Cited by 353Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorMemory and Neural Mechanisms

Functional organization of the medial frontal cortex

Rushworth, Matthew FS, Buckley, Mark J, Behrens, Timothy EJ, Walton, Mark E, Bannerman, David M·2007·Current Opinion in Neurobiology

Abstract

The anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) and adjacent areas of the medial frontal cortex (MFC) have been implicated in monitoring behaviour and in detecting errors. Recent evidence, however, suggests that the ACC not only registers the occurrence of errors but also represents other aspects of the reinforcement history that are crucial for guiding behaviour. Other studies raise the possibility that dorsal MFC areas not only monitor behaviour but also actually control response selection, particularly when the task in hand is changing. Many decisions are made in social contexts and their chances of success depend on what other individuals are doing. Evaluation of other individuals is therefore crucial for effective action selection, and some ACC regions are implicated in this process.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.conb.2007.03.001

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Anterior midcingulate cortex is hypothesized to play a role in executive attention and motor engagement during response selection.

    “The aMCC (Fig. 2, panel B, dusty pink) is hypothesized to play a role in executive attention and motor engagement during response selection (Mansouri et al. 2009; Rushworth et al. 2007).”

    From The brain basis of emotion: a meta-analytic review (2012) · cites this paper as Rushworth et al. 2007

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 54 · Cited by 353

Authors
Rushworth, M. F., Buckley, M. J., Behrens, T. E., Walton, M. E., & Bannerman, D. M.
Affiliations
University of Oxford (GB)
Corresponding author
Rushworth, Matthew FS
Venue
Current Opinion in Neurobiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-04
Volume
17
Issue
2
Pages
220-227
ISSN
0959-4388 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1997957403
Cited by
353
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 30 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 25 · 2012: 16
FWCI
2.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Current Opinion in Neurobiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Wellcome Trust (087736)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
Keywords
anterior cingulate cortex, medial frontal cortex, error detection, error monitoring, reinforcement history, response selection, action selection, social evaluation, decision-making, functional organization
MeSH terms
Animals, Behavior, Brain Mapping, Decision Making, Frontal Lobe, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review