koch, M.
- Affiliations
- Technische Universität Braunschweig (DE)
- Süddeutsches Kunststoff-Zentrum (Germany) (DE)
- Research Center for Non Destructive Testing (Austria) (AT)
- Corresponding author
- Jördens, C.
- Venue
- Composites Science and Technology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2010-03
- Volume
- 70
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 472-477
- ISSN
- 0266-3538 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2004758598
- Cited by
- 111
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 6.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Composites Science and Technology (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- European Regional Development Fund
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Terahertz technology and applications
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Fiber-reinforced polymer composites
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanics of Materials › Composite Material Mechanics
- Keywords
- terahertz spectroscopy, fiber orientation, glass fiber reinforced composites, short glass fibers, birefringence, dielectric constant, effective medium theory, fiber content, non-destructive testing
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review